Portrait de Doina Precup

Doina Precup

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeure agrégée, McGill University, École d'informatique
Chef d'équipe de recherche, Google DeepMind
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage automatique médical
Apprentissage par renforcement
Modèles probabilistes
Modélisation moléculaire
Raisonnement

Biographie

Doina Precup enseigne à l'Université McGill tout en menant des recherches fondamentales sur l'apprentissage par renforcement, notamment les applications de l'IA dans des domaines ayant des répercussions sociales, tels que les soins de santé. Elle s'intéresse à la prise de décision automatique dans des situations d'incertitude élevée.

Elle est membre de l'Institut canadien de recherches avancées (CIFAR) et de l'Association pour l'avancement de l'intelligence artificielle (AAAI), et dirige le bureau montréalais de DeepMind.

Ses spécialités sont les suivantes : intelligence artificielle, apprentissage machine, apprentissage par renforcement, raisonnement et planification sous incertitude, applications.

Étudiants actuels

Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - Birla Institute of Technology
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Doctorat - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Doctorat - Polytechnique
Postdoctorat - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Doctorat - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :

Publications

The Geometry and Topology of Circuits: the Manifolds of Modular Addition
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduced to ar… (voir plus)gue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. In this work, we show that this is not the case, and that both the uniform and trainable attention architectures implement the same algorithm via topologically and geometrically equivalent representations. Our methodology goes beyond the interpretation of individual neurons and weights. Instead, we identify all of the neurons corresponding to each learned representation and then study the collective group of neurons as one entity. This method reveals that each learned representation is a manifold that we can study utilizing tools from topology. Based on this insight, we can statistically analyze the learned representations across hundreds of circuits to demonstrate the similarity between learned modular addition circuits that arise naturally from common deep learning paradigms.
On the geometry and topology of representations: the manifolds of modular addition
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduced to ar… (voir plus)gue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. In this work, we show that this is not the case, and that both uniform attention and trainable attention architectures implement the same algorithm via topologically and geometrically equivalent representations. Our methodology goes beyond the interpretation of individual neurons and weights. Instead, we identify all of the neurons corresponding to each learned representation and then study the collective group of neurons as one entity. This method reveals that each learned representation is a manifold that we can study utilizing tools from topology. Based on this insight, we can statistically analyze the learned representations across hundreds of circuits to demonstrate the similarity between learned modular addition circuits that arise naturally from common deep learning paradigms.
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
Andrew Y. Ng
Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Fernando Pereira
On Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for Coverage of Partially Observable Worlds
Shuo Wen
Louis-Roy Langevin
Antonio Lor'ia
Large Language Model Applications in the Algebra Domain: A Systematic Review
Excitatory-Inhibitory Dynamics in Adaptive Decision-Making
The Geometry and Topology of Modular Addition Representations
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with neural architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduce… (voir plus)d to argue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. Applying geometric and topological analyses to learned representations, we show that this is not the case: Clock and Pizza circuits are topologically and geometrically equivalent and are thus equivalent representations.
Reward the Reward Designer: Making Reinforcement Learning Useful for Clinical Decision Making
Adriana Romero
Unifying Mechanistic Interpretations of Neural Networks Trained on Modular Addition
Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
Andre Barreto
Yiran Mao
Nicolas Perez-Nieves
Mark Rowland
Bobak Shahriari
Reinforcement learning from human feedback usually models preferences using a reward model that does not distinguish between people. We argu… (voir plus)e that this is unlikely to be a good design choice in contexts with high potential for disagreement, like in the training of large language models. We propose a method to specialise a reward model to a person or group of people. Our approach builds on the observation that individual preferences can be captured as a linear combination of a set of general reward features. We show how to learn such features and subsequently use them to quickly adapt the reward model to a specific individual, even if their preferences are not reflected in the training data. We present experiments with large language models comparing the proposed architecture with a non-adaptive reward model and also adaptive counterparts, including models that do in-context personalisation. Depending on how much disagreement there is in the training data, our model either significantly outperforms the baselines or matches their performance with a simpler architecture and more stable training.
Plasticity as the Mirror of Empowerment
David Abel
Michael Bowling
Andre Barreto
Will Dabney
Shi Dong
Steven Hansen
Anna Harutyunyan
Clare Lyle
Georgios Piliouras
Jonathan Richens
Mark Rowland
Tom Schaul
Satinder Singh
Agents are minimally entities that are influenced by their past observations and act to influence future observations. This latter capacity … (voir plus)is captured by empowerment, which has served as a vital framing concept across artificial intelligence and cognitive science. This former capacity, however, is equally foundational: In what ways, and to what extent, can an agent be influenced by what it observes? In this paper, we ground this concept in a universal agent-centric measure that we refer to as plasticity, and reveal a fundamental connection to empowerment. Following a set of desiderata on a suitable definition, we define plasticity using a new information-theoretic quantity we call the generalized directed information. We show that this new quantity strictly generalizes the directed information introduced by Massey (1990) while preserving all of its desirable properties. Under this definition, we find that plasticity is well thought of as the mirror of empowerment: The two concepts are defined using the same measure, with only the direction of influence reversed. Our main result establishes a tension between the plasticity and empowerment of an agent, suggesting that agent design needs to be mindful of both characteristics. We explore the implications of these findings, and suggest that plasticity, empowerment, and their relationship are essential to understanding agency
Uncovering a Universal Abstract Algorithm for Modular Addition in Neural Networks
We propose a testable universality hypothesis, asserting that seemingly disparate neural network solutions observed in the simple task of mo… (voir plus)dular addition are unified under a common abstract algorithm. While prior work interpreted variations in neuron-level representations as evidence for distinct algorithms, we demonstrate - through multi-level analyses spanning neurons, neuron clusters, and entire networks - that multilayer perceptrons and transformers universally implement the abstract algorithm we call the approximate Chinese Remainder Theorem. Crucially, we introduce approximate cosets and show that neurons activate exclusively on them. Furthermore, our theory works for deep neural networks (DNNs). It predicts that universally learned solutions in DNNs with trainable embeddings or more than one hidden layer require only O(log n) features, a result we empirically confirm. This work thus provides the first theory-backed interpretation of multilayer networks solving modular addition. It advances generalizable interpretability and opens a testable universality hypothesis for group multiplication beyond modular addition.