Trained Without My Consent: Detecting Code Inclusion In Language Models Trained on Code
Vahid Majdinasab
Amin Nikanjam
Foutse Khomh
Code auditing ensures that the developed code adheres to standards, regulations, and copyright protection by verifying that it does not cont… (voir plus)ain code from protected sources. The recent advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) as coding assistants in the software development process poses new challenges for code auditing. The dataset for training these models is mainly collected from publicly available sources. This raises the issue of intellectual property infringement as developers’ codes are already included in the dataset. Therefore, auditing code developed using LLMs is challenging, as it is difficult to reliably assert if an LLM used during development has been trained on specific copyrighted codes, given that we do not have access to the training datasets of these models. Given the non-disclosure of the training datasets, traditional approaches such as code clone detection are insufficient for asserting copyright infringement. To address this challenge, we propose a new approach, TraWiC; a model-agnostic and interpretable method based on membership inference for detecting code inclusion in an LLM’s training dataset. We extract syntactic and semantic identifiers unique to each program to train a classifier for detecting code inclusion. In our experiments, we observe that TraWiC is capable of detecting 83.87% of codes that were used to train an LLM. In comparison, the prevalent clone detection tool NiCad is only capable of detecting 47.64%. In addition to its remarkable performance, TraWiC has low resource overhead in contrast to pair-wise clone detection that is conducted during the auditing process of tools like CodeWhisperer reference tracker, across thousands of code snippets.
2024-02-14
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
ChatGPT vs LLaMA: Impact, Reliability, and Challenges in Stack Overflow Discussions
Leuson Da Silva
Jordan Samhi
Foutse Khomh
Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has shaken up Stack Overflow, the premier platform for developers' queries on programming and so… (voir plus)ftware development. Demonstrating an ability to generate instant, human-like responses to technical questions, ChatGPT has ignited debates within the developer community about the evolving role of human-driven platforms in the age of generative AI. Two months after ChatGPT's release, Meta released its answer with its own Large Language Model (LLM) called LLaMA: the race was on. We conducted an empirical study analyzing questions from Stack Overflow and using these LLMs to address them. This way, we aim to (ii) measure user engagement evolution with Stack Overflow over time; (ii) quantify the reliability of LLMs' answers and their potential to replace Stack Overflow in the long term; (iii) identify and understand why LLMs fails; and (iv) compare LLMs together. Our empirical results are unequivocal: ChatGPT and LLaMA challenge human expertise, yet do not outperform it for some domains, while a significant decline in user posting activity has been observed. Furthermore, we also discuss the impact of our findings regarding the usage and development of new LLMs.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Girish Sastry
Lennart Heim
Haydn Belfield
Markus Anderljung
Miles Brundage
Julian Hazell
Cullen C. O'keefe
Gillian K. Hadfield
Richard Ngo
Konstantin Pilz
George Gor
Emma Bluemke
Sarah Shoker
Janet Egan
Robert F. Trager
Shahar Avin
Adrian Weller
Yoshua Bengio
Diane Coyle
Computing power, or"compute,"is crucial for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. As a result, govern… (voir plus)ments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. For example, governments are investing in domestic compute capacity, controlling the flow of compute to competing countries, and subsidizing compute access to certain sectors. However, these efforts only scratch the surface of how compute can be used to govern AI development and deployment. Relative to other key inputs to AI (data and algorithms), AI-relevant compute is a particularly effective point of intervention: it is detectable, excludable, and quantifiable, and is produced via an extremely concentrated supply chain. These characteristics, alongside the singular importance of compute for cutting-edge AI models, suggest that governing compute can contribute to achieving common policy objectives, such as ensuring the safety and beneficial use of AI. More precisely, policymakers could use compute to facilitate regulatory visibility of AI, allocate resources to promote beneficial outcomes, and enforce restrictions against irresponsible or malicious AI development and usage. However, while compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. Some ideas are currently being piloted, while others are hindered by the need for fundamental research. Furthermore, naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power. We end by suggesting guardrails to minimize these risks from compute governance.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
arxiv.org
arxiv.org
Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Girish Sastry
