Portrait of Rishabh Agarwal

Rishabh Agarwal

Associate Industry Member
Adjunct Professor, McGill University, School of Computer Science
Google DeepMind
Research Topics
Deep Learning
Large Language Models (LLM)
Reinforcement Learning
Website
Google Scholar
X

Biography

I am a research scientist in the Google DeepMind Team in Montréal. I am also an Adjunct Professor at McGill University and an Associate Industry Member at Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute. I finished my PhD at Mila under the guidance of Aaron Courville and Marc Bellemare. Previously, I spent a year at Geoffrey Hinton's amazing team in Google Brain, Toronto. Earlier, I graduated in Computer Science and Engineering from IIT Bombay.

My research work mainly revolves around language models and deep reinforcement learning (RL), and includes an outstanding paper award at NeurIPS.

Current Students

Morgane Moss
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Aaron Courville

Publications

Faster, More Efficient RLHF through Off-Policy Asynchronous Learning
Michael Noukhovitch
Shengyi Huang
Sophie Xhonneux
Arian Hosseini
Rishabh Agarwal
Aaron Courville
To achieve state-of-the-art chatbots, large language models are finetuned with reinforcement learning (RL), frequently to optimize human fee… (see more)dback (RLHF). This process is computationally expensive and can take weeks. Offline approaches, like DPO, learn on a static dataset and are efficient but not performant. The dominant paradigm, online and on-policy---synchronously generating from the model, labelling with a reward model, and learning on feedback from the model's own outputs---is performant but not efficient. Following prior work in the generall deep RL setting, we propose separating the actor and learner in RLHF. This enables the asynchronously generation of new samples while learning on prior samples, thus leading to overall faster training and better scaling. But this requires a novel regime for RLHF, online but off-policy: learning on samples from a previous version of our model. We ask a fundamental question: how much off-policyness can we tolerate for asynchronous training to speed up learning but maintain performance? We find that a contrastive loss, Online DPO, is most robust to off-policy data and that robustness increases with the scale of the policy model. We show even further compute optimizations but demonstrate that they come at a performance cost, giving rise to a trade-off. Finally, we verify our design choices by training LLaMA 3.1 8B with RLHF as a helpful chatbot in half the time of a synchronous run while matching final performance.
2025-01-22
ICLR.cc/2025/Conference (poster)
openreview.net
openreview.net
Asynchronous RLHF: Faster and More Efficient Off-Policy RL for Language Models
Michael Noukhovitch
Shengyi Huang
Sophie Xhonneux
Arian Hosseini
Rishabh Agarwal
Aaron Courville
The dominant paradigm for RLHF is online and on-policy RL: synchronously generating from the large language model (LLM) policy, labelling wi… (see more)th a reward model, and learning using feedback on the LLM's own outputs. While performant, this paradigm is computationally inefficient. Inspired by classical deep RL literature, we propose separating generation and learning in RLHF. This enables asynchronous generation of new samples while simultaneously training on old samples, leading to faster training and more compute-optimal scaling. However, asynchronous training relies on an underexplored regime, online but off-policy RLHF: learning on samples from previous iterations of our model. To understand the challenges in this regime, we investigate a fundamental question: how much off-policyness can we tolerate for asynchronous training to speed up learning but maintain performance? Among several RLHF algorithms we tested, we find that online DPO is most robust to off-policy data, and robustness increases with the scale of the policy model. We study further compute optimizations for asynchronous RLHF but find that they come at a performance cost, giving rise to a trade-off. Finally, we verify the scalability of asynchronous RLHF by training LLaMA 3.1 8B on an instruction-following task 40% faster than a synchronous run while matching final performance.
2024-10-23
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning
Aviral Kumar
Vincent Zhuang
Rishabh Agarwal
Yi Su
John D Co-Reyes
Avi Singh
Kate Baumli
Shariq N Iqbal
Colton Bishop
Rebecca Roelofs
Lei M Zhang
Kay McKinney
Disha Shrivastava
Cosmin Paduraru
George Tucker
Doina Precup
Feryal Behbahani
Aleksandra Faust
