Portrait of Yoshua Bengio

Yoshua Bengio

Core Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal, Department of Computer Science and Operations Research Department
Research Topics
Causality
Computational Neuroscience
Deep Learning
Generative Models
Graph Neural Networks
Machine Learning Theory
Medical Machine Learning
Molecular Modeling
Natural Language Processing
Probabilistic Models
Reasoning
Recurrent Neural Networks
Reinforcement Learning
Representation Learning

Biography

*For media requests, please write to medias@mila.quebec.

For more information please contact Cassidy MacNeil, Senior Assistant and Operation Lead at cassidy.macneil@mila.quebec.

Yoshua Bengio is recognized worldwide as a leading expert in AI. He is most known for his pioneering work in deep learning, which earned him the 2018 A.M. Turing Award, “the Nobel Prize of computing,” with Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun.

Bengio is a full professor at Université de Montréal, and the founder and scientific advisor of Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute. He is also a senior fellow at CIFAR and co-directs its Learning in Machines & Brains program, serves as special advisor and founding scientific director of IVADO, and holds a Canada CIFAR AI Chair.

In 2019, Bengio was awarded the prestigious Killam Prize and in 2022, he was the most cited computer scientist in the world by h-index. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of London, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, Knight of the Legion of Honor of France and Officer of the Order of Canada. In 2023, he was appointed to the UN’s Scientific Advisory Board for Independent Advice on Breakthroughs in Science and Technology.

Concerned about the social impact of AI, Bengio helped draft the Montréal Declaration for the Responsible Development of Artificial Intelligence and continues to raise awareness about the importance of mitigating the potentially catastrophic risks associated with future AI systems.

Current Students

Collaborating Alumni - McGill University
Collaborating researcher - Cambridge University
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - N/A
Principal supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
Research Intern - KOREA ADVANCED INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Collaborating researcher - s.o.
PhD - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Independent visiting researcher - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Ying Wu Coll of Computing
Collaborating researcher - University of Waterloo
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - University of Cambridge
Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Co-supervisor :
PhD - Université de Montréal
Principal supervisor :
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
Collaborating researcher - Université de Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :

