Portrait de Gauthier Gidel

Gauthier Gidel

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur adjoint, Université de Montréal, Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage par renforcement
Modèles génératifs
Optimisation
Théorie de l'apprentissage automatique

Biographie

Je suis professeur adjoint au Département d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle (DIRO) de l'Université de Montréal et membre académique principal de Mila – Institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle. J'ai obtenu une bourse Borealis AI destinée aux étudiant·e·s des cycles supérieurs et je suis actuellement titulaire d'une chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR. J'ai travaillé chez DeepMind et Element AI, et j'ai récemment été un visiteur de longue durée au Simons Institute de l’Université de Californie à Berkeley. Mes intérêts de recherche se situent à l'intersection de la théorie des jeux, de l'optimisation et de l'apprentissage automatique.

Étudiants actuels

Visiteur de recherche indépendant - UBC
Maîtrise recherche - Polytechnique
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice alumni - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Postdoctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - Technical Univeristy of Munich
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Visiteur de recherche indépendant - N/A

Publications

Tight Lower Bounds and Improved Convergence in Performative Prediction
Pedram J. Khorsandi
Rushil Gupta
Mehrnaz Mofakhami
Performative prediction is a framework accounting for the shift in the data distribution induced by the prediction of a model deployed in th… (voir plus)e real world. Ensuring rapid convergence to a stable solution where the data distribution remains the same after the model deployment is crucial, especially in evolving environments. This paper extends the Repeated Risk Minimization (RRM) framework by utilizing historical datasets from previous retraining snapshots, yielding a class of algorithms that we call Affine Risk Minimizers and enabling convergence to a performatively stable point for a broader class of problems. We introduce a new upper bound for methods that use only the final iteration of the dataset and prove for the first time the tightness of both this new bound and the previous existing bounds within the same regime. We also prove that utilizing historical datasets can surpass the lower bound for last iterate RRM, and empirically observe faster convergence to the stable point on various performative prediction benchmarks. We offer at the same time the first lower bound analysis for RRM within the class of Affine Risk Minimizers, quantifying the potential improvements in convergence speed that could be achieved with other variants in our framework.
Tight Lower Bounds and Improved Convergence in Performative Prediction
Pedram J. Khorsandi
Rushil Gupta
Mehrnaz Mofakhami
Performative prediction is a framework accounting for the shift in the data distribution induced by the prediction of a model deployed in th… (voir plus)e real world. Ensuring rapid convergence to a stable solution where the data distribution remains the same after the model deployment is crucial, especially in evolving environments. This paper extends the Repeated Risk Minimization (RRM) framework by utilizing historical datasets from previous retraining snapshots, yielding a class of algorithms that we call Affine Risk Minimizers and enabling convergence to a performatively stable point for a broader class of problems. We introduce a new upper bound for methods that use only the final iteration of the dataset and prove for the first time the tightness of both this new bound and the previous existing bounds within the same regime. We also prove that utilizing historical datasets can surpass the lower bound for last iterate RRM, and empirically observe faster convergence to the stable point on various performative prediction benchmarks. We offer at the same time the first lower bound analysis for RRM within the class of Affine Risk Minimizers, quantifying the potential improvements in convergence speed that could be achieved with other variants in our framework.
Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Losses
Ryan D'Orazio
Danilo Vucetic
Zichu Liu
Junhyung Lyle Kim
Deep learning has proven to be effective in a wide variety of loss minimization problems. However, many applications of interest, like minim… (voir plus)izing projected Bellman error and min-max optimization, cannot be modelled as minimizing a scalar loss function but instead correspond to solving a variational inequality (VI) problem. This difference in setting has caused many practical challenges as naive gradient-based approaches from supervised learning tend to diverge and cycle in the VI case. In this work, we propose a principled surrogate-based approach compatible with deep learning to solve VIs. We show that our surrogate-based approach has three main benefits: (1) under assumptions that are realistic in practice (when hidden monotone structure is present, interpolation, and sufficient optimization of the surrogates), it guarantees convergence, (2) it provides a unifying perspective of existing methods, and (3) is amenable to existing deep learning optimizers like ADAM. Experimentally, we demonstrate our surrogate-based approach is effective in min-max optimization and minimizing projected Bellman error. Furthermore, in the deep reinforcement learning case, we propose a novel variant of TD(0) which is more compute and sample efficient.
Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Losses
Ryan D'Orazio
Danilo Vucetic
Zichu Liu
Junhyung Lyle Kim
