Doina Precup

busra-tugce.gurbuz@mila.quebec

Jesse Farebrother

Doctorat - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Marc Gendron-Bellemare

Doctorat - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Eilif B. Muller

Mohammad Sami Nur Islam Islam

Jonathan Hu

Maîtrise recherche - McGill

jonathan.hu@mila.quebec

Howard Huang

Doctorat - McGill

huanghow@mila.quebec

Maîtrise recherche - McGill

mohammad-sami-nur.islam@mila.quebec

Hangzhan Jin

Doctorat - Polytechnique

jinhangzhan@gmail.com

flemming.kondrup@mila.quebec

Flemming Kondrup

Postdoctorat - McGill

Jonathan Lebensold

Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill

Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill

jeremy.lucas@mila.quebec

Ray Luo

Doctorat - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Xujie Si

luo.ziyan@mila.quebec

Sicheng Lyu

Maîtrise recherche - McGill

sicheng.lyu@mila.quebec

G McCracken

Doctorat - McGill

mccrackg@mila.quebec

shahrad.mohammadzadeh@mila.quebec

Shahrad Mohammadzadeh

Maîtrise recherche - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Reihaneh Rabbany

padideh.nouri@mila.quebec

Gabriela Moisescu-Pareja

Collaborateur·rice de recherche - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Irina Rish

moisescg@mila.quebec

Padideh Nouri

Doctorat - UdeM

Doctorat - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Stagiaire de recherche - McGill

william.potter@mila.quebec

manoosh.samiei@mila.quebec

Nate Rahn

Doctorat - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Marc Gendron-Bellemare

nathan.rahn@mila.quebec

Mandana Samiei

Doctorat - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Blake Richards

samiemandana@gmail.com

Doctorat - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Paul Masset

Doctorat - McGill

Nishanth Anand Vemgal

Doctorat - McGill

Doctorat - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Samira Ebrahimi Kahou

Stagiaire de recherche - McGill

guangyuan.wang@mila.quebec

Zihan Wang

Doctorat - McGill

zihan.wang@mila.quebec

shuyuan.zhang@mila.quebec

Steve Wen

Maîtrise recherche - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Gregory Dudek

steve.wen@mila.quebec

Zijing Wu

Doctorat - McGill

Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :

Paul Masset

zijing.wu@mila.quebec

Doctorat - McGill

Harry Zhao

Collaborateur·rice alumni - McGill

Co-superviseur⋅e :

Billets de blogue

Generic thumbnail for Mila Blog articles.

22 février 2024

Skipper : combiner l’abstraction spatiale et temporelle afin d’améliorer la généralisation

par

Mingde Harry Zhao

Safa Alver

Harm van Seijen

Romain Laroche

Doina Precup

Yoshua Bengio

Lire l'article

Publications

Deep learning, reinforcement learning, and world models

Yu Matsuo

Yann Lecun

Maneesh Sahani

David Silver

Masashi Sugiyama

Eiji Uchibe

J. Morimoto

2022-03-31

Neural Networks (publié)

Selective Credit Assignment

Veronica Chelu

Diana Borsa

Hado Philip van Hasselt

2022-02-19

arXiv (prépublication)

Improving Sample Efficiency of Value Based Models Using Attention and Vision Transformers

Amir Ardalan Kalantari

Mohammad Amini

Sarath Chandar

Much of recent Deep Reinforcement Learning success is owed to the neural architecture's potential to learn and use effective internal repres… (voir plus)entations of the world. While many current algorithms access a simulator to train with a large amount of data, in realistic settings, including while playing games that may be played against people, collecting experience can be quite costly. In this paper, we introduce a deep reinforcement learning architecture whose purpose is to increase sample efficiency without sacrificing performance. We design this architecture by incorporating advances achieved in recent years in the field of Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision. Specifically, we propose a visually attentive model that uses transformers to learn a self-attention mechanism on the feature maps of the state representation, while simultaneously optimizing return. We demonstrate empirically that this architecture improves sample complexity for several Atari environments, while also achieving better performance in some of the games.