Self-correction is a highly desirable capability of large language models (LLMs), yet it has consistently been found to be largely ineffecti… (see more)ve in modern LLMs. Current methods for training self-correction typically depend on either multiple models, a more advanced model, or additional forms of supervision. To address these shortcomings, we develop a multi-turn online reinforcement learning (RL) approach, SCoRe, that significantly improves an LLM's self-correction ability using entirely self-generated data. To build SCoRe, we first show that variants of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline model-generated correction traces are often insufficient for instilling self-correction behavior. In particular, we observe that training via SFT falls prey to either a distribution mismatch between mistakes made by the data-collection policy and the model's own responses, or to behavior collapse, where learning implicitly prefers only a certain mode of correction behavior that is often not effective at self-correction on test problems. SCoRe addresses these challenges by training under the model's own distribution of self-generated correction traces and using appropriate regularization to steer the learning process into learning a self-correction behavior that is effective at test time as opposed to fitting high-reward responses for a given prompt. This regularization process includes an initial phase of multi-turn RL on a base model to generate a policy initialization that is less susceptible to collapse, followed by using a reward bonus to amplify self-correction. With Gemini 1.0 Pro and 1.5 Flash models, we find that SCoRe achieves state-of-the-art self-correction performance, improving the base models' self-correction by 15.6% and 9.1% respectively on MATH and HumanEval.
2024-09-19
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning
Aviral Kumar
Vincent Zhuang
Rishabh Agarwal
Yi Su
John D Co-Reyes
Avi Singh
Kate Baumli
Shariq N Iqbal
Colton Bishop
Rebecca Roelofs
Lei M Zhang
Kay McKinney
Disha Shrivastava
Cosmin Paduraru
George Tucker
Doina Precup
Feryal Behbahani
Aleksandra Faust
Self-correction is a highly desirable capability of large language models (LLMs), yet it has consistently been found to be largely ineffecti… (see more)ve in modern LLMs. Current methods for training self-correction typically depend on either multiple models, a more advanced model, or additional forms of supervision. To address these shortcomings, we develop a multi-turn online reinforcement learning (RL) approach, SCoRe, that significantly improves an LLM's self-correction ability using entirely self-generated data. To build SCoRe, we first show that variants of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on offline model-generated correction traces are often insufficient for instilling self-correction behavior. In particular, we observe that training via SFT falls prey to either a distribution mismatch between mistakes made by the data-collection policy and the model's own responses, or to behavior collapse, where learning implicitly prefers only a certain mode of correction behavior that is often not effective at self-correction on test problems. SCoRe addresses these challenges by training under the model's own distribution of self-generated correction traces and using appropriate regularization to steer the learning process into learning a self-correction behavior that is effective at test time as opposed to fitting high-reward responses for a given prompt. This regularization process includes an initial phase of multi-turn RL on a base model to generate a policy initialization that is less susceptible to collapse, followed by using a reward bonus to amplify self-correction. With Gemini 1.0 Pro and 1.5 Flash models, we find that SCoRe achieves state-of-the-art self-correction performance, improving the base models' self-correction by 15.6% and 9.1% respectively on MATH and HumanEval.
2024-09-19
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Many-Shot In-Context Learning
Rishabh Agarwal
Avi Singh
Lei M Zhang
Bernd Bohnet
Stephanie C.Y. Chan
Ankesh Anand
Zaheer Abbas
Azade Nova
John D Co-Reyes
Eric Chu
Feryal Behbahani
Aleksandra Faust
Hugo Larochelle
Large language models (LLMs) excel at few-shot in-context learning (ICL) -- learning from a few examples provided in context at inference, w… (see more)ithout any weight updates. Newly expanded context windows allow us to investigate ICL with hundreds or thousands of examples -- the many-shot regime. Going from few-shot to many-shot, we observe significant performance gains across a wide variety of generative and discriminative tasks. While promising, many-shot ICL can be bottlenecked by the available amount of human-generated examples. To mitigate this limitation, we explore two new settings: Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL. Reinforced ICL uses model-generated chain-of-thought rationales in place of human examples. Unsupervised ICL removes rationales from the prompt altogether, and prompts the model only with domain-specific questions. We find that both Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL can be quite effective in the many-shot regime, particularly on complex reasoning tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that, unlike few-shot learning, many-shot learning is effective at overriding pretraining biases, can learn high-dimensional functions with numerical inputs, and performs comparably to fine-tuning. We also find that inference cost increases linearly in the many-shot regime, and frontier LLMs benefit from many-shot ICL to varying degrees. Our analysis also reveals the limitations of next-token prediction loss as an indicator of downstream ICL performance.