Deep learning has proven to be effective in a wide variety of loss minimization problems. However, many applications of interest, like minim… (voir plus)izing projected Bellman error and min-max optimization, cannot be modelled as minimizing a scalar loss function but instead correspond to solving a variational inequality (VI) problem. This difference in setting has caused many practical challenges as naive gradient-based approaches from supervised learning tend to diverge and cycle in the VI case. In this work, we propose a principled surrogate-based approach compatible with deep learning to solve VIs. We show that our surrogate-based approach has three main benefits: (1) under assumptions that are realistic in practice (when hidden monotone structure is present, interpolation, and sufficient optimization of the surrogates), it guarantees convergence, (2) it provides a unifying perspective of existing methods, and (3) is amenable to existing deep learning optimizers like ADAM. Experimentally, we demonstrate our surrogate-based approach is effective in min-max optimization and minimizing projected Bellman error. Furthermore, in the deep reinforcement learning case, we propose a novel variant of TD(0) which is more compute and sample efficient.
General Causal Imputation via Synthetic Interventions
Marco Jiralerspong
Thomas Jiralerspong
Vedant Shah
Given two sets of elements (such as cell types and drug compounds), researchers typically only have access to a limited subset of their inte… (voir plus)ractions. The task of causal imputation involves using this subset to predict unobserved interactions. Squires et al. (2022) have proposed two estimators for this task based on the synthetic interventions (SI) estimator: SI-A (for actions) and SI-C (for contexts). We extend their work and introduce a novel causal imputation estimator, generalized synthetic interventions (GSI). We prove the identifiability of this estimator for data generated from a more complex latent factor model. On synthetic and real data we show empirically that it recovers or outperforms their estimators.
General Causal Imputation via Synthetic Interventions
Marco Jiralerspong
Thomas Jiralerspong
Vedant Shah
Given two sets of elements (such as cell types and drug compounds), researchers typically only have access to a limited subset of their inte… (voir plus)ractions. The task of causal imputation involves using this subset to predict unobserved interactions. Squires et al. (2022) have proposed two estimators for this task based on the synthetic interventions (SI) estimator: SI-A (for actions) and SI-C (for contexts). We extend their work and introduce a novel causal imputation estimator, generalized synthetic interventions (GSI). We prove the identifiability of this estimator for data generated from a more complex latent factor model. On synthetic and real data we show empirically that it recovers or outperforms their estimators.
General Causal Imputation via Synthetic Interventions
Marco Jiralerspong
Thomas Jiralerspong
Vedant Shah
Investigating the Benefits of Nonlinear Action Maps in Data-Driven Teleoperation
Michael Przystupa
Matthew E. Taylor
Martin Jägersand
Justus Piater
Samuele Tosatto
As robots become more common for both able-bodied individuals and those living with a disability, it is increasingly important that lay peop… (voir plus)le be able to drive multi-degree-of-freedom platforms with low-dimensional controllers. One approach is to use state-conditioned action mapping methods to learn mappings between low-dimensional controllers and high DOF manipulators -- prior research suggests these mappings can simplify the teleoperation experience for users. Recent works suggest that neural networks predicting a local linear function are superior to the typical end-to-end multi-layer perceptrons because they allow users to more easily undo actions, providing more control over the system. However, local linear models assume actions exist on a linear subspace and may not capture nuanced actions in training data. We observe that the benefit of these mappings is being an odd function concerning user actions, and propose end-to-end nonlinear action maps which achieve this property. Unfortunately, our experiments show that such modifications offer minimal advantages over previous solutions. We find that nonlinear odd functions behave linearly for most of the control space, suggesting architecture structure improvements are not the primary factor in data-driven teleoperation. Our results suggest other avenues, such as data augmentation techniques and analysis of human behavior, are necessary for action maps to become practical in real-world applications, such as in assistive robotics to improve the quality of life of people living with w disability.
Local Linearity is All You Need (in Data-Driven Teleoperation)
Michael Przystupa
Matthew E. Taylor
Martin Jägersand
Justus Piater
Samuele Tosatto
One of the critical aspects of assistive robotics is to provide a control system of a high-dimensional robot from a low-dimensional user inp… (voir plus)ut (i.e. a 2D joystick). Data-driven teleoperation seeks to provide an intuitive user interface called an action map to map the low dimensional input to robot velocities from human demonstrations. Action maps are machine learning models trained on robotic demonstration data to map user input directly to desired movements as opposed to aspects of robot pose ("move to cup or pour content" vs. "move along x- or y-axis"). Many works have investigated nonlinear action maps with multi-layer perceptrons, but recent work suggests that local-linear neural approximations provide better control of the system. However, local linear models assume actions exist on a linear subspace and may not capture nuanced motions in training data. In this work, we hypothesize that local-linear neural networks are effective because they make the action map odd w.r.t. the user input, enhancing the intuitiveness of the controller. Based on this assumption, we propose two nonlinear means of encoding odd behavior that do not constrain the action map to a local linear function. However, our analysis reveals that these models effectively behave like local linear models for relevant mappings between user joysticks and robot movements. We support this claim in simulation, and show on a realworld use case that there is no statistical benefit of using non-linear maps, according to the users experience. These negative results suggest that further investigation into model architectures beyond local linear models may offer diminishing returns for improving user experience in data-driven teleoperation systems.
