Portrait de Siva Reddy

Siva Reddy

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur adjoint, McGill University, École d'informatique et Département de linguistique
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage de représentations
Apprentissage profond
Raisonnement
Traitement du langage naturel

Biographie

Siva Reddy est professeur adjoint en informatique et linguistique à l’Université McGill. Ses travaux portent sur les algorithmes qui permettent aux ordinateurs de comprendre et de traiter les langues humaines. Il a fait ses études postdoctorales avec le Stanford NLP Group. Son expertise inclut la construction de symboliques linguistiques et induites et de modèles d’apprentissage profond pour le langage.

Étudiants actuels

Postdoctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - University of Edinburgh
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - N/A
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill

Publications

AgentHorizon: Evaluating Agentic Judges for Long-Horizon Computer-Use Tasks
Sina Hajimiri
Fatemeh Pesaran zadeh
Ghazwa Darwiche
Christopher Pal
Computer-use agents are capable of completing complex tasks, increasing the use of automatic judges to determine success, either for trainin… (voir plus)g or for evaluation without human involvement. Despite their flexibility, their reliability on long tasks spanning multiple applications remains unclear. A trajectory, composed of long sequences of screenshots and actions, may appear complete, but in reality violates constraints from the instruction or introduces an unwanted side effect. To identify these errors, a judge needs to examine the trajectory with respect to the user's instruction. To this end, we introduce AgentHorizon, a benchmark of 1,373 computer-use tasks (instruction-trajectory pairs) drawn from 166 hours of human-recorded trajectories spanning three operating systems. By recording trajectories for closely related instructions, we can construct negative tasks by swapping the instructions. This paired design evaluates judges on their ability to distinguish a successful trajectory from one that completed a similar (but incompatible) request. We release the benchmark under three splits: a frontier split, AgentHorizon (AH), a simplified split, AgentHorizon-Simple (AH-S), and a development split, AgentHorizon-Development (AH-D). We further evaluate eleven judges by (1) directly passing the full trajectory (with up to 300 screenshots and actions), and (2) using them as coding agents across five agent harnesses. We find that our best agentic judge, GPT-5.5, achieves 80.9% balanced accuracy on the AH subset. We find that tool-use improves certain models but results in worse performance for open-weight models, and that judges differ drastically in their ability to accept a valid trajectory and reject failed ones. Our findings highlight the need for judges that are capable of locating and verifying often hidden evidence that a task was properly completed inside long interaction histories.
AdaptArena: Evaluating Test-Time Personalization of Web Agents
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong performance on complex web navigation tasks, yet they remain brittle in real-worl… (voir plus)d settings where user intentions are underspecified and preferences are heterogeneous. In practice, users rarely provide explicit profiles, requiring agents to infer latent preferences from implicit signals. Despite its importance for deployment, this problem setting is largely underexplored in existing benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce AdaptArena, a benchmark for evaluating test-time personalization of web agents via implicit preference inference. AdaptArena consists of 480 tasks, featuring both single-preference and double-preference scenarios. Each evaluation task must be solved by retrieving and leveraging the most relevant historical user trajectory that implicitly encodes the target preference. In addition, we introduce AdaptiveAgent, a retrieval-based framework for standardized evaluation of implicit preference inference. Experiments reveal a substantial performance gap: while oracle agents with access to ground-truth preferences achieve an 82.92% success rate, the evaluated LLM agents using our framework reach at most 15.62%. Furthermore, we find that correctly inferring user preferences is necessary but not sufficient for task success, as execution failures in downstream web interactions remain a significant bottleneck even when agents align with the target preference. These findings highlight implicit preference inference and robust action grounding as key challenges for deploying reliable, user-facing web agents. We release our code: https://github.com/McGill-NLP/web-agents-test-time-adaptations
Hierarchical Retrieval at Scale: Bridging Interpretability and Efficiency
Tianyi Chen
Valentina Zantedeschi
