Portrait de Guillaume Lajoie

Guillaume Lajoie

Membre académique principal
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur agrégé, Université de Montréal, Département de mathématiques et statistiques
Chercheur invité, Google
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage de représentations
Apprentissage profond
Cognition
IA en santé
IA pour la science
Neurosciences computationnelles
Optimisation
Raisonnement
Réseaux de neurones récurrents
Systèmes dynamiques

Biographie

Guillaume Lajoie est professeur agrégé au Département de mathématiques et de statistiques (DMS) de l'Université de Montréal et membre académique principal de Mila – Institut québécois d’intelligence artificielle. Il est titulaire d'une chaire CIFAR (CCAI Canada) ainsi que d'une chaire de recherche du Canada (CRC) en calcul et interfaçage neuronaux.

Ses recherches sont positionnées à l'intersection de l'IA et des neurosciences où il développe des outils pour mieux comprendre les mécanismes d'intelligence communs aux systèmes biologiques et artificiels. Les contributions de son groupe de recherche vont des progrès des paradigmes d'apprentissage à plusieurs échelles pour les grands systèmes artificiels aux applications en neurotechnologie. Dr. Lajoie participe activement aux efforts de développement responsables de l'IA, cherchant à identifier les lignes directrices et les meilleures pratiques pour l'utilisation de l'IA dans la recherche et au-delà.

Étudiants actuels

Collaborateur·rice de recherche - ETH Zurich
Visiteur de recherche indépendant
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Postdoctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Postdoctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - Polytechnique
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - McGill
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Stagiaire de recherche - Concordia
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Collaborateur·rice de recherche - UdeM
Collaborateur·rice de recherche
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Maîtrise recherche - UdeM
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Doctorat - UdeM
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Postdoctorat - UdeM

