Portrait de Yoshua Bengio

Yoshua Bengio

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur titulaire, Université de Montréal, Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle
Directeur scientifique, Équipe de direction
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage automatique médical
Apprentissage de représentations
Apprentissage par renforcement
Apprentissage profond
Causalité
Modèles génératifs
Modèles probabilistes
Modélisation moléculaire
Neurosciences computationnelles
Raisonnement
Réseaux de neurones en graphes
Réseaux de neurones récurrents
Théorie de l'apprentissage automatique
Traitement du langage naturel

Biographie

*Pour toute demande média, veuillez écrire à medias@mila.quebec.

Pour plus d’information, contactez Marie-Josée Beauchamp, adjointe administrative à marie-josee.beauchamp@mila.quebec.

Reconnu comme une sommité mondiale en intelligence artificielle, Yoshua Bengio s’est surtout distingué par son rôle de pionnier en apprentissage profond, ce qui lui a valu le prix A. M. Turing 2018, le « prix Nobel de l’informatique », avec Geoffrey Hinton et Yann LeCun. Il est professeur titulaire à l’Université de Montréal, fondateur et directeur scientifique de Mila – Institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle, et codirige en tant que senior fellow le programme Apprentissage automatique, apprentissage biologique de l'Institut canadien de recherches avancées (CIFAR). Il occupe également la fonction de directeur scientifique d’IVADO.

En 2018, il a été l’informaticien qui a recueilli le plus grand nombre de nouvelles citations au monde. En 2019, il s’est vu décerner le prestigieux prix Killam. Depuis 2022, il détient le plus grand facteur d’impact (h-index) en informatique à l’échelle mondiale. Il est fellow de la Royal Society de Londres et de la Société royale du Canada, et officier de l’Ordre du Canada.

Soucieux des répercussions sociales de l’IA et de l’objectif que l’IA bénéficie à tous, il a contribué activement à la Déclaration de Montréal pour un développement responsable de l’intelligence artificielle.

Étudiants actuels

Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche - Université du Québec à Rimouski
Visiteur de recherche indépendant
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UQAR
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - N/A
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - KAIST
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Doctorat - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Doctorat - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - Barcelona University
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - Imperial College London
Doctorat - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - Ying Wu Coll of Computing
Doctorat - University of Waterloo
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice alumni - Max-Planck-Institute for Intelligent Systems
Doctorat - UdeM
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - Technical University of Munich
Doctorat - École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Postdoctorat - Polytechnique
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - RWTH Aachen University (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen)
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - KAIST
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Publications

