Portrait de Guillaume Lajoie

Guillaume Lajoie

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur agrégé, Université de Montréal, Département de mathématiques et statistiques
Chercheur invité, Google
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage de représentations
Apprentissage profond
Cognition
IA en santé
IA pour la science
Neurosciences computationnelles
Optimisation
Raisonnement
Réseaux de neurones récurrents
Systèmes dynamiques

Biographie

Guillaume Lajoie est professeur agrégé au Département de mathématiques et de statistiques (DMS) de l'Université de Montréal et membre académique principal de Mila – Institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle. Il est titulaire d'une chaire CIFAR (CCAI Canada) ainsi que d'une chaire de recherche du Canada (CRC) en calcul et interfaçage neuronaux.

Auparavant, Guillaume Lajoie a été chercheur postdoctoral à l'Institut de dynamique et d'auto-organisation Max-Planck et à l'Institut de neuro-ingénierie de l'Université de Washington. Il a obtenu son doctorat à l'Université de Washington (Seattle), au Département de mathématiques appliquées.

Ses recherches sont positionnées à l'intersection de l'IA et des neurosciences où il développe des outils pour mieux comprendre les mécanismes d'intelligence communs aux systèmes biologiques et artificiels. Les contributions de son groupe de recherche vont des progrès des paradigmes d'apprentissage à plusieurs échelles pour les grands systèmes artificiels aux applications en neurotechnologie. Dr. Lajoie participe activement aux efforts de développement responsables de l'IA, cherchant à identifier les lignes directrices et les meilleures pratiques pour l'utilisation de l'IA dans la recherche et au-delà.

Ses récentes recherches se concentrent sur le développement de biais inductifs architecturaux pour la propagation de l'information dans les réseaux récurrents, ainsi que le développement d'algorithmes et de modèles pour l'optimisation de l'interface bidirectionnelle cerveau-machine.

Étudiants actuels

Visiteur de recherche indépendant
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Maîtrise recherche - Polytechnique
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - Polytechnique
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - Western Washington University (faculty; assistant prof))
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Postdoctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Stagiaire de recherche - Western Washington University
Co-superviseur⋅e :

