Portrait de Reihaneh Rabbany

Reihaneh Rabbany

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeure adjointe, McGill University, École d'informatique
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage de représentations
Apprentissage sur graphes
Exploration des données
Réseaux de neurones en graphes
Traitement du langage naturel

Biographie

Reihaneh Rabbany est professeure adjointe à l'École d'informatique de l'Université McGill. Elle est membre du corps professoral de Mila – Institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle et titulaire d'une chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR. Elle est également membre du corps enseignant du Centre pour l’étude de la citoyenneté démocratique de McGill. Avant de se joindre à l’Université McGill, elle a été boursière postdoctorale à la School of Computer Science de l'Université Carnegie Mellon. Elle a obtenu un doctorat à l’Université de l’Alberta, au Département d'informatique. Elle dirige le laboratoire de données complexes, dont les recherches se situent à l'intersection de la science des réseaux, de l'exploration des données et de l'apprentissage automatique, et se concentrent sur l'analyse des données interconnectées du monde réel et sur les applications sociales.

Étudiants actuels

Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - University of Sherbrooke
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill University
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill University
Postdoctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - McGill University
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill University
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill University
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - McGill
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Publications

ToxiSight: Leveraging Moderator Expertise Through Behavioral Measurement in Gaming Toxicity Annotation
Vicki Chen
Domenico Tullo
Content moderation systems commonly treat human annotators as interchangeable label sources, resolving disagreements through majority voting… (voir plus) or expert arbitration. We present ToxiSight, an annotation platform that reframes this assumption: rather than extracting consensus, the system supports moderator reasoning by treating hesitation, revision, and disagreement as signals revealing where content is genuinely ambiguous and where taxonomic guidelines fail. ToxiSight integrates gaming-specific contextual widgets with behavioral telemetry, capturing the cognitive processes underlying toxicity validation decisions. Through deployment with 10 professional moderators across 60,000 lines of gaming chat, we demonstrate that behavioral patterns expose systematic category failures invisible to traditional inter-annotator metrics. The Controversial category shows 72% revision rates with fast processing times, indicating immediate recognition of definitional breakdown, while Threats (Life-Threatening) exhibits 75% revisions with slow processing, signaling genuine interpretive complexity. Completion rates improved from 60% to 95%, and moderators reported reduced decision stress when permitted to express uncertainty. This case study demonstrates that trustworthy toxicity detection requires annotation systems designed around the irreducible complexity of human judgment, not against it.
EASE Configuration Facilitates A Reproducible Science of LLM Social Simulations
LLMs are increasingly deployed to simulate social interactions, yet many of the existing simulators remain ad hoc and monolithic. This lack … (voir plus)of architectural standardization prevents reproducible research and complicates downstream evaluation. We advance a rigorous science of LLM-based multi-agent simulation by modularizing core components into Environments, Agents, Simulation engines, and Evaluation metrics (EASE). We demonstrate the utility of EASE configuration by wrapping it in an experimental study schema for orchestrating workflows centered around answering explicit research questions in generated scenarios. We contribute SiliSocS, an open-source, research-ready Silicon Society Sandbox implementing a study-structured EASE configuration to enable highly configurable and reproducible LLM-based social simulations. Using SiliSocS and EASE, we present three case studies, showcasing the system's comprehensive assessment of existing questions, ability to dive deeper into complex questions, and elaboration of existing studies, respectively. Together, these case studies highlight the limitations of current modeling approaches and isolate the impacts of design choices on key results.
Hydra: Towards Transferable Multi-Task Learning on Temporal Graphs
Kiarash Shamsi
