Portrait de Alexandre Drouin

Alexandre Drouin

Membre industriel associé
Professeur adjoint, Université Laval, Département de génie électrique et de génie informatique
Chercheur scientifique, ServiceNow
Sujets de recherche
Agent basé sur un LLM
Apprentissage profond
Biologie computationnelle
Causalité
Prévision des séries temporelles
Site web
Google Scholar
LinkedIn
X

Biographie

Alexandre Drouin est chercheur en intelligence artificielle chez ServiceNow Research à Montréal et professeur associé au Département d’informatique et de génie logiciel de l’Université Laval. Il dirige une équipe de recherche qui explore l’utilisation de l’apprentissage automatique pour la prise de décision dans des environnements dynamiques complexes. Son intérêt de recherche principal est la prise de décision causale, dont le but est de répondre à des questions interventionnelles et contrefactuelles en tenant compte des sources d’incertitude potentielles, par exemple l’ambiguïté des relations causales sous-jacentes à un système et l’effet de variables latentes. Il s’intéresse aussi aux modèles de prédiction probabiliste pour les séries temporelles et à leur utilisation pour prédire l’effet à long terme d’actions.

Il est détenteur d’un doctorat en informatique de l’Université Laval, qu’il a reçu pour son travail sur le développement d’algorithmes d’apprentissage automatique pour la découverte de biomarqueurs en génomique et leur application au problème de résistance aux antibiotiques.

Étudiants actuels

Arjun Ashok
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Irina Rish
Site web
Github
Google Scholar
Léo Boisvert
Doctorat - Polytechnique
Co-superviseur⋅e :
Quentin Cappart
Philippe Brouillard
Doctorat - UdeM
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Dhanya Sridhar
Site web
Github
Google Scholar

Publications

G RADIENT -B ASED N EURAL DAG L EARNING WITH I NTERVENTIONS
Philippe Brouillard
Alexandre Drouin
Sébastien Lachapelle
Alexandre Lacoste
Simon Lacoste-Julien
Decision making based on statistical association alone can be a dangerous endeavor due to non-causal associations. Ideally, one would rely o… (voir plus)n causal relationships that enable reasoning about the effect of interventions. Several methods have been proposed to discover such relationships from observational and inter-ventional data. Among them, GraN-DAG, a method that relies on the constrained optimization of neural networks, was shown to produce state-of-the-art results among algorithms relying purely on observational data. However, it is limited to observational data and cannot make use of interventions. In this work, we extend GraN-DAG to support interventional data and show that this improves its ability to infer causal structures
2019-12-31
(publié)
www.semanticscholar.org
In Search of Robust Measures of Generalization
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Alexandre Drouin
Brady Neal
Nitarshan Rajkumar
Ethan Caballero
Linbo Wang
Ioannis Mitliagkas
Daniel M. Roy
One of the principal scientific challenges in deep learning is explaining generalization, i.e., why the particular way the community now tra… (voir plus)ins networks to achieve small training error also leads to small error on held-out data from the same population. It is widely appreciated that some worst-case theories -- such as those based on the VC dimension of the class of predictors induced by modern neural network architectures -- are unable to explain empirical performance. A large volume of work aims to close this gap, primarily by developing bounds on generalization error, optimization error, and excess risk. When evaluated empirically, however, most of these bounds are numerically vacuous. Focusing on generalization bounds, this work addresses the question of how to evaluate such bounds empirically. Jiang et al. (2020) recently described a large-scale empirical study aimed at uncovering potential causal relationships between bounds/measures and generalization. Building on their study, we highlight where their proposed methods can obscure failures and successes of generalization measures in explaining generalization. We argue that generalization measures should instead be evaluated within the framework of distributional robustness.
2019-12-31
NeurIPS (publié)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Synbols: Probing Learning Algorithms with Synthetic Datasets
Alexandre Lacoste
Pau Rodríguez
Frédéric Branchaud-Charron
Parmida Atighehchian
Massimo Caccia
Issam Laradji
Alexandre Drouin
Matt Craddock
Laurent Charlin
David Vázquez
Progress in the field of machine learning has been fueled by the introduction of benchmark datasets pushing the limits of existing algorithm… (voir plus)s. Enabling the design of datasets to test specific properties and failure modes of learning algorithms is thus a problem of high interest, as it has a direct impact on innovation in the field. In this sense, we introduce Synbols -- Synthetic Symbols -- a tool for rapidly generating new datasets with a rich composition of latent features rendered in low resolution images. Synbols leverages the large amount of symbols available in the Unicode standard and the wide range of artistic font provided by the open font community. Our tool's high-level interface provides a language for rapidly generating new distributions on the latent features, including various types of textures and occlusions. To showcase the versatility of Synbols, we use it to dissect the limitations and flaws in standard learning algorithms in various learning setups including supervised learning, active learning, out of distribution generalization, unsupervised representation learning, and object counting.
2019-12-31
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020) (publié)
doi.org
arxiv.org