Information retrieval is a core component of many intelligent systems as it enables conditioning of outputs on new and large-scale datasets.… (voir plus) While effective, the standard practice of encoding data into high-dimensional representations for similarity search entails large memory and compute footprints, and also makes it hard to inspect the inner workings of the system. Hierarchical retrieval methods offer an interpretable alternative by organizing data at multiple granular levels, yet do not match the efficiency and performance of flat retrieval approaches. In this paper, we propose Retreever, a tree-based method that makes hierarchical retrieval viable at scale by directly optimizing its structure for retrieval performance while naturally providing transparency through meaningful semantic groupings. Our method offers the flexibility to balance cost and utility by indexing data using representations from any tree level. We show that Retreever delivers strong coarse (intermediate levels) and fine representations (terminal level), while achieving the highest retrieval accuracy at the lowest latency among hierarchical methods. These results demonstrate that this family of techniques is viable in practical applications.
CRAG-MM-Diagnostics: Enabling Stage-Wise Analysis of Knowledge-Intensive VQA
Hanseok Oh
Hyunji Lee
Paul Liang
Knowledge-Intensive Visual Question Answering (KI-VQA) benchmarks evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as multimodal knowledge assistants … (voir plus)by requiring external information beyond a provided image to answer questions. KI-VQA involves multiple sub-problems -referring expression understanding, visual grounding, object recognition, knowledge retrieval, and reasoning-yet existing benchmarks typically report only end-task accuracy, obscuring where failures arise. To analyze the full KI-VQA pipeline, we introduce CRAG-MM-Diagnostics, a diagnostic benchmark with stage-wise data annotations that isolate 1) language-based visual grounding, 2) object identification, and 3) knowledge retrieval and reasoning. We evaluate fully parametric and retrieval-augmented VLMs, providing fine-grained analyses using newly collected metadata, such as target ROIs, entity names, and visual complexity scores. Our results point to knowledge retrieval and reasoning as the primary bottleneck, but also highlight issues in the other parts of the KI-VQA pipeline, such as the fact that VLMs struggle with target object identification or that image retrievers struggle to integrate textual cues. These findings expose fundamental limitations in current KI-VQA systems and motivate stage-aware evaluation. We, lastly, leverage these findings to propose a grounded bimodal RAG pipeline that integrates a visual grounding module to crop targets before image retrieval, boosting GPT-5 and Qwen's respective accuracies by 13.3 and 8.5 percentage points.
Humans and LLMs Diverge on Probabilistic Inferences
Sebastian Schuster
Marie-Catherine de Marneffe
Abstract Human reasoning often involves working over limited information to arrive at probabilistic conclusions. In its simplest form, this … (voir plus)involves making an inference that is not strictly entailed by a premise, but rather only likely given the premise. While reasoning LLMs have demonstrated strong performance on logical and mathematical tasks, their behavior on such open-ended, non-deterministic inferences remains largely unexplored. We introduce PROBCOPA, a dataset of 210 handcrafted probabilistic inferences in English, each annotated for inference likelihood by 25–30 human participants. We find that human responses are graded and varied, revealing probabilistic judgments of the inferences in our dataset. Comparing these judgments with responses from eight state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, we show that models consistently fail to produce human-like distributions. Finally, analyzing LLM reasoning chains, we find evidence of a common reasoning pattern used to evaluate such inferences. Our findings reveal persistent differences between humans and LLMs, and underscore the need to evaluate reasoning beyond deterministic settings.1
LACUNA: A Testbed for Evaluating Localization Precision for LLM Unlearning
LLMs memorize sensitive training data, including personally identifiable information (PII), creating a pressing need for reliable post hoc r… (voir plus)emoval methods. Unlearning has emerged as a promising solution, with state-of-the-art(SOTA) methods often following a localize-first, unlearn-second paradigm that targets specific model parameters. However, existing benchmarks evaluate unlearning solely at the output level, leaving open the question of whether unlearning truly erases knowledge from a model's parameters or merely obfuscates it, a concern reinforced by the success of resurfacing attacks. To bridge this gap, we introduce LACUNA: the first unlearning testbed with ground-truth parameter-level localization. LACUNA injects PII of synthetic individuals into predefined parameters of 1B and 7B OLMo-based models via masked continual pretraining, enabling direct evaluation of whether unlearning targets the weights responsible for knowledge storage. We use LACUNA to benchmark current SOTA unlearning methods and find that, despite strong output-level performance, existing methods are highly imprecise and susceptible to resurfacing attacks. We further show that when localization is successful, even a simple gradient-based unlearning method achieves strong erasure and robustness to resurfacing attacks, highlighting the importance of precise unlearning. We release LACUNA to complement behavioral evaluations and drive further advances in robust, localization-based unlearning.
