This program supports AI startups at any time of the year. Benefit from cutting-edge resources and tailored support to accelerate your technology's development.
Offered by Mila and the Public Policy Forum, this program is designed to equip policy and decision makers with the tools to navigate the opportunities and risks of AI. The next cohort will be held in French on September 1-2, 2026, at Mila.
Connect with a Mila academic advisor and current student-researchers to learn more about Mila's community and how to join us on August 19, 31 and September 11, 2026.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Continual reinforcement learning considers an agent receiving and learning from a stream of experience. The agent only learns about its worl… (see more)d through these experiences and aims to maximize its accumulated reward. A fundamental problem is to evaluate this agent using only its stream of experience, without assuming a particular structure of the world.
We outline a novel approach to this problem: Define an \textit{examiner} that observes the same stream of experience and, at every timestep, computes a \textit{perceived regret}, representing the agent's suboptimality gap in value from the examiner's perspective.
We empirically demonstrate how perceived regret can be a useful performance measure, applicable to arbitrary streams of experience.
Theoretically, we prove that there is no universal examiner, capable of accurately assessing all agents in any world but specific modeling biases can enable success in associated environments.
Further experiments show the flexibility of this approach and explore its nuances.
Loss of plasticity, trainability loss, and primacy bias have been identified as issues arising when training deep neural networks on sequenc… (see more)es of tasks -- all referring to the increased difficulty in training on new tasks. We propose to use Parseval regularization, which maintains orthogonality of weight matrices, to preserve useful optimization properties and improve training in a continual reinforcement learning setting. We show that it provides significant benefits to RL agents on a suite of gridworld, CARL and MetaWorld tasks. We conduct comprehensive ablations to identify the source of its benefits and investigate the effect of certain metrics associated to network trainability including weight matrix rank, weight norms and policy entropy.
2024-12-10
Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Accept (poster))
Bandit and reinforcement learning (RL) problems can often be framed as optimization problems where the goal is to maximize average performan… (see more)ce while having access only to stochastic estimates of the true gradient. Traditionally, stochastic optimization theory predicts that learning dynamics are governed by the curvature of the loss function and the noise of the gradient estimates. In this paper we demonstrate that this is not the case for bandit and RL problems. To allow our analysis to be interpreted in light of multi-step MDPs, we focus on techniques derived from stochastic optimization principles (e.g., natural policy gradient and EXP3) and we show that some standard assumptions from optimization theory are violated in these problems. We present theoretical results showing that, at least for bandit problems, curvature and noise are not sufficient to explain the learning dynamics and that seemingly innocuous choices like the baseline can determine whether an algorithm converges. These theoretical findings match our empirical evaluation, which we extend to multi-state MDPs.
2021-07-17
International Conference on Machine Learning (unknown)