Publications

Brain-like learning with exponentiated gradients
Jonathan Cornford
Roman Pogodin
Arna Ghosh
Kaiwen Sheng
Brendan A. Bicknell
Olivier Codol
Beverley A. Clark
Multi-agent cooperation through learning-aware policy gradients
Alexander Meulemans
Seijin Kobayashi
Johannes von Oswald
Nino Scherrer
Eric Elmoznino
Blaise Agüera y Arcas
João Sacramento
Self-interested individuals often fail to cooperate, posing a fundamental challenge for multi-agent learning. How can we achieve cooperation… (voir plus) among self-interested, independent learning agents? Promising recent work has shown that in certain tasks cooperation can be established between learning-aware agents who model the learning dynamics of each other. Here, we present the first unbiased, higher-derivative-free policy gradient algorithm for learning-aware reinforcement learning, which takes into account that other agents are themselves learning through trial and error based on multiple noisy trials. We then leverage efficient sequence models to condition behavior on long observation histories that contain traces of the learning dynamics of other agents. Training long-context policies with our algorithm leads to cooperative behavior and high returns on standard social dilemmas, including a challenging environment where temporally-extended action coordination is required. Finally, we derive from the iterated prisoner's dilemma a novel explanation for how and when cooperation arises among self-interested learning-aware agents.
A Complexity-Based Theory of Compositionality
Eric Elmoznino
Thomas Jiralerspong
Learning Stochastic Rainbow Networks
Vivian White
Muawiz Sajjad Chaudhary
Kameron Decker Harris
Random feature models are a popular approach for studying network learning that can capture important behaviors while remaining simpler than… (voir plus) traditional training. Guth et al. [2024] introduced “rainbow” networks which model the distribution of trained weights as correlated random features conditioned on previous layer activity. Sampling new weights from distributions fit to learned networks led to similar performance in entirely untrained networks, and the observed weight covariance were found to be low rank. This provided evidence that random feature models could be extended to some networks away from initialization, but White et al. [2024] failed to replicate their results in the deeper ResNet18 architecture. Here we ask whether the rainbow formulation can succeed in deeper networks by directly training a stochastic ensemble of random features, which we call stochastic rainbow networks. At every gradient descent iteration, new weights are sampled for all intermediate layers and features aligned layer-wise. We find: (1) this approach scales to deeper models, which outperform shallow networks at large widths; (2) ensembling multiple samples from the stochastic model is better than retraining the classifier head; and (3) low-rank parameterization of the learnable weight covariances can approach the accuracy of full-rank networks. This offers more evidence for rainbow and other structured random feature networks as reduced models of deep learning.
The oneirogen hypothesis: modeling the hallucinatory effects of classical psychedelics in terms of replay-dependent plasticity mechanisms
Colin Bredenberg
Fabrice Normandin
Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting Networks
Neural network training can be accelerated when a learnable update rule is used in lieu of classic adaptive optimizers (e.g. Adam). However,… (voir plus) learnable update rules can be costly and unstable to train and use. A simpler recently proposed approach to accelerate training is to use Adam for most of the optimization steps and periodically, only every few steps, nowcast (predict future) parameters. We improve this approach by Neuron interaction and Nowcasting (NiNo) networks. NiNo leverages neuron connectivity and graph neural networks to more accurately nowcast parameters by learning in a supervised way from a set of training trajectories over multiple tasks. We show that in some networks, such as Transformers, neuron connectivity is non-trivial. By accurately modeling neuron connectivity, we allow NiNo to accelerate Adam training by up to 50\% in vision and language tasks.
When can transformers compositionally generalize in-context?
Seijin Kobayashi
Simon Schug
Yassir Akram
Florian Redhardt
Johannes von Oswald
Razvan Pascanu
João Sacramento
Many tasks can be composed from a few independent components. This gives rise to a combinatorial explosion of possible tasks, only some of w… (voir plus)hich might be encountered during training. Under what circumstances can transformers compositionally generalize from a subset of tasks to all possible combinations of tasks that share similar components? Here we study a modular multitask setting that allows us to precisely control compositional structure in the data generation process. We present evidence that transformers learning in-context struggle to generalize compositionally on this task despite being in principle expressive enough to do so. Compositional generalization becomes possible only when introducing a bottleneck that enforces an explicit separation between task inference and task execution.
Expressivity of Neural Networks with Random Weights and Learned Biases
Ezekiel Williams
Avery Hee-Woon Ryoo
Thomas Jiralerspong
Alexandre Payeur
Luca Mazzucato
Using neural biomarkers to personalize dosing of vagus nerve stimulation
Antonin Berthon
Lorenz Wernisch
Myrta Stoukidi
Michael Thornton
Olivier Tessier-Lariviere
Pascal Fortier-Poisson
Jorin Mamen
Max Pinkney
Susannah Lee
Elvijs Sarkans
Luca Annecchino
Ben Appleton
Philip Garsed
Bret Patterson
Samuel Gonshaw
Matjaž Jakopec
Sudhakaran Shunmugam
Tristan Edwards
Aleksi Tukiainen
Joel Jennings … (voir 3 de plus)
Emil Hewage
Oliver Armitage
Expressivity of Neural Networks with Fixed Weights and Learned Biases
Ezekiel Williams
Avery Hee-Woon Ryoo
Thomas Jiralerspong
Alexandre Payeur
Luca Mazzucato
Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?
Sarthak Mittal
Eric Elmoznino
L'eo Gagnon
Sangnie Bhardwaj
Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting ave… (voir plus)nues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or if they instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts enabled by attention layers. Both scenarios have inspired active ongoing work. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We minimally modify the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck designed to prevent shortcuts in favor of more structured solutions, and then compare performance against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks. Contrary to intuition and some recent works, we find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem.
Assistive sensory-motor perturbations influence learned neural representations
Pavithra Rajeswaran
Alexandre Payeur
Amy L. Orsborn
Task errors are used to learn and refine motor skills. We investigated how task assistance influences learned neural representations using B… (voir plus)rain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs), which map neural activity into movement via a decoder. We analyzed motor cortex activity as monkeys practiced BCI with a decoder that adapted to improve or maintain performance over days. Population dimensionality remained constant or increased with learning, counter to trends with non-adaptive BCIs. Yet, over time, task information was contained in a smaller subset of neurons or population modes. Moreover, task information was ultimately stored in neural modes that occupied a small fraction of the population variance. An artificial neural network model suggests the adaptive decoders contribute to forming these compact neural representations. Our findings show that assistive decoders manipulate error information used for long-term learning computations, like credit assignment, which informs our understanding of motor learning and has implications for designing real-world BCIs.