Jean-François Godbout

OpenFake: An Open Dataset and Platform Toward Large-Scale Deepfake Detection

Akshatha Arodi

Ga'etan Marceau Caron

Deepfakes, synthetic media created using advanced AI techniques, have intensified the spread of misinformation, particularly in politically … (voir plus)sensitive contexts. Existing deepfake detection datasets are often limited, relying on outdated generation methods, low realism, or single-face imagery, restricting the effectiveness for general synthetic image detection. By analyzing social media posts, we identify multiple modalities through which deepfakes propagate misinformation. Furthermore, our human perception study demonstrates that recently developed proprietary models produce synthetic images increasingly indistinguishable from real ones, complicating accurate identification by the general public. Consequently, we present a comprehensive, politically-focused dataset specifically crafted for benchmarking detection against modern generative models. This dataset contains three million real images paired with descriptive captions, which are used for generating 963k corresponding high-quality synthetic images from a mix of proprietary and open-source models. Recognizing the continual evolution of generative techniques, we introduce an innovative crowdsourced adversarial platform, where participants are incentivized to generate and submit challenging synthetic images. This ongoing community-driven initiative ensures that deepfake detection methods remain robust and adaptive, proactively safeguarding public discourse from sophisticated misinformation threats.

2025-09-11

ArXiv (prépublication)

A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluation

Jacob-Junqi Tian

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Luke Yuxiang Guan

Kellin Pelrine

2025-08-03

Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (publié)

A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluation

Jacob-Junqi Tian

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Yuxiang Guan

Kellin Pelrine

Misinformation is a complex societal issue, and mitigating solutions are difficult to create due to data deficiencies. To address this probl… (voir plus)em, we have curated the largest collection of (mis)information datasets in the literature, totaling 75. From these, we evaluated the quality of all of the 36 datasets that consist of statements or claims, as well as the 9 datasets that consists of data in purely paragraph form. We assess these datasets to identify those with solid foundations for empirical work and those with flaws that could result in misleading and non-generalizable results, such as insufficient label quality, spurious correlations. We further provide state-of-the-art baselines on all these datasets, but show that regardless of label quality, categorical labels may no longer give an accurate evaluation of detection model performance. We discuss alternatives to mitigate this problem. Overall, this guide aims to provide a roadmap for obtaining higher quality data and conducting more effective evaluations, ultimately improving research in misinformation detection. All datasets and other artifacts are available at [anonymized].

2025-08-03

Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (publié)

openreview.net

Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System

Maximilian Puelma Touzel

William Garneau

Manon Gruaz

Mike Pinder

Li Wei Wang

Sukanya Krishna

Luda Cohen

Kellin Pelrine

The proliferation of misinformation poses a significant threat to society, exacerbated by the capabilities of generative AI. This demo paper… (voir plus) introduces Veracity, an open-source AI system designed to empower individuals to combat misinformation through transparent and accessible fact-checking. Veracity leverages the synergy between Large Language Models (LLMs) and web retrieval agents to analyze user-submitted claims and provide grounded veracity assessments with intuitive explanations. Key features include multilingual support, numerical scoring of claim veracity, and an interactive interface inspired by familiar messaging applications. This paper will showcase Veracity's ability to not only detect misinformation but also explain its reasoning, fostering media literacy and promoting a more informed society.

2025-06-19

ArXiv (prépublication)

Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System

Maximilian Puelma Touzel

William Garneau

Manon Gruaz

Mike Pinder

Li Wei Wang

Sukanya Krishna

Luda Cohen

Kellin Pelrine

The proliferation of misinformation poses a significant threat to society, exacerbated by the capabilities of generative AI. This demo paper… (voir plus) introduces Veracity, an open-source AI system designed to empower individuals to combat misinformation through transparent and accessible fact-checking. Veracity leverages the synergy between Large Language Models (LLMs) and web retrieval agents to analyze user-submitted claims and provide grounded veracity assessments with intuitive explanations. Key features include multilingual support, numerical scoring of claim veracity, and an interactive interface inspired by familiar messaging applications. This paper will showcase Veracity's ability to not only detect misinformation but also explain its reasoning, fostering media literacy and promoting a more informed society.