Tran Gia Bao Ngo
Baris Coskunuzer
Michael M. Bronstein
Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora
Real-world evolving networks are naturally modeled as temporal graphs (TGs), where capturing temporal dynamics is essential for predicting f… (voir plus)uture graph properties that support downstream decision-making. Existing temporal graph methods have been developed primarily for single-task prediction, and little is known about their generalization across tasks or transfer to unseen networks. This leaves the challenge of multi-task graph property prediction in TGs largely open. We address this challenge by introducing Hydra, a novel architecture that integrates local connectivity features from temporal GNNs with a spectral learning module that captures global connectivity patterns. This design enables joint learning of local and global information under a multi-task objective. In multi-task classification, Hydra achieves an 8.9% relative gain in AUC over the strongest competitor. In multi-task regression, Hydra achieves competitive results in all three tasks, while obtaining the best results in two tasks with a 8.2% relative gain in MAE compared to the strongest baseline. Moreover, Hydra delivers these gains with a 22× reduction in training time compared to temporal transfer models. These results provide the first systematic evidence that multi-task transferable learning on temporal graphs is effective. By delivering consistent top-ranked performance, Hydra highlights multi-task training on temporal graphs as a promising direction toward adaptable foundation models for temporal graphs.
A systematic review of human-LLM interactions in computational thinking empirical studies
Kurtosis-Guided Denoising Score Matching for Tabular Anomaly Detection
Denoising score matching (DSM) provides a way to learn data distributions by training a neural network to recover the score function, define… (voir plus)d as the gradient of the log density, from noise-corrupted samples. Once trained, the score magnitude at a test point reflects how consistent that point is with the learned distribution, making it a natural anomaly signal. The key practical challenge is selecting the perturbation scale: too little noise yields unstable score estimates in sparse regions, while too much erases local structure and weakens anomaly sensitivity. This is compounded by the difficulty of hyperparameter tuning when anomalies are unknown and no validation set is available. We introduce kurtosis-based noise scaling (K-DSM), a per-feature scheme that sets noise levels from the shape of each marginal distribution, improving coverage of low-density regions and precision in high-density regions without extra model complexity. Contrary to prior claims that multi-scale or noise-conditioned training is necessary, we find that a carefully trained single-scale model is already a strong anomaly detector. On standard tabular anomaly detection benchmarks, K-DSM achieves state-of-the-art performance in the semi-supervised setting. When combined with a lightweight EMA-teacher filtering rule that removes low-density training points before each gradient step, it also achieves strong performance in the fully unsupervised (contaminated) setting, suggesting that simple, data-adaptive noise scaling enables robust anomaly detection while reducing reliance on hyperparameter tuning.
ControBench: An Interaction-Aware Benchmark for Controversial Discourse Analysis on Social Networks
Ta Thanh Thuy
Jiaqi Zhu
Xuan Liu
Lin Shang
Lihui Chen
Zheng Yilun
Understanding how people argue across ideological divides online is important for studying political polarization, misinformation, and conte… (voir plus)nt moderation. Existing datasets capture only part of this problem: some preserve text but ignore interaction structure, some model structure without rich semantics, and others represent conversations without stable user-level ideological identity. We introduce ControBench, a benchmark for controversial discourse analysis that combines heterogeneous social interaction graphs with rich textual semantics. Built from Reddit discussions on three topics, Trump, abortion, and religion, ControBench contains 7,370 users, 1,783 posts, and 26,525 interactions. The graph contains user and post nodes connected by semantically enriched edges; in particular, user-comment-user edges encode both a reply and the parent comment that it responds to, preserving local argumentative context. User labels are derived from self-declared Reddit flairs, providing a scalable proxy for ideological identity without manual annotation. The resulting datasets exhibit low or negative adjusted homophily (Trump: -0.77, Abortion: 0.06, Religion: 0.04), reflecting the cross-cutting structure of real-world debate. We evaluate graph neural networks, pretrained language models, and large language models on ControBench and observe distinct performance patterns across topics and model families, especially when ideological boundaries are ambiguous. These results position ControBench as a challenging and realistic benchmark for controversial discourse analysis.
