Dongchan Shin

AdaptArena: Evaluating Test-Time Personalization of Web Agents

Jaewon Moon

Alexandre Lacoste

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong performance on complex web navigation tasks, yet they remain brittle in real-worl… (voir plus)d settings where user intentions are underspecified and preferences are heterogeneous. In practice, users rarely provide explicit profiles, requiring agents to infer latent preferences from implicit signals. Despite its importance for deployment, this problem setting is largely underexplored in existing benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce AdaptArena, a benchmark for evaluating test-time personalization of web agents via implicit preference inference. AdaptArena consists of 480 tasks, featuring both single-preference and double-preference scenarios. Each evaluation task must be solved by retrieving and leveraging the most relevant historical user trajectory that implicitly encodes the target preference. In addition, we introduce AdaptiveAgent, a retrieval-based framework for standardized evaluation of implicit preference inference. Experiments reveal a substantial performance gap: while oracle agents with access to ground-truth preferences achieve an 82.92% success rate, the evaluated LLM agents using our framework reach at most 15.62%. Furthermore, we find that correctly inferring user preferences is necessary but not sufficient for task success, as execution failures in downstream web interactions remain a significant bottleneck even when agents align with the target preference. These findings highlight implicit preference inference and robust action grounding as key challenges for deploying reliable, user-facing web agents. We release our code: https://github.com/McGill-NLP/web-agents-test-time-adaptations

2026-09-28

arXiv (prépublication)

doi.org

arxiv.org

AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectories

Xing Han Lu

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Karolina Stanczak

Peter Shaw

Christopher J. Pal

Siva Reddy

Web agents enable users to perform tasks on web browsers through natural language interaction. Evaluating web agents trajectories is an impo… (voir plus)rtant problem, since it helps us determine whether the agent successfully completed the tasks. Rule-based methods are widely used for this purpose, but they are challenging to extend to new tasks and may not always recognize successful trajectories. We may achieve higher accuracy through human evaluation, but the process would be substantially slower and more expensive. Automatic evaluations with LLMs may avoid the challenges of designing new rules and manually annotating trajectories, enabling faster and cost-effective evaluation. However, it is unclear how effective they are at evaluating web agents. To this end, we propose AgentRewardBench, the first benchmark to assess the effectiveness of LLM judges for evaluating web agents. AgentRewardBench contains 1302 trajectories across 5 benchmarks and 4 LLMs. Each trajectory in AgentRewardBench is reviewed by an expert, who answers questions pertaining to the success, side effects, and repetitiveness of the agent. Using our benchmark, we evaluate 12 LLM judges and find that no single LLM excels across all benchmarks. We also find that the rule-based evaluation used by common benchmarks tends to underreport the success rate of web agents, highlighting a key weakness of rule-based evaluation and the need to develop more flexible automatic evaluations. We release the benchmark at: https://agent-reward-bench.github.io

2025-07-06

Conference on Language Modeling (accepté)

doi.org

openreview.net

DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's think about LLM Reasoning

Sara Vera Marjanovi'c

Arkil Patel

Vaibhav Adlakha

Milad Aghajohari

Parishad BehnamGhader

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Gaurav Kamath

Marius Mosbach

Karolina Stanczak

Siva Reddy

Large Reasoning Models like DeepSeek-R1 mark a fundamental shift in how LLMs approach complex problems. Instead of directly producing an ans… (voir plus)wer for a given input, DeepSeek-R1 creates detailed multi-step reasoning chains, seemingly"thinking"about a problem before providing an answer. This reasoning process is publicly available to the user, creating endless opportunities for studying the reasoning behaviour of the model and opening up the field of Thoughtology. Starting from a taxonomy of DeepSeek-R1's basic building blocks of reasoning, our analyses on DeepSeek-R1 investigate the impact and controllability of thought length, management of long or confusing contexts, cultural and safety concerns, and the status of DeepSeek-R1 vis-\`a-vis cognitive phenomena, such as human-like language processing and world modelling. Our findings paint a nuanced picture. Notably, we show DeepSeek-R1 has a 'sweet spot' of reasoning, where extra inference time can impair model performance. Furthermore, we find a tendency for DeepSeek-R1 to persistently ruminate on previously explored problem formulations, obstructing further exploration. We also note strong safety vulnerabilities of DeepSeek-R1 compared to its non-reasoning counterpart, which can also compromise safety-aligned LLMs.

2025-04-01

ArXiv (prépublication)

arxiv.org

Communauté de pratique de Mila : L'IA agentique

Formation d'entrepreneurs scientifiques

Demandes de supervision

Dongchan Shin

Publications

Communauté de pratique de Mila : L'IA agentique

Formation d'entrepreneurs scientifiques

Demandes de supervision

Mots-clés populaires:

Dongchan Shin

Publications