LLM2Vec-Gen: Generative Embeddings from Large Language Models
LLM-based text embedders typically encode the semantic content of their input. However, embedding tasks require mapping diverse inputs to si… (voir plus)milar outputs. Typically, this input-output is addressed by training embedding models with paired data using contrastive learning. In this work, we propose a novel self-supervised approach, LLM2Vec-Gen, which adopts a different paradigm: rather than encoding the input, we learn to represent the model's potential response. Specifically, we add trainable special tokens to the LLM's vocabulary, append them to input, and optimize them to represent the LLM's response in a fixed-length sequence. Training is guided by the LLM's own completion for the query, along with an unsupervised embedding teacher that provides distillation targets. This formulation helps to bridge the input-output gap and transfers LLM capabilities such as safety alignment and reasoning to embedding tasks. Crucially, the LLM backbone remains frozen and training requires only unlabeled queries. LLM2Vec-Gen achieves state-of-the-art self-supervised performance on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB), improving by 9.3% over the best unsupervised embedding teacher. We also observe up to 43.2% reduction in harmful content retrieval and 29.3% improvement in reasoning capabilities for embedding tasks. Finally, the learned embeddings are interpretable and can be decoded into text to reveal their semantic content.
Societal Frameworks Can Improve LLM Alignment
Karolina Stanczak
Konstantin Böttinger
Jeremy Barnes
Jason Stanley
Nicolas Papernot
Timothy Lillicrap
Ana Marasovic
Sylvie Delacroix
Gillian K. Hadfield
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values… (voir plus) — a process coined alignment. However, aligning LLMs remains challenging due to the inherent disconnect between the complexity of human values and the narrow nature of the technological approaches designed to address them. Current alignment methods often lead to misspecified objectives, reflecting the broader issue of incomplete contracts, the impracticality of specifying a contract between a model developer and the model that accounts for every scenario in LLM alignment. In this paper, we argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks, including social, economic, and contractual alignment, and discuss potential solutions drawn from these domains. Given the role of uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks, we then investigate how it manifests in LLM alignment. It is this pervasive uncertainty that necessitates our alternative view on LLM alignment, framing the under-specified nature of its objectives as an opportunity rather than perfect their specification. Beyond technical improvements in LLM alignment, we discuss the need for participatory alignment interface designs.
Would you still call this Dax? Novel Visual References in VLMs and Humans
Vision-language models (VLMs), like human learners, are frequently exposed to new visual concepts, but how they map novel visual references … (voir plus)to language after exposure remains largely underexplored, particularly when those references contradict prior knowledge from pre-training. To study this, we present the Novel Visual References Dataset (NVRD): 19,176 images spanning 90 visual concepts across different levels of visual novelty, each with up to 20 increasingly perturbed versions of the original object to probe generalization. Unlike prior work on visual augmentations of familiar concepts, NVRD comprises entirely novel, open-ended stimuli constructed from scratch, mirroring how humans encounter genuinely new concepts. We evaluate 3 open- and 2 closed-source models alongside 2,400 human judgments for direct human-model comparison, and find that (i) models struggle to acquire novel concepts in-context when they contradict prior knowledge, and (ii) while models and humans show correlated sensitivity to visual perturbations, models significantly overgeneralize, extending learned labels to stimuli that humans reject. We contribute NVRD as a corpus and benchmark for research on visual concept learning in both humans and machines.
