The Mila AI Policy Fellowship translates deep AI expertise into rigorous, public-interest policy. Read the newest publication Bridging the Expertise Gap: Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms for AI Regulation by Moritz von Knebel
This program supports AI startups at any time of the year. Benefit from cutting-edge resources and tailored support to accelerate your technology's development.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
With the rapid advancement and deployment of Agentic AI, our scientific understanding of capabilities and limitations has not kept pace, lea… (see more)ding to cases where AI agents cause harm. We argue that many of these safety limitations are not novel problems. Instead, the safety challenges currently facing AI agents can be seen as instances of problems the reinforcement learning (RL) community has studied rigorously for decades. The core of this argument concerns the problem formulation of AI agents. AI agents are designed to solve sequential decision-making problems: problems with long-term objectives in which actions have delayed consequences. To model these types of problem, the problem is set up the problem such that the agent receives observations, feedback on its progress, and then takes actions. This is precisely the formulation of the RL problem. In this paper, we formalize the problem equivalence, which we then leverage to argue that \textbf{AI Agent safety is a reinforcement learning problem: the failure modes currently observed in deployed AI agents are structural instances of problems RL has formalized for decades, and the RL safety literature provides principled tools to diagnose and address them.}. We conclude with a call for deliberate collaboration between the RL and AI agent research communities: AI agent researchers gain access to principled frameworks, while RL researchers gain a class of real-world problems that could expose fundamental gaps in current RL benchmarks and theory.
2026-05-22
AIWILD @ International Conference on Machine Learning (published)