2025-06-18

ArXiv (prépublication)

It's the Thought that Counts: Evaluating the Attempts of Frontier LLMs to Persuade on Harmful Topics

Matthew Kowal

Jasper Timm

Thomas H Costello

Antonio A. Arechar

Gordon Pennycook

David Rand

Adam Gleave

Kellin Pelrine

Persuasion is a powerful capability of large language models (LLMs) that both enables beneficial applications (e.g. helping people quit smok… (voir plus)ing) and raises significant risks (e.g. large-scale, targeted political manipulation). Prior work has found models possess a significant and growing persuasive capability, measured by belief changes in simulated or real users. However, these benchmarks overlook a crucial risk factor: the propensity of a model to attempt to persuade in harmful contexts. Understanding whether a model will blindly ``follow orders'' to persuade on harmful topics (e.g. glorifying joining a terrorist group) is key to understanding the efficacy of safety guardrails. Moreover, understanding if and when a model will engage in persuasive behavior in pursuit of some goal is essential to understanding the risks from agentic AI systems. We propose the Attempt to Persuade Eval (APE) benchmark, that shifts the focus from persuasion success to persuasion attempts, operationalized as a model's willingness to generate content aimed at shaping beliefs or behavior. Our evaluation framework probes frontier LLMs using a multi-turn conversational setup between simulated persuader and persuadee agents. APE explores a diverse spectrum of topics including conspiracies, controversial issues, and non-controversially harmful content. We introduce an automated evaluator model to identify willingness to persuade and measure the frequency and context of persuasive attempts. We find that many open and closed-weight models are frequently willing to attempt persuasion on harmful topics and that jailbreaking can increase willingness to engage in such behavior. Our results highlight gaps in current safety guardrails and underscore the importance of evaluating willingness to persuade as a key dimension of LLM risk. APE is available at github.com/AlignmentResearch/AttemptPersuadeEval

2025-06-03

ArXiv (prépublication)

It's the Thought that Counts: Evaluating the Attempts of Frontier LLMs to Persuade on Harmful Topics

Matthew Kowal

Jasper Timm

Thomas H Costello

Antonio A. Arechar

Gordon Pennycook

David Rand

Adam Gleave

Kellin Pelrine

Persuasion is a powerful capability of large language models (LLMs) that both enables beneficial applications (e.g. helping people quit smok… (voir plus)ing) and raises significant risks (e.g. large-scale, targeted political manipulation). Prior work has found models possess a significant and growing persuasive capability, measured by belief changes in simulated or real users. However, these benchmarks overlook a crucial risk factor: the propensity of a model to attempt to persuade in harmful contexts. Understanding whether a model will blindly ``follow orders'' to persuade on harmful topics (e.g. glorifying joining a terrorist group) is key to understanding the efficacy of safety guardrails. Moreover, understanding if and when a model will engage in persuasive behavior in pursuit of some goal is essential to understanding the risks from agentic AI systems. We propose the Attempt to Persuade Eval (APE) benchmark, that shifts the focus from persuasion success to persuasion attempts, operationalized as a model's willingness to generate content aimed at shaping beliefs or behavior. Our evaluation framework probes frontier LLMs using a multi-turn conversational setup between simulated persuader and persuadee agents. APE explores a diverse spectrum of topics including conspiracies, controversial issues, and non-controversially harmful content. We introduce an automated evaluator model to identify willingness to persuade and measure the frequency and context of persuasive attempts. We find that many open and closed-weight models are frequently willing to attempt persuasion on harmful topics and that jailbreaking can increase willingness to engage in such behavior. Our results highlight gaps in current safety guardrails and underscore the importance of evaluating willingness to persuade as a key dimension of LLM risk. APE is available at github.com/AlignmentResearch/AttemptPersuadeEval

