Portrait of Yoshua Bengio

Yoshua Bengio

Core Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal, Department of Computer Science and Operations Research Department
Scientific Director, Leadership Team
Research Topics
Causality
Computational Neuroscience
Deep Learning
Generative Models
Graph Neural Networks
Machine Learning Theory
Medical Machine Learning
Molecular Modeling
Natural Language Processing
Probabilistic Models
Reasoning
Recurrent Neural Networks
Reinforcement Learning
Representation Learning

Biography

*For media requests, please write to medias@mila.quebec.

For more information please contact Marie-Josée Beauchamp, Administrative Assistant at marie-josee.beauchamp@mila.quebec.

Yoshua Bengio is recognized worldwide as a leading expert in AI. He is most known for his pioneering work in deep learning, which earned him the 2018 A.M. Turing Award, “the Nobel Prize of computing,” with Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun.

Bengio is a full professor at Université de Montréal, and the founder and scientific director of Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute. He is also a senior fellow at CIFAR and co-directs its Learning in Machines & Brains program, serves as scientific director of IVADO, and holds a Canada CIFAR AI Chair.

In 2019, Bengio was awarded the prestigious Killam Prize and in 2022, he was the most cited computer scientist in the world by h-index. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of London, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, Knight of the Legion of Honor of France and Officer of the Order of Canada. In 2023, he was appointed to the UN’s Scientific Advisory Board for Independent Advice on Breakthroughs in Science and Technology.

Concerned about the social impact of AI, Bengio helped draft the Montréal Declaration for the Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence and continues to raise awareness about the importance of mitigating the potentially catastrophic risks associated with future AI systems.

Current Students

Research Intern - McGill University
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université du Québec à Rimouski
Independent visiting researcher
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - UQAR
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - N/A
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - KAIST
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Barcelona University
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Research Intern
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Imperial College London
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Ying Wu Coll of Computing
PhD - University of Waterloo
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Max-Planck-Institute for Intelligent Systems
PhD - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni
Independent visiting researcher - Technical University of Munich
Postdoctorate - Polytechnique Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - RWTH Aachen University (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen)
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher
Collaborating researcher - KAIST
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :

Publications

Constant Memory Attentive Neural Processes
Leo Feng
Frederick Tung
Hossein Hajimirsadeghi
Mohamed Osama Ahmed
DynGFN: Bayesian Dynamic Causal Discovery using Generative Flow Networks
Lazar Atanackovic
Alexander Tong
Jason Hartford
Leo Jingyu Lee
Bo Wang
Learning the causal structure of observable variables is a central focus for scientific discovery. Bayesian causal discovery methods tackle… (see more) this problem by learning a posterior over the set of admissible graphs given our priors and observations. Existing methods primarily consider observations from static systems and assume the underlying causal structure takes the form of a directed acyclic graph (DAG). In settings with dynamic feedback mechanisms that regulate the trajectories of individual variables, this acyclicity assumption fails unless we account for time. We focus on learning Bayesian posteriors over cyclic graphs and treat causal discovery as a problem of sparse identification of a dynamical sys-tem. This imposes a natural temporal causal order between variables and captures cyclic feedback loops through time. Under this lens, we propose a new framework for Bayesian causal discovery for dynamical systems and present a novel generative flow network architecture (DynGFN) tailored for this task. Our results indicate that DynGFN learns posteriors that better encapsulate the distributions over admissible cyclic causal structures compared to counterpart state-of-the-art approaches.
GFlowNets for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery
Moksh J. Jain
Tristan Deleu
Jason Hartford
Cheng-Hao Liu
Alex Hernandez-Garcia
Tackling the most pressing problems for humanity, such as the climate crisis and the threat of global pandemics, requires accelerating the p… (see more)ace of scientific discovery. While science has traditionally relied...
GFlowOut: Dropout with Generative Flow Networks
Dianbo Liu
Moksh J. Jain
Bonaventure F. P. Dossou
Qianli Shen
Salem Lahlou
Anirudh Goyal
Nikolay Malkin
Chris Emezue
Dinghuai Zhang
Nadhir Hassen
Xu Ji
Kenji Kawaguchi
GFlowOut: Dropout with Generative Flow Networks
Dianbo Liu
Moksh J. Jain
Bonaventure F. P. Dossou
Qianli Shen
Salem Lahlou
Anirudh Goyal
Nikolay Malkin
Chris Emezue
Dinghuai Zhang
Nadhir Hassen
Xu Ji
Kenji Kawaguchi
HyenaDNA: Long-Range Genomic Sequence Modeling at Single Nucleotide Resolution
Eric Nguyen
Michael Poli
Marjan Faizi
Armin W Thomas
Callum Birch-Sykes
Michael Wornow
Aman Patel
Clayton M. Rabideau
Stefano Massaroli
Stefano Ermon
Stephen Baccus
Christopher Re
Learning GFlowNets from partial episodes for improved convergence and stability
Kanika Madan
Jarrid Rector-Brooks
Maksym Korablyov
Emmanuel Bengio
Moksh J. Jain
Andrei Cristian Nica
Tom Bosc
Nikolay Malkin
Generative flow networks (GFlowNets) are a family of algorithms for training a sequential sampler of discrete objects under an unnormalized … (see more)target density and have been successfully used for various probabilistic modeling tasks. Existing training objectives for GFlowNets are either local to states or transitions, or propagate a reward signal over an entire sampling trajectory. We argue that these alternatives represent opposite ends of a gradient bias-variance tradeoff and propose a way to exploit this tradeoff to mitigate its harmful effects. Inspired by the TD(
MixupE: Understanding and Improving Mixup from Directional Derivative Perspective
Vikas Verma
Yingtian Zou
Sarthak Mittal
Wai Hoh Tang
Hieu Pham
Juho Kannala
Arno Solin
Kenji Kawaguchi
Mixup is a popular data augmentation technique for training deep neural networks where additional samples are generated by linearly interpol… (see more)ating pairs of inputs and their labels. This technique is known to improve the generalization performance in many learning paradigms and applications. In this work, we first analyze Mixup and show that it implicitly regularizes infinitely many directional derivatives of all orders. Based on this new insight, we propose an improved version of Mixup, theoretically justified to deliver better generalization performance than the vanilla Mixup. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conduct experiments across various domains such as images, tabular data, speech, and graphs. Our results show that the proposed method improves Mixup across multiple datasets using a variety of architectures, for instance, exhibiting an improvement over Mixup by 0.8% in ImageNet top-1 accuracy.
MixupE: Understanding and improving Mixup from directional derivative perspective
Vikas Verma
Yingtian Zou
Sarthak Mittal
Wai Hoh Tang
Hieu Pham
Juho Kannala
Arno Solin
Kenji Kawaguchi
NEURAL NETWORK-BASED SOLVERS FOR PDES
M. Cameron
Ian G Goodfellow
(1) N (x; θ) = Ll+1 ○ σl ○Ll ○ σl−1 ○ . . . ○ σ1 ○L1. The symbol Lk denotes the k’s affine operator of the form Lk(x) = … (see more)Akx + bk, while σk denotes a nonlinear function called an activation function. The activation functions are chosen by the user. The matrices Ak and shift vectors (or bias vectors) bk are encoded into the argument θ: θ = {Ak, bk} l+1 k=1. The term training neural network means finding {Ak, bk} l+1 k=1 such that N (x; θ) satisfies certain conditions. These conditions are described by the loss function chosen by the user. For example, one might want the neural network to assume certain values fj at certain points xj , j = 1, . . . ,N . These points x are called the training data. In this case, a common choice of the loss function is the least squares error:
Stochastic Generative Flow Networks
Ling Pan
Dinghuai Zhang
Moksh J. Jain
Longbo Huang
Stochastic Generative Flow Networks
Ling Pan
Dinghuai Zhang
Moksh J. Jain
Longbo Huang
Generative Flow Networks (or GFlowNets for short) are a family of probabilistic agents that learn to sample complex combinatorial structures… (see more) through the lens of ``inference as control''. They have shown great potential in generating high-quality and diverse candidates from a given energy landscape. However, existing GFlowNets can be applied only to deterministic environments, and fail in more general tasks with stochastic dynamics, which can limit their applicability. To overcome this challenge, this paper introduces Stochastic GFlowNets, a new algorithm that extends GFlowNets to stochastic environments. By decomposing state transitions into two steps, Stochastic GFlowNets isolate environmental stochasticity and learn a dynamics model to capture it. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Stochastic GFlowNets offer significant advantages over standard GFlowNets as well as MCMC- and RL-based approaches, on a variety of standard benchmarks with stochastic dynamics.