Les inscriptions sont ouvertes pour notre programme de 4 mois à temps plein, à Mila, conçu spécifiquement pour les fondateurs et fondatrices de la deep tech issus de parcours d'élite en STIM. Vous avez jusqu'au 21 novembre 2026 pour appliquer!
Offert par Mila et le Forum des politiques publiques, ce programme est conçu pour outiller les décideur·euse·s et les responsables des politiques publiques à naviguer efficacement à travers les opportunités et les risques liés à l'IA. La prochaine cohorte se tiendra en anglais les 5 et 6 novembre 2026 à Ottawa.
Le processus de demandes de supervision à Mila est maintenant ouvert! Vous pouvez appliquer dès maintenant à la maitrise de recherche ou Doctorat et joindre notre grande communauté de chercheur·euse·s à Mila pour l’automne 2027. Date limite : 1er décembre 2026
Nous utilisons des témoins pour analyser le trafic et l’utilisation de notre site web, afin de personnaliser votre expérience. Vous pouvez désactiver ces technologies à tout moment, mais cela peut restreindre certaines fonctionnalités du site. Consultez notre Politique de protection de la vie privée pour en savoir plus.
Paramètre des cookies
Vous pouvez activer et désactiver les types de cookies que vous souhaitez accepter. Cependant certains choix que vous ferez pourraient affecter les services proposés sur nos sites (ex : suggestions, annonces personnalisées, etc.).
Cookies essentiels
Ces cookies sont nécessaires au fonctionnement du site et ne peuvent être désactivés. (Toujours actif)
Cookies analyse
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour mesurer l'audience de nos sites ?
Lecteur Multimédia
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour afficher et vous permettre de regarder les contenus vidéo hébergés par nos partenaires (YouTube, etc.) ?
Artificial neural networks trained with gradient descent (GD) are widely used to model brain learning, but GD allows synapses to switch betw… (voir plus)een excitatory and inhibitory and produces weight distributions unlike those observed experimentally. We show that an alternative rule, exponentiated gradient (EG), avoids these problems because its multiplicative, exponential weight updates mathematically prohibit synapses from changing sign and preferentially scale already-large weights, naturally generating log-normal distributions. This mechanism also concentrates task-relevant computation onto a smaller subset of strong connections, which we show makes EG-trained recurrent neural networks more robust to synaptic pruning and better able to learn from sparsely relevant inputs than GD-trained networks, while matching GD's performance on standard cognitive tasks. These findings tie a normative optimization principle directly to observed features of synaptic organization in the brain.
Computational neuroscience relies on gradient descent (GD) for training artificial neural network (ANN) models of the brain. The advantage o… (voir plus)f GD is that it is effective at learning difficult tasks. However, it produces ANNs that are a poor phenomenological fit to biology, making them less relevant as models of the brain. Specifically, it violates Dale’s law, by allowing synapses to change from excitatory to inhibitory, and leads to synaptic weights that are not log-normally distributed, contradicting experimental data. Here, starting from first principles of optimisation theory, we present an alternative learning algorithm, exponentiated gradient (EG), that respects Dale’s Law and produces log-normal weights, without losing the power of learning with gradients. We also show that in biologically relevant settings EG outperforms GD, including learning from sparsely relevant signals and dealing with synaptic pruning. Altogether, our results show that EG is a superior learning algorithm for modelling the brain with ANNs.
A growing literature in computational neuroscience leverages gradient descent and learning algorithms that approximate it to study synaptic … (voir plus)plasticity in the brain. However, the vast majority of this work ignores a critical underlying assumption: the choice of distance for synaptic changes - i.e. the geometry of synaptic plasticity. Gradient descent assumes that the distance is Euclidean, but many other distances are possible, and there is no reason that biology necessarily uses Euclidean geometry. Here, using the theoretical tools provided by mirror descent, we show that the distribution of synaptic weights will depend on the geometry of synaptic plasticity. We use these results to show that experimentally-observed log-normal weight distributions found in several brain areas are not consistent with standard gradient descent (i.e. a Euclidean geometry), but rather with non-Euclidean distances. Finally, we show that it should be possible to experimentally test for different synaptic geometries by comparing synaptic weight distributions before and after learning. Overall, our work shows that the current paradigm in theoretical work on synaptic plasticity that assumes Euclidean synaptic geometry may be misguided and that it should be possible to experimentally determine the true geometry of synaptic plasticity in the brain.
2024-05-06
International Conference on Learning Representations (Accept (spotlight))