2025-06-01

arXiv (publié)

From Intuition to Understanding: Using AI Peers to Overcome Physics Misconceptions

Ruben Weijers

Denton Wu

Hannah Betts

Tamara Jacod

Yuxiang Guan

Vidya Sujaya

Kushal Dev

Toshali Goel

William Delooze

Ying Wu

Kellin Pelrine

Generative AI has the potential to transform personalization and accessibility of education. However, it raises serious concerns about accur… (voir plus)acy and helping students become independent critical thinkers. In this study, we designed a helpful yet fallible AI "Peer" to help students correct fundamental physics misconceptions related to Newtonian mechanic concepts. In contrast to approaches that seek near-perfect accuracy to create an authoritative AI tutor or teacher, we directly inform students that this AI can answer up to 40\% of questions incorrectly. In a randomized controlled trial with 165 students, those who engaged in targeted dialogue with the AI Peer achieved post-test scores that were, on average, 10.5 percentage points higher—with over 20 percentage points higher normalized gain—than a control group that discussed physics history. Qualitative feedback indicated that 91% of the treatment group's AI interactions were rated as helpful. Furthermore, by comparing student performance on pre- and post-test questions about the same concept, along with experts' annotations of the AI interactions, we find initial evidence suggesting the improvement in performance does not depend on the correctness of the AI. With further research, the AI Peer paradigm described here could open new possibilities for how we learn, adapt to, and grow with AI.

2025-03-05

ICLR.cc/2025/Workshop/Bi-Align (poster)

openreview.net

Online Influence Campaigns: Strategies and Vulnerabilities

Andreea Musulan

Veronica Xia

Ethan Kosak-Hine

Tom Gibbs

Vidya Sujaya

Kellin Pelrine

U. Montr'eal

Ivado

M. University

In order to combat the creation and spread of harmful content online, this paper defines and contextualizes the concept of inauthentic, soci… (voir plus)etal-scale manipulation by malicious actors. We review the literature on societally harmful content and how it proliferates to analyze the manipulation strategies used by such actors and the vulnerabilities they target. We also provide an overview of three case studies of extensive manipulation campaigns to emphasize the severity of the problem. We then address the role that Artificial Intelligence plays in the development and dissemination of harmful content, and how its evolution presents new threats to societal cohesion for countries across the globe. Our survey aims to increase our understanding of not just particular aspects of these threats, but also the strategies underlying their deployment, so we can effectively prepare for the evolving cybersecurity landscape.

2024-12-18

ArXiv (prépublication)

A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluation

Jacob-Junqi Tian

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Yuxiang Guan

Kellin Pelrine

2024-11-07

ArXiv (prépublication)

A Simulation System Towards Solving Societal-Scale Manipulation

Maximilian Puelma Touzel

Sneheel Sarangi

Austin Welch

Gayatri Krishnakumar

Dan Zhao

Zachary Yang

Hao Yu

Ethan Kosak-Hine

Tom Gibbs

Andreea Musulan

Busra Tugce Gurbuz

Kellin Pelrine

The rise of AI-driven manipulation poses significant risks to societal trust and democratic processes. Yet, studying these effects in real-w… (voir plus)orld settings at scale is ethically and logistically impractical, highlighting a need for simulation tools that can model these dynamics in controlled settings to enable experimentation with possible defenses. We present a simulation environment designed to address this. We elaborate upon the Concordia framework that simulates offline, `real life' activity by adding online interactions to the simulation through social media with the integration of a Mastodon server. We improve simulation efficiency and information flow, and add a set of measurement tools, particularly longitudinal surveys. We demonstrate the simulator with a tailored example in which we track agents' political positions and show how partisan manipulation of agents can affect election results.

2024-10-17

ArXiv (prépublication)