Publications

Recurrent Independent Mechanisms
Learning modular structures which reflect the dynamics of the environment can lead to better generalization and robustness to changes which … (see more)only affect a few of the underlying causes. We propose Recurrent Independent Mechanisms (RIMs), a new recurrent architecture in which multiple groups of recurrent cells operate with nearly independent transition dynamics, communicate only sparingly through the bottleneck of attention, and are only updated at time steps where they are most relevant. We show that this leads to specialization amongst the RIMs, which in turn allows for dramatically improved generalization on tasks where some factors of variation differ systematically between training and evaluation.
RNNLogic: Learning Logic Rules for Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs
Louis-Pascal Xhonneux
This paper studies learning logic rules for reasoning on knowledge graphs. Logic rules provide interpretable explanations when used for pred… (see more)iction as well as being able to generalize to other tasks, and hence are critical to learn. Existing methods either suffer from the problem of searching in a large search space (e.g., neural logic programming) or ineffective optimization due to sparse rewards (e.g., techniques based on reinforcement learning). To address these limitations, this paper proposes a probabilistic model called RNNLogic. RNNLogic treats logic rules as a latent variable, and simultaneously trains a rule generator as well as a reasoning predictor with logic rules. We develop an EM-based algorithm for optimization. In each iteration, the reasoning predictor is first updated to explore some generated logic rules for reasoning. Then in the E-step, we select a set of high-quality rules from all generated rules with both the rule generator and reasoning predictor via posterior inference; and in the M-step, the rule generator is updated with the rules selected in the E-step. Experiments on four datasets prove the effectiveness of RNNLogic.
Saliency Is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization
Joseph D. Viviano
Becks Simpson
Poor generalization is one symptom of models that learn to predict target variables using spuriously-correlated image features present only … (see more)in the training distribution instead of the true image features that denote a class. It is often thought that this can be diagnosed visually using attribution (aka saliency) maps. We study if this assumption is correct. In some prediction tasks, such as for medical images, one may have some images with masks drawn by a human expert, indicating a region of the image containing relevant information to make the prediction. We study multiple methods that take advantage of such auxiliary labels, by training networks to ignore distracting features which may be found outside of the region of interest. This mask information is only used during training and has an impact on generalization accuracy depending on the severity of the shift between the training and test distributions. Surprisingly, while these methods improve generalization performance in the presence of a covariate shift, there is no strong correspondence between the correction of attribution towards the features a human expert has labelled as important and generalization performance. These results suggest that the root cause of poor generalization may not always be spatially defined, and raise questions about the utility of masks as "attribution priors" as well as saliency maps for explainable predictions.
Saliency Is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization
Joseph D. Viviano
Becks Simpson
Poor generalization is one symptom of models that learn to predict target variables using spuriously-correlated image features present only … (see more)in the training distribution instead of the true image features that denote a class. It is often thought that this can be diagnosed visually using attribution (aka saliency) maps. We study if this assumption is correct. In some prediction tasks, such as for medical images, one may have some images with masks drawn by a human expert, indicating a region of the image containing relevant information to make the prediction. We study multiple methods that take advantage of such auxiliary labels, by training networks to ignore distracting features which may be found outside of the region of interest. This mask information is only used during training and has an impact on generalization accuracy depending on the severity of the shift between the training and test distributions. Surprisingly, while these methods improve generalization performance in the presence of a covariate shift, there is no strong correspondence between the correction of attribution towards the features a human expert has labelled as important and generalization performance. These results suggest that the root cause of poor generalization may not always be spatially defined, and raise questions about the utility of masks as "attribution priors" as well as saliency maps for explainable predictions.
Spatially Structured Recurrent Modules
Nasim Rahaman
Muhammad Waleed Gondal
Manuel Wuthrich
Yash Sharma
Bernhard Schölkopf
Capturing the structure of a data-generating process by means of appropriate inductive biases can help in learning models that generalise we… (see more)ll and are robust to changes in the input distribution. While methods that harness spatial and temporal structures find broad application, recent work has demonstrated the potential of models that leverage sparse and modular structure using an ensemble of sparingly interacting modules. In this work, we take a step towards dynamic models that are capable of simultaneously exploiting both modular and spatiotemporal structures. To this end, we model the dynamical system as a collection of autonomous but sparsely interacting sub-systems that interact according to a learned topology which is informed by the spatial structure of the underlying system. This gives rise to a class of models that are well suited for capturing the dynamics of systems that only offer local views into their state, along with corresponding spatial locations of those views. On the tasks of video prediction from cropped frames and multi-agent world modelling from partial observations in the challenging Starcraft2 domain, we find our models to be more robust to the number of available views and better capable of generalisation to novel tasks without additional training than strong baselines that perform equally well or better on the training distribution.