The Effect of diversity in Meta-Learning
Ramnath Kumar
Tristan Deleu
Few-shot learning aims to learn representations that can tackle novel tasks given a small number of examples. Recent studies show that task … (voir plus)distribution plays a vital role in the performance of the model. Conventional wisdom is that task diversity should improve the performance of meta-learning. In this work, we find evidence to the contrary; we study different task distributions on a myriad of models and datasets to evaluate the effect of task diversity on meta-learning algorithms. For this experiment, we train on multiple datasets, and with three broad classes of meta-learning models - Metric-based (i.e., Protonet, Matching Networks), Optimization-based (i.e., MAML, Reptile, and MetaOptNet), and Bayesian meta-learning models (i.e., CNAPs). Our experiments demonstrate that the effect of task diversity on all these algorithms follows a similar trend, and task diversity does not seem to offer any benefits to the learning of the model. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that even a handful of tasks, repeated over multiple batches, would be sufficient to achieve a performance similar to uniform sampling and draws into question the need for additional tasks to create better models.
Constant Memory Attention Block
Leo Feng
Frederick Tung
Hossein Hajimirsadeghi
Mohamed Osama Ahmed
BatchGFN: Generative Flow Networks for Batch Active Learning
Shreshth A Malik
Salem Lahlou
Andrew Jesson
Moksh J. Jain
Nikolay Malkin
Tristan Deleu
Yarin Gal
We introduce BatchGFN—a novel approach for pool-based active learning that uses generative flow networks to sample sets of data points pro… (voir plus)portional to a batch reward. With an appropriate reward function to quantify the utility of acquiring a batch, such as the joint mutual information between the batch and the model parameters, BatchGFN is able to construct highly informative batches for active learning in a principled way. We show our approach enables sampling near-optimal utility batches at inference time with a single forward pass per point in the batch in toy regression problems. This alleviates the computational complexity of batch-aware algorithms and removes the need for greedy approximations to find maximizers for the batch reward. We also present early results for amortizing training across acquisition steps, which will enable scaling to real-world tasks.
Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation
Chris Emezue
Tristan Deleu
Stefan Bauer
GFlowNets for Causal Discovery: an Overview
Dragos Cristian Manta
Edward J Hu
Simulation-Free Schrödinger Bridges via Score and Flow Matching
Alexander Tong
Nikolay Malkin
Kilian FATRAS
Lazar Atanackovic
Yanlei Zhang
Guillaume Huguet
We present simulation-free score and flow matching ([SF]…
Thompson Sampling for Improved Exploration in GFlowNets
Jarrid Rector-Brooks
Kanika Madan
Moksh J. Jain
Maksym Korablyov
Cheng-Hao Liu
Nikolay Malkin
Generative flow networks (GFlowNets) are amortized variational inference algorithms that treat sampling from a distribution over composition… (voir plus)al objects as a sequential decision-making problem with a learnable action policy. Unlike other algorithms for hierarchical sampling that optimize a variational bound, GFlowNet algorithms can stably run off-policy, which can be advantageous for discovering modes of the target distribution. Despite this flexibility in the choice of behaviour policy, the optimal way of efficiently selecting trajectories for training has not yet been systematically explored. In this paper, we view the choice of trajectories for training as an active learning problem and approach it using Bayesian techniques inspired by methods for multi-armed bandits. The proposed algorithm, Thompson sampling GFlowNets (TS-GFN), maintains an approximate posterior distribution over policies and samples trajectories from this posterior for training. We show in two domains that TS-GFN yields improved exploration and thus faster convergence to the target distribution than the off-policy exploration strategies used in past work.
Spotlight Attention: Robust Object-Centric Learning With a Spatial Locality Prior
Ayush K Chakravarthy
Trang M. Nguyen
Anirudh Goyal
Michael Curtis Mozer
Let the Flows Tell: Solving Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems with GFlowNets
Dinghuai Zhang
Hanjun Dai
Nikolay Malkin
Ling Pan
Combinatorial optimization (CO) problems are often NP-hard and thus out of reach for exact algorithms, making them a tempting domain to appl… (voir plus)y machine learning methods. The highly structured constraints in these problems can hinder either optimization or sampling directly in the solution space. On the other hand, GFlowNets have recently emerged as a powerful machinery to efficiently sample from composite unnormalized densities sequentially and have the potential to amortize such solution-searching processes in CO, as well as generate diverse solution candidates. In this paper, we design Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and propose to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space. Efficient training techniques are also developed to benefit long-range credit assignment. Through extensive experiments on a variety of different CO tasks with synthetic and realistic data, we demonstrate that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions. Our implementation is open-sourced at https://github.com/zdhNarsil/GFlowNet-CombOpt.
Model evaluation for extreme risks
Toby Shevlane
Sebastian Farquhar
Ben Garfinkel
Mary Phuong
Jess Whittlestone
Jade Leung
Daniel Kokotajlo
Nahema A. Marchal
Markus Anderljung
Noam Kolt
Lewis Ho
Divya Siddarth
Shahar Avin
W. Hawkins
Been Kim
Iason Gabriel
Vijay Bolina
Jack Clark
Paul F. Christiano … (voir 1 de plus)
Allan Dafoe
Responses of pyramidal cell somata and apical dendrites in mouse visual cortex over multiple days
Colleen J Gillon
Jérôme A. Lecoq
Jason E. Pina
Ruweida Ahmed
Yazan N. Billeh
Shiella Caldejon
Peter Groblewski
Timothy M. Henley
India Kato
Eric Lee
Jennifer Luviano
Kyla Mace
Chelsea Nayan
Thuyanh V. Nguyen
Kat North
Jed Perkins
Sam Seid
Matthew T. Valley
Ali Williford
Timothy P. Lillicrap
Joel Zylberberg
Automated Detection of Anatomical Landmarks During Colonoscopy Using a Deep Learning Model
Mahsa Taghiakbari
Sina Hamidi Ghalehjegh
Emmanuel Jehanno
Tess Berthier
Lisa Di Jorio
Saber Ghadakzadeh
Alan Barkun
Mark Takla
Mickael Bouin
Eric Deslandres
Simon Bouchard
Sacha Sidani
Daniel von Renteln
Abstract Background and aims Identification and photo-documentation of the ileocecal valve (ICV) and appendiceal orifice (AO) confirm comple… (voir plus)teness of colonoscopy examinations. We aimed to develop and test a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model that can automatically identify ICV and AO, and differentiate these landmarks from normal mucosa and colorectal polyps. Methods We prospectively collected annotated full-length colonoscopy videos of 318 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopies. We created three nonoverlapping training, validation, and test data sets with 25,444 unaltered frames extracted from the colonoscopy videos showing four landmarks/image classes (AO, ICV, normal mucosa, and polyps). A DCNN classification model was developed, validated, and tested in separate data sets of images containing the four different landmarks. Results After training and validation, the DCNN model could identify both AO and ICV in 18 out of 21 patients (85.7%). The accuracy of the model for differentiating AO from normal mucosa, and ICV from normal mucosa were 86.4% (95% CI 84.1% to 88.5%), and 86.4% (95% CI 84.1% to 88.6%), respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy of the model for differentiating polyps from normal mucosa was 88.6% (95% CI 86.6% to 90.3%). Conclusion This model offers a novel tool to assist endoscopists with automated identification of AO and ICV during colonoscopy. The model can reliably distinguish these anatomical landmarks from normal mucosa and colorectal polyps. It can be implemented into automated colonoscopy report generation, photo-documentation, and quality auditing solutions to improve colonoscopy reporting quality.