Local Linearity is All You Need (in Data-Driven Teleoperation)
Michael Przystupa
Matthew E. Taylor
Martin Jägersand
Justus Piater
Samuele Tosatto
One of the critical aspects of assistive robotics is to provide a control system of a high-dimensional robot from a low-dimensional user inp… (voir plus)ut (i.e. a 2D joystick). Data-driven teleoperation seeks to provide an intuitive user interface called an action map to map the low dimensional input to robot velocities from human demonstrations. Action maps are machine learning models trained on robotic demonstration data to map user input directly to desired movements as opposed to aspects of robot pose ("move to cup or pour content" vs. "move along x- or y-axis"). Many works have investigated nonlinear action maps with multi-layer perceptrons, but recent work suggests that local-linear neural approximations provide better control of the system. However, local linear models assume actions exist on a linear subspace and may not capture nuanced motions in training data. In this work, we hypothesize that local-linear neural networks are effective because they make the action map odd w.r.t. the user input, enhancing the intuitiveness of the controller. Based on this assumption, we propose two nonlinear means of encoding odd behavior that do not constrain the action map to a local linear function. However, our analysis reveals that these models effectively behave like local linear models for relevant mappings between user joysticks and robot movements. We support this claim in simulation, and show on a realworld use case that there is no statistical benefit of using non-linear maps, according to the users experience. These negative results suggest that further investigation into model architectures beyond local linear models may offer diminishing returns for improving user experience in data-driven teleoperation systems.
Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attacks
Sophie Xhonneux
Stephan Günnemann
Leo Schwinn
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can bypass their safety guardrails. In many domains, adversarial tra… (voir plus)ining has proven to be one of the most promising methods to reliably improve robustness against such attacks. Yet, in the context of LLMs, current methods for adversarial training are hindered by the high computational costs required to perform discrete adversarial attacks at each training iteration. We address this problem by instead calculating adversarial attacks in the continuous embedding space of the LLM, which is orders of magnitudes more efficient. We propose a fast adversarial training algorithm (C-AdvUL) composed of two losses: the first makes the model robust on continuous embedding attacks computed on an adversarial behaviour dataset; the second ensures the usefulness of the final model by fine-tuning on utility data. Moreover, we introduce C-AdvIPO, an adversarial variant of IPO that does not require utility data for adversarially robust alignment. Our empirical evaluation on five models from different families (Gemma, Phi3, Mistral, Zephyr, Llama2) and at different scales (2B, 3.8B, 7B) shows that both algorithms substantially enhance LLM robustness against discrete attacks (GCG, AutoDAN, PAIR), while maintaining utility. Our results demonstrate that robustness to continuous perturbations can extrapolate to discrete threat models. Thereby, we present a path toward scalable adversarial training algorithms for robustly aligning LLMs.
Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferences
Damien Ferbach
Quentin Bertrand
Joey Bose
The rapid progress in generative models has resulted in impressive leaps in generation quality, blurring the lines between synthetic and rea… (voir plus)l data. Web-scale datasets are now prone to the inevitable contamination by synthetic data, directly impacting the training of future generated models. Already, some theoretical results on self-consuming generative models (a.k.a., iterative retraining) have emerged in the literature, showcasing that either model collapse or stability could be possible depending on the fraction of generated data used at each retraining step. However, in practice, synthetic data is often subject to human feedback and curated by users before being used and uploaded online. For instance, many interfaces of popular text-to-image generative models, such as Stable Diffusion or Midjourney, produce several variations of an image for a given query which can eventually be curated by the users. In this paper, we theoretically study the impact of data curation on iterated retraining of generative models and show that it can be seen as an \emph{implicit preference optimization mechanism}. However, unlike standard preference optimization, the generative model does not have access to the reward function or negative samples needed for pairwise comparisons. Moreover, our study doesn't require access to the density function, only to samples. We prove that, if the data is curated according to a reward model, then the expected reward of the iterative retraining procedure is maximized. We further provide theoretical results on the stability of the retraining loop when using a positive fraction of real data at each step. Finally, we conduct illustrative experiments on both synthetic datasets and on CIFAR10 showing that such a procedure amplifies biases of the reward model.