Systematic Generalisation with Group Invariant Predictions
Toward Causal Representation Learning
Bernhard Schölkopf
Francesco Locatello
Nan Rosemary Ke
Nal Kalchbrenner
The two fields of machine learning and graphical causality arose and are developed separately. However, there is, now, cross-pollination and… (see more) increasing interest in both fields to benefit from the advances of the other. In this article, we review fundamental concepts of causal inference and relate them to crucial open problems of machine learning, including transfer and generalization, thereby assaying how causality can contribute to modern machine learning research. This also applies in the opposite direction: we note that most work in causality starts from the premise that the causal variables are given. A central problem for AI and causality is, thus, causal representation learning, that is, the discovery of high-level causal variables from low-level observations. Finally, we delineate some implications of causality for machine learning and propose key research areas at the intersection of both communities.
hBERT + BiasCorp - Fighting Racism on the Web
Olawale Moses Onabola
Zhuang Ma
Xie Yang
Benjamin Akera
Jia Xue
Dianbo Liu
Subtle and overt racism is still present both in physical and online communities today and has impacted many lives in different segments of … (see more)the society. In this short piece of work, we present how we’re tackling this societal issue with Natural Language Processing. We are releasing BiasCorp, a dataset containing 139,090 comments and news segment from three specific sources - Fox News, BreitbartNews and YouTube. The first batch (45,000 manually annotated) is ready for publication. We are currently in the final phase of manually labeling the remaining dataset using Amazon Mechanical Turk. BERT has been used widely in several downstream tasks. In this work, we present hBERT, where we modify certain layers of the pretrained BERT model with the new Hopfield Layer. hBert generalizes well across different distributions with the added advantage of a reduced model complexity. We are also releasing a JavaScript library 3 and a Chrome Extension Application, to help developers make use of our trained model in web applications (say chat application) and for users to identify and report racially biased contents on the web respectively
An Analysis of the Adaptation Speed of Causal Models
Consider a collection of datasets generated by unknown interventions on an unknown structural causal model …
Neural Function Modules with Sparse Arguments: A Dynamic Approach to Integrating Information across Layers
Agnieszka Słowik
Michael Mozer
Philippe Beaudoin
Feed-forward neural networks consist of a sequence of layers, in which each layer performs some processing on the information from the previ… (see more)ous layer. A downside to this approach is that each layer (or module, as multiple modules can operate in parallel) is tasked with processing the entire hidden state, rather than a particular part of the state which is most relevant for that module. Methods which only operate on a small number of input variables are an essential part of most programming languages, and they allow for improved modularity and code re-usability. Our proposed method, Neural Function Modules (NFM), aims to introduce the same structural capability into deep learning. Most of the work in the context of feed-forward networks combining top-down and bottom-up feedback is limited to classification problems. The key contribution of our work is to combine attention, sparsity, top-down and bottom-up feedback, in a flexible algorithm which, as we show, improves the results in standard classification, out-of-domain generalization, generative modeling, and learning representations in the context of reinforcement learning.
Transformers with Competitive Ensembles of Independent Mechanisms
Di He
Guolin Ke
Chien-Feng Liao
An important development in deep learning from the earliest MLPs has been a move towards architectures with structural inductive biases whic… (see more)h enable the model to keep distinct sources of information and routes of processing well-separated. This structure is linked to the notion of independent mechanisms from the causality literature, in which a mechanism is able to retain the same processing as irrelevant aspects of the world are changed. For example, convnets enable separation over positions, while attention-based architectures (especially Transformers) learn which combination of positions to process dynamically. In this work we explore a way in which the Transformer architecture is deficient: it represents each position with a large monolithic hidden representation and a single set of parameters which are applied over the entire hidden representation. This potentially throws unrelated sources of information together, and limits the Transformer's ability to capture independent mechanisms. To address this, we propose Transformers with Independent Mechanisms (TIM), a new Transformer layer which divides the hidden representation and parameters into multiple mechanisms, which only exchange information through attention. Additionally, we propose a competition mechanism which encourages these mechanisms to specialize over time steps, and thus be more independent. We study TIM on a large-scale BERT model, on the Image Transformer, and on speech enhancement and find evidence for semantically meaningful specialization as well as improved performance.
Towards Causal Representation Learning
Bernhard Schölkopf
Francesco Locatello
Nan Rosemary Ke
Nal Kalchbrenner
The two fields of machine learning and graphical causality arose and developed separately. However, there is now cross-pollination and incre… (see more)asing interest in both fields to benefit from the advances of the other. In the present paper, we review fundamental concepts of causal inference and relate them to crucial open problems of machine learning, including transfer and generalization, thereby assaying how causality can contribute to modern machine learning research. This also applies in the opposite direction: we note that most work in causality starts from the premise that the causal variables are given. A central problem for AI and causality is, thus, causal representation learning, the discovery of high-level causal variables from low-level observations. Finally, we delineate some implications of causality for machine learning and propose key research areas at the intersection of both communities.