Portrait of Yoshua Bengio

Yoshua Bengio

Core Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal, Department of Computer Science and Operations Research Department
Scientific Director, Leadership Team
Observer, Board of Directors, Mila
Research Topics
Causality
Computational Neuroscience
Deep Learning
Generative Models
Graph Neural Networks
Machine Learning Theory
Medical Machine Learning
Molecular Modeling
Natural Language Processing
Probabilistic Models
Reasoning
Recurrent Neural Networks
Reinforcement Learning
Representation Learning

Biography

*For media requests, please write to medias@mila.quebec.

For more information please contact Julie Mongeau, executive assistant at julie.mongeau@mila.quebec.

Yoshua Bengio is recognized worldwide as a leading expert in AI. He is most known for his pioneering work in deep learning, which earned him the 2018 A.M. Turing Award, “the Nobel Prize of computing,” with Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun.

Bengio is a full professor at Université de Montréal, and the founder and scientific director of Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute. He is also a senior fellow at CIFAR and co-directs its Learning in Machines & Brains program, serves as scientific director of IVADO, and holds a Canada CIFAR AI Chair.

In 2019, Bengio was awarded the prestigious Killam Prize and in 2022, he was the most cited computer scientist in the world by h-index. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of London, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, Knight of the Legion of Honor of France and Officer of the Order of Canada. In 2023, he was appointed to the UN’s Scientific Advisory Board for Independent Advice on Breakthroughs in Science and Technology.

Concerned about the social impact of AI, Bengio helped draft the Montréal Declaration for the Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence and continues to raise awareness about the importance of mitigating the potentially catastrophic risks associated with future AI systems.

Current Students

Research Intern - McGill University
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
Research Intern - Université du Québec à Rimouski
Independent visiting researcher
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - UQAR
PhD - Université de Montréal
Independent visiting researcher - MIT
Collaborating researcher - N/A
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - KAIST
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Université Paris-Saclay
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Barcelona University
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
Research Intern
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Independent visiting researcher - Technical University Munich (TUM)
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni
Research Intern - Imperial College London
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
Independent visiting researcher - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST)
Collaborating researcher - Ying Wu Coll of Computing
PhD - University of Waterloo
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Max-Planck-Institute for Intelligent Systems
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
Independent visiting researcher - Technical University of Munich
PhD - École Polytechnique Montréal Fédérale de Lausanne
Postdoctorate - Polytechnique Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Valence
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - RWTH Aachen University (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen)
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - KAIST
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :

Publications

A deep learning framework for neuroscience
Timothy P. Lillicrap
Philippe Beaudoin
Rafal Bogacz
Amelia Christensen
Claudia Clopath
Rui Ponte Costa
Archy de Berker
Surya Ganguli
Colleen J Gillon
Danijar Hafner
Adam Kepecs
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Peter Latham
Grace W. Lindsay
Kenneth D. Miller
Richard Naud
Christopher C. Pack
Panayiota Poirazi … (see 12 more)
Pieter Roelfsema
João Sacramento
Andrew Saxe
Benjamin Scellier
Anna C. Schapiro
Walter Senn
Greg Wayne
Daniel Yamins
Friedemann Zenke
Joel Zylberberg
Denis Therien
Konrad Paul Kording
Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learning
Vikas Verma
Kenji Kawaguchi
Alex Lamb
Juho Kannala
David Lopez-Paz
Arno Solin
On the interplay between noise and curvature and its effect on optimization and generalization
Valentin Thomas
Fabian Pedregosa
Bart van Merriënboer
Pierre-Antoine Mangazol
The speed at which one can minimize an expected loss using stochastic methods depends on two properties: the curvature of the loss and the v… (see more)ariance of the gradients. While most previous works focus on one or the other of these properties, we explore how their interaction affects optimization speed. Further, as the ultimate goal is good generalization performance, we clarify how both curvature and noise are relevant to properly estimate the generalization gap. Realizing that the limitations of some existing works stems from a confusion between these matrices, we also clarify the distinction between the Fisher matrix, the Hessian, and the covariance matrix of the gradients.
Information matrices and generalization
Valentin Thomas
Fabian Pedregosa
Bart van Merriënboer
Pierre-Antoine Manzagol
This work revisits the use of information criteria to characterize the generalization of deep learning models. In particular, we empirically… (see more) demonstrate the effectiveness of the Takeuchi information criterion (TIC), an extension of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) for misspecified models, in estimating the generalization gap, shedding light on why quantities such as the number of parameters cannot quantify generalization. The TIC depends on both the Hessian of the loss H and the covariance of the gradients C. By exploring the similarities and differences between these two matrices as well as the Fisher information matrix F, we study the interplay between noise and curvature in deep models. We also address the question of whether C is a reasonable approximation to F, as is commonly assumed.
Information matrices and generalization
Valentin Thomas
Fabian Pedregosa
Bart van Merriënboer
Pierre-Antoine Manzagol
This work revisits the use of information criteria to characterize the generalization of deep learning models. In particular, we empirically… (see more) demonstrate the effectiveness of the Takeuchi information criterion (TIC), an extension of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) for misspecified models, in estimating the generalization gap, shedding light on why quantities such as the number of parameters cannot quantify generalization. The TIC depends on both the Hessian of the loss H and the covariance of the gradients C. By exploring the similarities and differences between these two matrices as well as the Fisher information matrix F, we study the interplay between noise and curvature in deep models. We also address the question of whether C is a reasonable approximation to F, as is commonly assumed.
N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting
Boris Oreshkin
Dmitri Carpov
We focus on solving the univariate times series point forecasting problem using deep learning. We propose a deep neural architecture based o… (see more)n backward and forward residual links and a very deep stack of fully-connected layers. The architecture has a number of desirable properties, being interpretable, applicable without modification to a wide array of target domains, and fast to train. We test the proposed architecture on several well-known datasets, including M3, M4 and TOURISM competition datasets containing time series from diverse domains. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance for two configurations of N-BEATS for all the datasets, improving forecast accuracy by 11% over a statistical benchmark and by 3% over last year's winner of the M4 competition, a domain-adjusted hand-crafted hybrid between neural network and statistical time series models. The first configuration of our model does not employ any time-series-specific components and its performance on heterogeneous datasets strongly suggests that, contrarily to received wisdom, deep learning primitives such as residual blocks are by themselves sufficient to solve a wide range of forecasting problems. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed architecture can be augmented to provide outputs that are interpretable without considerable loss in accuracy.
Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learning
Vikas Verma
Alex Lamb
Juho Kannala
David Lopez-Paz
Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Accuracy
Alex Lamb
Vikas Verma
Juho Kannala
Adversarial robustness has become a central goal in deep learning, both in theory and practice. However, successful methods to improve adver… (see more)sarial robustness (such as adversarial training) greatly hurt generalization performance on the clean data. This could have a major impact on how adversarial robustness affects real world systems (i.e. many may opt to forego robustness if it can improve performance on the clean data). We propose Interpolated Adversarial Training, which employs recently proposed interpolation based training methods in the framework of adversarial training. On CIFAR-10, adversarial training increases clean test error from 5.8% to 16.7%, whereas with our Interpolated adversarial training we retain adversarial robustness while achieving a clean test error of only 6.5%. With our technique, the relative error increase for the robust model is reduced from 187.9% to just 12.1%.
Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Accuracy
Alex Lamb
Vikas Verma
Juho Kannala
Adversarial robustness has become a central goal in deep learning, both in theory and practice. However, successful methods to improve adver… (see more)sarial robustness (such as adversarial training) greatly hurt generalization performance on the clean data. This could have a major impact on how adversarial robustness affects real world systems (i.e. many may opt to forego robustness if it can improve performance on the clean data). We propose Interpolated Adversarial Training, which employs recently proposed interpolation based training methods in the framework of adversarial training. On CIFAR-10, adversarial training increases clean test error from 5.8% to 16.7%, whereas with our Interpolated adversarial training we retain adversarial robustness while achieving a clean test error of only 6.5%. With our technique, the relative error increase for the robust model is reduced from 187.9% to just 12.1%.
Predicting Tactical Solutions to Operational Planning Problems under Imperfect Information
Eric P. Larsen
Sébastien Lachapelle
This paper offers a methodological contribution at the intersection of machine learning and operations research. Namely, we propose a method… (see more)ology to quickly predict expected tactical descriptions of operational solutions (TDOSs). The problem we address occurs in the context of two-stage stochastic programming, where the second stage is demanding computationally. We aim to predict at a high speed the expected TDOS associated with the second-stage problem, conditionally on the first-stage variables. This may be used in support of the solution to the overall two-stage problem by avoiding the online generation of multiple second-stage scenarios and solutions. We formulate the tactical prediction problem as a stochastic optimal prediction program, whose solution we approximate with supervised machine learning. The training data set consists of a large number of deterministic operational problems generated by controlled probabilistic sampling. The labels are computed based on solutions to these problems (solved independently and offline), employing appropriate aggregation and subselection methods to address uncertainty. Results on our motivating application on load planning for rail transportation show that deep learning models produce accurate predictions in very short computing time (milliseconds or less). The predictive accuracy is close to the lower bounds calculated based on sample average approximation of the stochastic prediction programs.
Information Fusion in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation 1
Mohammad Havaei
Nicolas Guizard
Focused Hierarchical RNNs for Conditional Sequence Processing
Nan Rosemary Ke
Konrad Żołna
Zhouhan Lin
Adam Trischler
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with attention mechanisms have obtained state-of-the-art results for many sequence processing tasks. Most o… (see more)f these models use a simple form of encoder with attention that looks over the entire sequence and assigns a weight to each token independently. We present a mechanism for focusing RNN encoders for sequence modelling tasks which allows them to attend to key parts of the input as needed. We formulate this using a multi-layer conditional sequence encoder that reads in one token at a time and makes a discrete decision on whether the token is relevant to the context or question being asked. The discrete gating mechanism takes in the context embedding and the current hidden state as inputs and controls information flow into the layer above. We train it using policy gradient methods. We evaluate this method on several types of tasks with different attributes. First, we evaluate the method on synthetic tasks which allow us to evaluate the model for its generalization ability and probe the behavior of the gates in more controlled settings. We then evaluate this approach on large scale Question Answering tasks including the challenging MS MARCO and SearchQA tasks. Our models shows consistent improvements for both tasks over prior work and our baselines. It has also shown to generalize significantly better on synthetic tasks as compared to the baselines.