Le Studio d'IA pour le climat de Mila vise à combler l’écart entre la technologie et l'impact afin de libérer le potentiel de l'IA pour lutter contre la crise climatique rapidement et à grande échelle.
Hugo Larochelle nommé directeur scientifique de Mila
Professeur associé à l’Université de Montréal et ancien responsable du laboratoire de recherche en IA de Google à Montréal, Hugo Larochelle est un pionnier de l’apprentissage profond et fait partie des chercheur·euses les plus respecté·es au Canada.
Perspectives sur l’IA pour les responsables des politiques
Co-dirigé par Mila et le CIFAR, ce programme met en relation les décideur·euse·s avec des chercheur·euse·s de pointe en IA grâce à une combinaison de consultations ouvertes et d'exercices de test de faisabilité des politiques. La prochaine session aura lieu les 9 et 10 octobre.
Nous utilisons des témoins pour analyser le trafic et l’utilisation de notre site web, afin de personnaliser votre expérience. Vous pouvez désactiver ces technologies à tout moment, mais cela peut restreindre certaines fonctionnalités du site. Consultez notre Politique de protection de la vie privée pour en savoir plus.
Paramètre des cookies
Vous pouvez activer et désactiver les types de cookies que vous souhaitez accepter. Cependant certains choix que vous ferez pourraient affecter les services proposés sur nos sites (ex : suggestions, annonces personnalisées, etc.).
Cookies essentiels
Ces cookies sont nécessaires au fonctionnement du site et ne peuvent être désactivés. (Toujours actif)
Cookies analyse
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour mesurer l'audience de nos sites ?
Multimedia Player
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour afficher et vous permettre de regarder les contenus vidéo hébergés par nos partenaires (YouTube, etc.) ?
Reward models (RMs) are fundamental to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) via human feedback, yet they often suffer from reward hacking. … (voir plus)They tend to latch on to superficial or spurious attributes, such as response length or formatting, mistaking these cues learned from correlations in training data for the true causal drivers of quality (e.g., factuality, relevance). This occurs because standard training objectives struggle to disentangle these factors, leading to brittle RMs and misaligned policies. We introduce Crome (Causally Robust Reward Modeling), a novel framework grounded in an explicit causal model designed to mitigate reward hacking. Crome employs the following synthetic targeted augmentations during training: (1) Causal Augmentations, which are pairs that differ along specific causal attributes, to enforce sensitivity along each causal attribute individually, and (2) Neutral Augmentations, which are tie-label pairs varying primarily in spurious attributes, to enforce invariance along spurious attributes. Notably, our augmentations are produced without any knowledge of spurious factors, via answer interventions only along causal rubrics, that are identified by querying an oracle LLM. Empirically, Crome significantly outperforms standard baselines on RewardBench, improving average accuracy by up to 5.4% and achieving gains of up to 13.2% and 7.2% in specific categories. The robustness of Crome is further testified by the consistent gains obtained in a Best-of-N inference setting across increasing N, across various benchmarks, including the popular RewardBench (covering chat, chat-hard, safety, and reasoning tasks), the safety-focused WildGuardTest, and the reasoning-specific GSM8k.
We study the finite-time behaviour of the popular temporal difference (TD) learning algorithm, when combined with tail-averaging. We derive … (voir plus)finite time bounds on the parameter error of the tail-averaged TD iterate under a step-size choice that does not require information about the eigenvalues of the matrix underlying the projected TD fixed point. Our analysis shows that tail-averaged TD converges at the optimal O (1/t) rate, both in expectation and with high probability. In addition, our bounds exhibit a sharper rate of decay for the initial error (bias), which is an improvement over averaging all iterates. We also propose and analyse a variant of TD that incorporates regularisation, and show that this variant fares favourably in problems with ill-conditioned features.
2023-04-11
Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (publié)
In this paper, we study the finite-time behaviour of temporal difference (TD) learning algorithms when combined with tail-averaging, and pr… (voir plus)esent instance dependent bounds on the parameter error of the tail-averaged TD iterate. Our error bounds hold in expectation as well as with high probability, exhibit a sharper rate of decay for the initial error (bias), and are comparable with existing bounds in the literature.