The $\textit{Silicon Society}$ Cookbook: Design Space of LLM-based Social Simulations
Studies attempting to simulate human behavior with …
What do people want to fact-check?
Bijean Ghafouri
Luca Luceri
Emilio Ferrara
AI Epistemic Risks: Emerging Mechanisms & Evidence
Mick Yang
Stephen Casper
Jonathan Stray
Jasmine Li
Cameron Jones
Anna Gausen
Natasha Jacques
Brian Christian
Bálint Gyevnár
Hannah Rose Kirk
Zhonghao He
Dan Zhao (285025)
Siao Si Looi
J. Levy
Kobi Hackenburg
Elizabeth Seger
Matt Kowal
Michelle Malonza
Luke Hewitt
Hause Lin … (voir 10 de plus)
Maarten Sap
Dylan Hadfield-Menell
Thomas Costello
David Rand
Atoosa Kasirzadeh
Gordon Pennycook
Grounding Computer Use Agents on Human Demonstrations
Xiangru Jian
Kevin Qinghong Lin
Kaixin Li
Johan Obando-Ceron
Juan A. Rodriguez
Adriana Romero-Soriano
Christopher Pal
Sai Rajeswar
Building reliable computer-use agents requires grounding: accurately connecting natural language instructions to the correct on-screen eleme… (voir plus)nts. While large datasets exist for web and mobile interactions, high-quality resources for desktop environments are limited. To address this gap, we introduce GroundCUA, a large-scale desktop grounding dataset built from expert human demonstrations. It covers 87 applications across 12 categories and includes 56K screenshots, with every on-screen element carefully annotated for a total of over 3.56M human-verified annotations. From these demonstrations, we generate diverse instructions that capture a wide range of real-world tasks, providing high-quality data for model training. Using GroundCUA, we develop the GroundNext family of models that map instructions to their target UI elements. At both 3B and 7B scales, GroundNext achieves state-of-the-art results across five benchmarks using supervised fine-tuning, while requiring less than one-tenth the training data of prior work. Reinforcement learning post-training further improves performance. These results demonstrate the critical role of high-quality, expert-driven datasets in advancing general-purpose computer-use agents.
Position: Time to Close The Validation Gap in LLM Social Simulations
LLM-based social simulations—in which many language model agents interact over multiple turns—are rapidly proliferating across policy an… (voir plus)alysis, epidemiology, and computational social science. Yet the field lacks consensus on how to validate these simulations, with evaluation methods that are sparse, inconsistent, and rarely shared across disciplinary silos. We argue this creates a serious risk: premature deployment of unvalidated simulators in high-stakes domains. Our position is that the field must pivot from expansion to consolidation, prioritizing methodological standardization—shared benchmarks, open data, and reproducible evaluation protocols grounded in social science and complex systems research. We outline a concrete research program organized around specific learning problems/benchmarks, providing a path toward answering the fundamental question: when are LLM social simulations useful modelling objects?
Deepfakes in the 2025 Canadian Election: Prevalence, Partisanship, and Platform Dynamics
Concerns about AI-generated political content are growing, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how deepfakes actually appear and circ… (voir plus)ulate across social platforms during major events in democratic countries. In this study, we present one of the first in-depth analyses of how these realistic synthetic media shape the political landscape online, focusing specifically on the 2025 Canadian federal election. By analyzing 187,778 posts from X, Bluesky, and Reddit with a high-accuracy detection framework trained on a diverse set of modern generative models, we find that 5.86% of election-related images were deepfakes. Right-leaning accounts shared them more frequently, with 8.66% of their posted images flagged compared to 4.42% for left-leaning users, often with defamatory or conspiratorial intent. Yet, most detected deepfakes were benign or non-political, and harmful ones drew little attention, accounting for only 0.12% of all views on X. Overall, deepfakes were present in the election conversation, but their reach was modest, and realistic fabricated images, although less common, drew higher engagement, highlighting growing concerns about their potential misuse.