Publications

Multi-view manifold learning of human brain state trajectories
Erica Lindsey Busch
Je-chun Huang
Andrew Benz
Tom Wallenstein
Nicholas Turk-Browne
Transfer Entropy Bottleneck: Learning Sequence to Sequence Information Transfer
When presented with a data stream of two statistically dependent variables, predicting the future of one of the variables (the target stream… (voir plus)) can benefit from information about both its history and the history of the other variable (the source stream). For example, fluctuations in temperature at a weather station can be predicted using both temperatures and barometric readings. However, a challenge when modelling such data is that it is easy for a neural network to rely on the greatest joint correlations within the target stream, which may ignore a crucial but small information transfer from the source to the target stream. As well, there are often situations where the target stream may have previously been modelled independently and it would be useful to use that model to inform a new joint model. Here, we develop an information bottleneck approach for conditional learning on two dependent streams of data. Our method, which we call Transfer Entropy Bottleneck (TEB), allows one to learn a model that bottlenecks the directed information transferred from the source variable to the target variable, while quantifying this information transfer within the model. As such, TEB provides a useful new information bottleneck approach for modelling two statistically dependent streams of data in order to make predictions about one of them.
Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations
David Bergeron
Christian Iorio-Morin
Nathalie Orr Gaucher
Éric Racine
Alexander G. Weil
Steerable Equivariant Representation Learning
Willie McClinton
Tongzhou Wang
Chen Sun
Phillip Isola
Dilip Krishnan
Pre-trained deep image representations are useful for post-training tasks such as classification through transfer learning, image retrieval,… (voir plus) and object detection. Data augmentations are a crucial aspect of pre-training robust representations in both supervised and self-supervised settings. Data augmentations explicitly or implicitly promote invariance in the embedding space to the input image transformations. This invariance reduces generalization to those downstream tasks which rely on sensitivity to these particular data augmentations. In this paper, we propose a method of learning representations that are instead equivariant to data augmentations. We achieve this equivariance through the use of steerable representations. Our representations can be manipulated directly in embedding space via learned linear maps. We demonstrate that our resulting steerable and equivariant representations lead to better performance on transfer learning and robustness: e.g. we improve linear probe top-1 accuracy by between 1% to 3% for transfer; and ImageNet-C accuracy by upto 3.4%. We further show that the steerability of our representations provides significant speedup (nearly 50x) for test-time augmentations; by applying a large number of augmentations for out-of-distribution detection, we significantly improve OOD AUC on the ImageNet-C dataset over an invariant representation.
Sources of richness and ineffability for phenomenally conscious states
George Deane
Axel Constant
Jonathan Simon
Abstract Conscious states—state that there is something it is like to be in—seem both rich or full of detail and ineffable or hard to fu… (voir plus)lly describe or recall. The problem of ineffability, in particular, is a longstanding issue in philosophy that partly motivates the explanatory gap: the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to underlying physical processes. Here, we provide an information theoretic dynamical systems perspective on the richness and ineffability of consciousness. In our framework, the richness of conscious experience corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state and ineffability corresponds to the amount of information lost at different stages of processing. We describe how attractor dynamics in working memory would induce impoverished recollections of our original experiences, how the discrete symbolic nature of language is insufficient for describing the rich and high-dimensional structure of experiences, and how similarity in the cognitive function of two individuals relates to improved communicability of their experiences to each other. While our model may not settle all questions relating to the explanatory gap, it makes progress toward a fully physicalist explanation of the richness and ineffability of conscious experience—two important aspects that seem to be part of what makes qualitative character so puzzling.
Sources of richness and ineffability for phenomenally conscious states
George Deane
Axel Constant
Jonathan Simon
Abstract Conscious states—state that there is something it is like to be in—seem both rich or full of detail and ineffable or hard to fu… (voir plus)lly describe or recall. The problem of ineffability, in particular, is a longstanding issue in philosophy that partly motivates the explanatory gap: the belief that consciousness cannot be reduced to underlying physical processes. Here, we provide an information theoretic dynamical systems perspective on the richness and ineffability of consciousness. In our framework, the richness of conscious experience corresponds to the amount of information in a conscious state and ineffability corresponds to the amount of information lost at different stages of processing. We describe how attractor dynamics in working memory would induce impoverished recollections of our original experiences, how the discrete symbolic nature of language is insufficient for describing the rich and high-dimensional structure of experiences, and how similarity in the cognitive function of two individuals relates to improved communicability of their experiences to each other. While our model may not settle all questions relating to the explanatory gap, it makes progress toward a fully physicalist explanation of the richness and ineffability of conscious experience—two important aspects that seem to be part of what makes qualitative character so puzzling.
How gradient estimator variance and bias impact learning in neural networks
Yuhan Helena Liu
Konrad Paul Kording
There is growing interest in understanding how real brains may approximate gradients and how gradients can be used to train neuromorphic chi… (voir plus)ps. However, neither real brains nor neuromorphic chips can perfectly follow the loss gradient, so parameter updates would necessarily use gradient estimators that have some variance and/or bias. Therefore, there is a need to understand better how variance and bias in gradient estimators impact learning dependent on network and task properties. Here, we show that variance and bias can impair learning on the training data, but some degree of variance and bias in a gradient estimator can be beneficial for generalization. We find that the ideal amount of variance and bias in a gradient estimator are dependent on several properties of the network and task: the size and activity sparsity of the network, the norm of the gradient, and the curvature of the loss landscape. As such, whether considering biologically-plausible learning algorithms or algorithms for training neuromorphic chips, researchers can analyze these properties to determine whether their approximation to gradient descent will be effective for learning given their network and task properties.
Reliability of CKA as a Similarity Measure in Deep Learning
Comparing learned neural representations in neural networks is a challenging but important problem, which has been approached in different w… (voir plus)ays. The Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) similarity metric, particularly its linear variant, has recently become a popular approach and has been widely used to compare representations of a network's different layers, of architecturally similar networks trained differently, or of models with different architectures trained on the same data. A wide variety of claims about similarity and dissimilarity of these various representations have been made using CKA results. In this work we present analysis that formally characterizes CKA sensitivity to a large class of simple transformations, which can naturally occur in the context of modern machine learning. This provides a concrete explanation to CKA sensitivity to outliers, which has been observed in past works, and to transformations that preserve the linear separability of the data, an important generalization attribute. We empirically investigate several weaknesses of the CKA similarity metric, demonstrating situations in which it gives unexpected or counterintuitive results. Finally we study approaches for modifying representations to maintain functional behaviour while changing the CKA value. Our results illustrate that, in many cases, the CKA value can be easily manipulated without substantial changes to the functional behaviour of the models, and call for caution when leveraging activation alignment metrics.
« Que notre cerveau soit constitué de neurones n’est pas un accident »
Roman Ikonicoff
Formalizing locality for normative synaptic plasticity models
H OW GRADIENT ESTIMATOR VARIANCE AND BIAS COULD IMPACT LEARNING IN NEURAL CIRCUITS
Yuhan Helena Liu
Konrad K¨ording
There is growing interest in understanding how real brains may approximate gradients and how gradients can be used to train neuromorphic chi… (voir plus)ps. However, neither real brains nor neuromorphic chips can perfectly follow the loss gradient, so parameter updates would necessarily use gradient estimators that have some variance and/or bias. Therefore, there is a need to understand better how variance and bias in gradient estimators impact learning dependent on network and task properties. Here, we show that variance and bias can impair learning on the training data, but some degree of variance and bias in a gradient estimator can be beneficial for generalization. We find that the ideal amount of variance and bias in a gradient estimator are dependent on several properties of the network and task: the size and activity sparsity of the network, the norm of the gradient, and the curvature of the loss landscape. As such, whether considering biologically-plausible learning algorithms or algorithms for training neuromorphic chips, researchers can analyze these properties to determine whether their approximation to gradient descent will be effective for learning given their network and task properties.
LEAD: Min-Max Optimization from a Physical Perspective
Adversarial formulations have rekindled interest in two-player min-max games. A central obstacle in the optimization of such games is the ro… (voir plus)tational dynamics that hinder their convergence. In this paper, we show that game optimization shares dynamic properties with particle systems subject to multiple forces, and one can leverage tools from physics to improve optimization dynamics. Inspired by the physical framework, we propose LEAD, an optimizer for min-max games. Next, using Lyapunov stability theory from dynamical systems as well as spectral analysis, we study LEAD’s convergence properties in continuous and discrete time settings for a class of quadratic min-max games to demonstrate linear convergence to the Nash equilibrium. Finally, we empirically evaluate our method on synthetic setups and CIFAR-10 image generation to demonstrate improvements in GAN training.