La prochaine rencontre, qui aura lieu le 10 novembre à Mila, permettra d'explorer comment pouvons-nous collectivement développer, encadrer et déployer des systèmes agentiques performants, fiables et sécuritaires en connectant chercheur·euse·s académiques, expert·e·s industriel·le·s et praticien·ne·s.
Ce programme à temps partiel offre aux scientifiques l'opportunité de tester leur intérêt pour l'entrepreneuriat. Vous avez jusqu'au 5 octobre pour postuler.
Avantage IA : productivité dans la fonction publique
Apprenez à tirer parti de l’IA générative pour soutenir et améliorer votre productivité au travail. La prochaine cohorte se déroulera en ligne les 6 et 8 octobre 2026, en anglais.
Nous utilisons des témoins pour analyser le trafic et l’utilisation de notre site web, afin de personnaliser votre expérience. Vous pouvez désactiver ces technologies à tout moment, mais cela peut restreindre certaines fonctionnalités du site. Consultez notre Politique de protection de la vie privée pour en savoir plus.
Paramètre des cookies
Vous pouvez activer et désactiver les types de cookies que vous souhaitez accepter. Cependant certains choix que vous ferez pourraient affecter les services proposés sur nos sites (ex : suggestions, annonces personnalisées, etc.).
Cookies essentiels
Ces cookies sont nécessaires au fonctionnement du site et ne peuvent être désactivés. (Toujours actif)
Cookies analyse
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour mesurer l'audience de nos sites ?
Lecteur Multimédia
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour afficher et vous permettre de regarder les contenus vidéo hébergés par nos partenaires (YouTube, etc.) ?
Continual reinforcement learning considers an agent receiving and learning from a stream of experience. The agent only learns about its worl… (voir plus)d through these experiences and aims to maximize its accumulated reward. A fundamental problem is to evaluate this agent using only its stream of experience, without assuming a particular structure of the world.
We outline a novel approach to this problem: Define an \textit{examiner} that observes the same stream of experience and, at every timestep, computes a \textit{perceived regret}, representing the agent's suboptimality gap in value from the examiner's perspective.
We empirically demonstrate how perceived regret can be a useful performance measure, applicable to arbitrary streams of experience.
Theoretically, we prove that there is no universal examiner, capable of accurately assessing all agents in any world but specific modeling biases can enable success in associated environments.
Further experiments show the flexibility of this approach and explore its nuances.
Loss of plasticity, trainability loss, and primacy bias have been identified as issues arising when training deep neural networks on sequenc… (voir plus)es of tasks -- all referring to the increased difficulty in training on new tasks. We propose to use Parseval regularization, which maintains orthogonality of weight matrices, to preserve useful optimization properties and improve training in a continual reinforcement learning setting. We show that it provides significant benefits to RL agents on a suite of gridworld, CARL and MetaWorld tasks. We conduct comprehensive ablations to identify the source of its benefits and investigate the effect of certain metrics associated to network trainability including weight matrix rank, weight norms and policy entropy.
2024-12-10
Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Accept (poster))
Bandit and reinforcement learning (RL) problems can often be framed as optimization problems where the goal is to maximize average performan… (voir plus)ce while having access only to stochastic estimates of the true gradient. Traditionally, stochastic optimization theory predicts that learning dynamics are governed by the curvature of the loss function and the noise of the gradient estimates. In this paper we demonstrate that this is not the case for bandit and RL problems. To allow our analysis to be interpreted in light of multi-step MDPs, we focus on techniques derived from stochastic optimization principles (e.g., natural policy gradient and EXP3) and we show that some standard assumptions from optimization theory are violated in these problems. We present theoretical results showing that, at least for bandit problems, curvature and noise are not sufficient to explain the learning dynamics and that seemingly innocuous choices like the baseline can determine whether an algorithm converges. These theoretical findings match our empirical evaluation, which we extend to multi-state MDPs.
2021-07-17
International Conference on Machine Learning (inconnu)