2024-04-17
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Many-Shot In-Context Learning
Rishabh Agarwal
Avi Singh
Lei M Zhang
Bernd Bohnet
Stephanie C.Y. Chan
Ankesh Anand
Zaheer Abbas
Azade Nova
John D Co-Reyes
Eric Chu
Feryal Behbahani
Aleksandra Faust
Hugo Larochelle
Large language models (LLMs) excel at few-shot in-context learning (ICL) -- learning from a few examples provided in context at inference, w… (see more)ithout any weight updates. Newly expanded context windows allow us to investigate ICL with hundreds or thousands of examples -- the many-shot regime. Going from few-shot to many-shot, we observe significant performance gains across a wide variety of generative and discriminative tasks. While promising, many-shot ICL can be bottlenecked by the available amount of human-generated examples. To mitigate this limitation, we explore two new settings: Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL. Reinforced ICL uses model-generated chain-of-thought rationales in place of human examples. Unsupervised ICL removes rationales from the prompt altogether, and prompts the model only with domain-specific questions. We find that both Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL can be quite effective in the many-shot regime, particularly on complex reasoning tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that, unlike few-shot learning, many-shot learning is effective at overriding pretraining biases, can learn high-dimensional functions with numerical inputs, and performs comparably to fine-tuning. We also find that inference cost increases linearly in the many-shot regime, and frontier LLMs benefit from many-shot ICL to varying degrees. Our analysis also reveals the limitations of next-token prediction loss as an indicator of downstream ICL performance.
2024-04-17
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Many-Shot In-Context Learning
Rishabh Agarwal
Avi Singh
Lei M Zhang
Bernd Bohnet
Stephanie C.Y. Chan
Ankesh Anand
Zaheer Abbas
Azade Nova
John D Co-Reyes
Eric Chu
Feryal Behbahani
Aleksandra Faust
Hugo Larochelle
Large language models (LLMs) excel at few-shot in-context learning (ICL) -- learning from a few examples provided in context at inference, w… (see more)ithout any weight updates. Newly expanded context windows allow us to investigate ICL with hundreds or thousands of examples -- the many-shot regime. Going from few-shot to many-shot, we observe significant performance gains across a wide variety of generative and discriminative tasks. While promising, many-shot ICL can be bottlenecked by the available amount of human-generated examples. To mitigate this limitation, we explore two new settings: Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL. Reinforced ICL uses model-generated chain-of-thought rationales in place of human examples. Unsupervised ICL removes rationales from the prompt altogether, and prompts the model only with domain-specific questions. We find that both Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL can be quite effective in the many-shot regime, particularly on complex reasoning tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that, unlike few-shot learning, many-shot learning is effective at overriding pretraining biases, can learn high-dimensional functions with numerical inputs, and performs comparably to fine-tuning. We also find that inference cost increases linearly in the many-shot regime, and frontier LLMs benefit from many-shot ICL to varying degrees. Our analysis also reveals the limitations of next-token prediction loss as an indicator of downstream ICL performance.
2024-04-17
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RL
Jesse Farebrother
Jordi Orbay
Quan Vuong
Adrien Ali Taiga
Yevgen Chebotar
Ted Xiao
Alex Irpan
Sergey Levine
Pablo Samuel Castro
Aleksandra Faust
Aviral Kumar
Rishabh Agarwal
Value functions are a central component of deep reinforcement learning (RL). These functions, parameterized by neural networks, are trained … (see more)using a mean squared error regression objective to match bootstrapped target values. However, scaling value-based RL methods that use regression to large networks, such as high-capacity Transformers, has proven challenging. This difficulty is in stark contrast to supervised learning: by leveraging a cross-entropy classification loss, supervised methods have scaled reliably to massive networks. Observing this discrepancy, in this paper, we investigate whether the scalability of deep RL can also be improved simply by using classification in place of regression for training value functions. We demonstrate that value functions trained with categorical cross-entropy significantly improves performance and scalability in a variety of domains. These include: single-task RL on Atari 2600 games with SoftMoEs, multi-task RL on Atari with large-scale ResNets, robotic manipulation with Q-transformers, playing Chess without search, and a language-agent Wordle task with high-capacity Transformers, achieving state-of-the-art results on these domains. Through careful analysis, we show that the benefits of categorical cross-entropy primarily stem from its ability to mitigate issues inherent to value-based RL, such as noisy targets and non-stationarity. Overall, we argue that a simple shift to training value functions with categorical cross-entropy can yield substantial improvements in the scalability of deep RL at little-to-no cost.