2022-01-31

arXiv (prépublication)

COptiDICE: Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation

Jongmin Lee

Cosmin Paduraru

Daniel J Mankowitz

Nicolas Heess

Kee-Eung Kim

Arthur Guez

We consider the offline constrained reinforcement learning (RL) problem, in which the agent aims to compute a policy that maximizes expected… (voir plus) return while satisfying given cost constraints, learning only from a pre-collected dataset. This problem setting is appealing in many real-world scenarios, where direct interaction with the environment is costly or risky, and where the resulting policy should comply with safety constraints. However, it is challenging to compute a policy that guarantees satisfying the cost constraints in the offline RL setting, since the off-policy evaluation inherently has an estimation error. In this paper, we present an offline constrained RL algorithm that optimizes the policy in the space of the stationary distribution. Our algorithm, COptiDICE, directly estimates the stationary distribution corrections of the optimal policy with respect to returns, while constraining the cost upper bound, with the goal of yielding a cost-conservative policy for actual constraint satisfaction. Experimental results show that COptiDICE attains better policies in terms of constraint satisfaction and return-maximization, outperforming baseline algorithms.

2022-01-27

ICLR.cc/2022/Conference (spotlight)

openreview.net

The Paradox of Choice: Using Attention in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

Andrei Cristian Nica

Khimya Khetarpal

2022-01-23

ArXiv (prépublication)

Appendix: On the Expressivity of Markov Reward

David Abel

Will Dabney

Anna Harutyunyan

Mark K. Ho

Michael L. Littman

Satinder Singh

(Q1) What does it mean for Bob to *solve* one of these tasks? That is, if Alice chooses a SOAP, PO, or TO for Bob to learn to solve, when ca… (voir plus)n Alice determine Bob has solved the task? A: Bob can be said to be doing better on a given task if his behavior improves, as is typical in evaluating behavior under reward. The difference with SOAPs, POs, and TOs is that we measure improvement relative to the task rather than reward. For instance, given a SOAP, we might say that Bob has solved the task once he has found one of the good policies, and we might measure Bob’s progress on a task in terms of the distance of his greedy policy to one of the good policies (as done in our learning experiments). The same reasoning applies to POs and TOs: Bob is doing better on a task in so far as his greedy policy (or trajectories) is (are) higher up the ordering.

2021-12-31

(publié)

www.semanticscholar.org

Behind the Machine's Gaze: Biologically Constrained Neural Networks Exhibit Human-like Visual Attention

Leo Schwinn

B. Eskofier

Dario Zanca

2021-12-31

arXiv.org (prépublication)

Low-Rank Representation of Reinforcement Learning Policies

Thang Doan

Guillaume Rabuseau

We propose a general framework for policy representation for reinforcement learning tasks. This framework involves finding a low-dimensional… (voir plus) embedding of the policy on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The usage of RKHS based methods allows us to derive strong theoretical guarantees on the expected return of the reconstructed policy. Such guarantees are typically lacking in black-box models, but are very desirable in tasks requiring stability and convergence guarantees. We conduct several experiments on classic RL domains. The results confirm that the policies can be robustly represented in a low-dimensional space while the embedded policy incurs almost no decrease in returns.

2021-12-31

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (publié)

Importance of Empirical Sample Complexity Analysis for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Samin Yeasar Arnob

Riashat Islam

2021-12-30

ArXiv (prépublication)

Single-Shot Pruning for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Samin Yeasar Arnob

Riyasat Ohib

Sergey Plis

2021-12-30

arXiv (prépublication)

A Consciousness-Inspired Planning Agent for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Mingde Zhao

We present an end-to-end, model-based deep reinforcement learning agent which dynamically attends to relevant parts of its state during plan… (voir plus)ning. The agent uses a bottleneck mechanism over a set-based representation to force the number of entities to which the agent attends at each planning step to be small. In experiments, we investigate the bottleneck mechanism with several sets of customized environments featuring different challenges. We consistently observe that the design allows the planning agents to generalize their learned task-solving abilities in compatible unseen environments by attending to the relevant objects, leading to better out-of-distribution generalization performance.

2021-12-06

Neural Information Processing Systems (Accept (Poster))

openreview.net

Flexible Option Learning

Martin Klissarov

Temporal abstraction in reinforcement learning (RL), offers the promise of improving generalization and knowledge transfer in complex enviro… (voir plus)nments, by propagating information more efficiently over time. Although option learning was initially formulated in a way that allows updating many options simultaneously, using off-policy, intra-option learning (Sutton, Precup & Singh, 1999), many of the recent hierarchical reinforcement learning approaches only update a single option at a time: the option currently executing. We revisit and extend intra-option learning in the context of deep reinforcement learning, in order to enable updating all options consistent with current primitive action choices, without introducing any additional estimates. Our method can therefore be naturally adopted in most hierarchical RL frameworks. When we combine our approach with the option-critic algorithm for option discovery, we obtain significant improvements in performance and data-efficiency across a wide variety of domains.

2021-12-06

NEURIPS (Accept (Spotlight))