Leveraging Routing Dynamics in Mixture-of-Experts Models for Efficient Language Adaptation
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are widely used to scale language models, yet their expert routing behavior and adaptation in a multilingual… (voir plus) setting remain underexplored. In this work, we study multilingual routing dynamics during continual pre-training of an English-centric MoE model on a multilingual corpus, analyzing how expert usage varies across languages. We find that continual multilingual pre-training leads to diffused, language-agnostic routing in early and middle layers, with language specialization primarily emerging in the final layers. We also show that token-level vocabulary overlap between languages plays an important role in how languages are routed. Motivated by these findings, we propose a parameter-efficient adaptation strategy that updates language-specific and shared experts in the final MoE layers. Experiments on MultiBLiMP and Belebele show that our method achieves a strong performance-efficiency trade-off, attaining competitive performance relative to fine-tuning complete final layers, while updating less than 2% of the parameters. Overall, our findings provide insights into where and how language specialization emerges in MoEs during continual pre-training and provide practical insights for low-resource multilingual adaptation. Our code is available at https://github.com/aditi184/moe-routing-adaptation.
WebArena-Pro: A Heterogeneous, Multimodal, Reproducible Benchmark for Web Agents
Fatemeh Pesaran zadeh
Weijian Qi
Alexander Miller
Junyi Song
Yunjia Tian
Dongjin Kang
Seyeon Choi
Ewen Gueguen
Zeyi Liao
Mengqi Yuan
Alexandre Lacoste
Huan Sun … (voir 2 de plus)
Gunhee Kim
Web agents powered by large language and vision-language models are increasingly applied to realistic browser work that spans heterogeneous … (voir plus)applications, multimodal content, and stateful workflows. However, existing reproducible web-agent benchmarks cover only a small number of web applications drawn from a few software categories, and restrict modality to text and vision. Live benchmarks broaden site coverage but sacrifice reproducibility, since pages and data drift between runs. Moreover, existing benchmarks do not meaningfully evaluate whether agents can understand and use audio and video content embedded within web tasks. To address these gaps, we introduce WebArena-Pro, a benchmark comprising 300 tasks across 20 self-hosted web applications in six domain categories, spanning distinct interface conventions, workflows, and data models. Across the evaluated agents, the best performance is achieved by Gemini 3.1 Pro, which attains 37.0 % success under a 50-step budget, while open-source models' performance does not exceed 27.7% success. Among reproducible, human-curated web agent benchmarks, WebArena-Pro provides the broadest application coverage and the most comprehensive multimodal support to date. The benchmark treats audio and video as core observations alongside text and vision, with dedicated actions for extracting information from each. WebArena-Pro runs each task in isolation and supports reproducible, parallel evaluation. Tasks are authored through a dedicated annotator interface, filtered by LLM-assisted triage, and finally validated by humans before release.
Value Drifts: Tracing Value Alignment During LLM Post-Training
As LLMs occupy an increasingly important role in society, they are more and more confronted with questions that require them not only to dra… (voir plus)w on their general knowledge but also to align with certain human value systems. Therefore, studying the alignment of LLMs with human values has become a crucial field of inquiry. Prior work, however, mostly focuses on evaluating the alignment of fully trained models, overlooking the training dynamics by which models learn to express human values. In this work, we investigate how and at which stage value alignment arises during the course of a model's post-training. Our analysis disentangles the effects of post-training algorithms and datasets, measuring both the magnitude and time of value drifts during training. Experimenting with Llama-3 and Qwen-3 models of different sizes and popular supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference optimization datasets and algorithms, we find that the SFT phase generally establishes a model's values, and subsequent preference optimization rarely re-aligns these values. Furthermore, using a synthetic preference dataset that enables controlled manipulation of values, we find that different preference optimization algorithms lead to different value alignment outcomes, even when preference data is held constant. Our findings provide actionable insights into how values are learned during post-training and help to inform data curation, as well as the selection of models and algorithms for preference optimization to improve model alignment to human values.