2024-03-06
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners
Arian Hosseini
Xingdi Yuan
Nikolay Malkin
Aaron Courville
Alessandro Sordoni
Rishabh Agarwal
Common self-improvement approaches for large language models (LLMs), such as STaR, iteratively fine-tune LLMs on self-generated solutions to… (see more) improve their problem-solving ability. However, these approaches discard the large amounts of incorrect solutions generated during this process, potentially neglecting valuable information in such solutions. To address this shortcoming, we propose V-STaR that utilizes both the correct and incorrect solutions generated during the self-improvement process to train a verifier using DPO that judges correctness of model-generated solutions. This verifier is used at inference time to select one solution among many candidate solutions. Running V-STaR for multiple iterations results in progressively better reasoners and verifiers, delivering a 4% to 17% test accuracy improvement over existing self-improvement and verification approaches on common code generation and math reasoning benchmarks with LLaMA2 models.
2024-02-09
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners
Arian Hosseini
Xingdi Yuan
Nikolay Malkin
Aaron Courville
Alessandro Sordoni
Rishabh Agarwal
Common self-improvement approaches for large language models (LLMs), such as STaR, iteratively fine-tune LLMs on self-generated solutions to… (see more) improve their problem-solving ability. However, these approaches discard the large amounts of incorrect solutions generated during this process, potentially neglecting valuable information in such solutions. To address this shortcoming, we propose V-STaR that utilizes both the correct and incorrect solutions generated during the self-improvement process to train a verifier using DPO that judges correctness of model-generated solutions. This verifier is used at inference time to select one solution among many candidate solutions. Running V-STaR for multiple iterations results in progressively better reasoners and verifiers, delivering a 4% to 17% test accuracy improvement over existing self-improvement and verification approaches on common code generation and math reasoning benchmarks with LLaMA2 models.
2024-02-09
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners
Arian Hosseini
Xingdi Yuan
Nikolay Malkin
Aaron Courville
Alessandro Sordoni
Rishabh Agarwal
Common self-improvement approaches for large language models (LLMs), such as STaR, iteratively fine-tune LLMs on self-generated solutions to… (see more) improve their problem-solving ability. However, these approaches discard the large amounts of incorrect solutions generated during this process, potentially neglecting valuable information in such solutions. To address this shortcoming, we propose V-STaR that utilizes both the correct and incorrect solutions generated during the self-improvement process to train a verifier using DPO that judges correctness of model-generated solutions. This verifier is used at inference time to select one solution among many candidate solutions. Running V-STaR for multiple iterations results in progressively better reasoners and verifiers, delivering a 4% to 17% test accuracy improvement over existing self-improvement and verification approaches on common code generation and math reasoning benchmarks with LLaMA2 models.
2024-02-09
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org
V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners
Arian Hosseini
Xingdi Yuan
Nikolay Malkin
Aaron Courville
Alessandro Sordoni
Rishabh Agarwal
Common self-improvement approaches for large language models (LLMs), such as STaR, iteratively fine-tune LLMs on self-generated solutions to… (see more) improve their problem-solving ability. However, these approaches discard the large amounts of incorrect solutions generated during this process, potentially neglecting valuable information in such solutions. To address this shortcoming, we propose V-STaR that utilizes both the correct and incorrect solutions generated during the self-improvement process to train a verifier using DPO that judges correctness of model-generated solutions. This verifier is used at inference time to select one solution among many candidate solutions. Running V-STaR for multiple iterations results in progressively better reasoners and verifiers, delivering a 4% to 17% test accuracy improvement over existing self-improvement and verification approaches on common code generation and math reasoning benchmarks with LLaMA2 models.
2024-02-09
ArXiv (preprint)
doi.org
arxiv.org