Portrait of Doina Precup

Doina Precup

Core Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Associate Professor, McGill University, School of Computer Science
Research Team Leader, Google DeepMind
Research Topics
Medical Machine Learning
Molecular Modeling
Probabilistic Models
Reasoning
Reinforcement Learning

Biography

Doina Precup combines teaching at McGill University with fundamental research on reinforcement learning, in particular AI applications in areas of significant social impact, such as health care. She is interested in machine decision-making in situations where uncertainty is high.

In addition to heading the Montreal office of Google DeepMind, Precup is a Senior Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Her areas of speciality are artificial intelligence, machine learning, reinforcement learning, reasoning and planning under uncertainty, and applications.

Current Students

Research Intern - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
Master's Research - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - Birla Institute of Technology
Master's Research - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Master's Research - McGill University
PhD - Polytechnique Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Postdoctorate - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Master's Research - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
Research Intern - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
Research Intern - McGill University
PhD - McGill University
Master's Research - McGill University
Co-supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Co-supervisor :

Publications

The Geometry and Topology of Circuits: the Manifolds of Modular Addition
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduced to ar… (see more)gue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. In this work, we show that this is not the case, and that both the uniform and trainable attention architectures implement the same algorithm via topologically and geometrically equivalent representations. Our methodology goes beyond the interpretation of individual neurons and weights. Instead, we identify all of the neurons corresponding to each learned representation and then study the collective group of neurons as one entity. This method reveals that each learned representation is a manifold that we can study utilizing tools from topology. Based on this insight, we can statistically analyze the learned representations across hundreds of circuits to demonstrate the similarity between learned modular addition circuits that arise naturally from common deep learning paradigms.
On the geometry and topology of representations: the manifolds of modular addition
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduced to ar… (see more)gue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. In this work, we show that this is not the case, and that both uniform attention and trainable attention architectures implement the same algorithm via topologically and geometrically equivalent representations. Our methodology goes beyond the interpretation of individual neurons and weights. Instead, we identify all of the neurons corresponding to each learned representation and then study the collective group of neurons as one entity. This method reveals that each learned representation is a manifold that we can study utilizing tools from topology. Based on this insight, we can statistically analyze the learned representations across hundreds of circuits to demonstrate the similarity between learned modular addition circuits that arise naturally from common deep learning paradigms.
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
Andrew Y. Ng
Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Fernando Pereira
On Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for Coverage of Partially Observable Worlds
Shuo Wen
Louis-Roy Langevin
Antonio Lor'ia
Large Language Model Applications in the Algebra Domain: A Systematic Review
Excitatory-Inhibitory Dynamics in Adaptive Decision-Making
The Geometry and Topology of Modular Addition Representations
The Clock and Pizza interpretations, associated with neural architectures differing in either uniform or learnable attention, were introduce… (see more)d to argue that different architectural designs can yield distinct circuits for modular addition. Applying geometric and topological analyses to learned representations, we show that this is not the case: Clock and Pizza circuits are topologically and geometrically equivalent and are thus equivalent representations.
Reward the Reward Designer: Making Reinforcement Learning Useful for Clinical Decision Making
Adriana Romero
Unifying Mechanistic Interpretations of Neural Networks Trained on Modular Addition
Capturing Individual Human Preferences with Reward Features
Andre Barreto
Yiran Mao
Nicolas Perez-Nieves
Mark Rowland
Bobak Shahriari
Reinforcement learning from human feedback usually models preferences using a reward model that does not distinguish between people. We argu… (see more)e that this is unlikely to be a good design choice in contexts with high potential for disagreement, like in the training of large language models. We propose a method to specialise a reward model to a person or group of people. Our approach builds on the observation that individual preferences can be captured as a linear combination of a set of general reward features. We show how to learn such features and subsequently use them to quickly adapt the reward model to a specific individual, even if their preferences are not reflected in the training data. We present experiments with large language models comparing the proposed architecture with a non-adaptive reward model and also adaptive counterparts, including models that do in-context personalisation. Depending on how much disagreement there is in the training data, our model either significantly outperforms the baselines or matches their performance with a simpler architecture and more stable training.
Plasticity as the Mirror of Empowerment
David Abel
Michael Bowling
Andre Barreto
Will Dabney
Shi Dong
Steven Hansen
Anna Harutyunyan
Clare Lyle
Georgios Piliouras
Jonathan Richens
Mark Rowland
Tom Schaul
Satinder Singh
Agents are minimally entities that are influenced by their past observations and act to influence future observations. This latter capacity … (see more)is captured by empowerment, which has served as a vital framing concept across artificial intelligence and cognitive science. This former capacity, however, is equally foundational: In what ways, and to what extent, can an agent be influenced by what it observes? In this paper, we ground this concept in a universal agent-centric measure that we refer to as plasticity, and reveal a fundamental connection to empowerment. Following a set of desiderata on a suitable definition, we define plasticity using a new information-theoretic quantity we call the generalized directed information. We show that this new quantity strictly generalizes the directed information introduced by Massey (1990) while preserving all of its desirable properties. Under this definition, we find that plasticity is well thought of as the mirror of empowerment: The two concepts are defined using the same measure, with only the direction of influence reversed. Our main result establishes a tension between the plasticity and empowerment of an agent, suggesting that agent design needs to be mindful of both characteristics. We explore the implications of these findings, and suggest that plasticity, empowerment, and their relationship are essential to understanding agency
Uncovering a Universal Abstract Algorithm for Modular Addition in Neural Networks
We propose a testable universality hypothesis, asserting that seemingly disparate neural network solutions observed in the simple task of mo… (see more)dular addition are unified under a common abstract algorithm. While prior work interpreted variations in neuron-level representations as evidence for distinct algorithms, we demonstrate - through multi-level analyses spanning neurons, neuron clusters, and entire networks - that multilayer perceptrons and transformers universally implement the abstract algorithm we call the approximate Chinese Remainder Theorem. Crucially, we introduce approximate cosets and show that neurons activate exclusively on them. Furthermore, our theory works for deep neural networks (DNNs). It predicts that universally learned solutions in DNNs with trainable embeddings or more than one hidden layer require only O(log n) features, a result we empirically confirm. This work thus provides the first theory-backed interpretation of multilayer networks solving modular addition. It advances generalizable interpretability and opens a testable universality hypothesis for group multiplication beyond modular addition.