Lennart Heim
Haydn Belfield
Markus Anderljung
Miles Brundage
Julian Hazell
Cullen C. O'keefe
Gillian K. Hadfield
Richard Ngo
Konstantin Pilz
George Gor
Emma Bluemke
Sarah Shoker
Janet Egan
Robert F. Trager
Shahar Avin
Adrian Weller
Yoshua Bengio
Diane Coyle
Computing power, or"compute,"is crucial for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. As a result, govern… (voir plus)ments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. For example, governments are investing in domestic compute capacity, controlling the flow of compute to competing countries, and subsidizing compute access to certain sectors. However, these efforts only scratch the surface of how compute can be used to govern AI development and deployment. Relative to other key inputs to AI (data and algorithms), AI-relevant compute is a particularly effective point of intervention: it is detectable, excludable, and quantifiable, and is produced via an extremely concentrated supply chain. These characteristics, alongside the singular importance of compute for cutting-edge AI models, suggest that governing compute can contribute to achieving common policy objectives, such as ensuring the safety and beneficial use of AI. More precisely, policymakers could use compute to facilitate regulatory visibility of AI, allocate resources to promote beneficial outcomes, and enforce restrictions against irresponsible or malicious AI development and usage. However, while compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. Some ideas are currently being piloted, while others are hindered by the need for fundamental research. Furthermore, naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power. We end by suggesting guardrails to minimize these risks from compute governance.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Girish Sastry
Lennart Heim
Haydn Belfield
Markus Anderljung
Miles Brundage
Julian Hazell
Cullen C. O'keefe
Gillian K. Hadfield
Richard Ngo
Konstantin Pilz
George Gor
Emma Bluemke
Sarah Shoker
Janet Egan
Robert F. Trager
Shahar Avin
Adrian Weller
Yoshua Bengio
Diane Coyle
Computing power, or"compute,"is crucial for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. As a result, govern… (voir plus)ments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. For example, governments are investing in domestic compute capacity, controlling the flow of compute to competing countries, and subsidizing compute access to certain sectors. However, these efforts only scratch the surface of how compute can be used to govern AI development and deployment. Relative to other key inputs to AI (data and algorithms), AI-relevant compute is a particularly effective point of intervention: it is detectable, excludable, and quantifiable, and is produced via an extremely concentrated supply chain. These characteristics, alongside the singular importance of compute for cutting-edge AI models, suggest that governing compute can contribute to achieving common policy objectives, such as ensuring the safety and beneficial use of AI. More precisely, policymakers could use compute to facilitate regulatory visibility of AI, allocate resources to promote beneficial outcomes, and enforce restrictions against irresponsible or malicious AI development and usage. However, while compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. Some ideas are currently being piloted, while others are hindered by the need for fundamental research. Furthermore, naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power. We end by suggesting guardrails to minimize these risks from compute governance.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RL
Johan Samir Obando Ceron
Ghada Sokar
Timon Willi
Clare Lyle
Jesse Farebrother
Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Doina Precup
Pablo Samuel Castro
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RL
Johan Samir Obando Ceron
Ghada Sokar
Timon Willi
Clare Lyle
Jesse Farebrother
Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Doina Precup
Pablo Samuel Castro
The recent rapid progress in (self) supervised learning models is in large part predicted by empirical scaling laws: a model's performance s… (voir plus)cales proportionally to its size. Analogous scaling laws remain elusive for reinforcement learning domains, however, where increasing the parameter count of a model often hurts its final performance. In this paper, we demonstrate that incorporating Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) modules, and in particular Soft MoEs (Puigcerver et al., 2023), into value-based networks results in more parameter-scalable models, evidenced by substantial performance increases across a variety of training regimes and model sizes. This work thus provides strong empirical evidence towards developing scaling laws for reinforcement learning.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RL
Johan Samir Obando Ceron
Ghada Sokar
Timon Willi
Clare Lyle
Jesse Farebrother
Jakob Nicolaus Foerster
Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
Doina Precup
Pablo Samuel Castro
The recent rapid progress in (self) supervised learning models is in large part predicted by empirical scaling laws: a model's performance s… (voir plus)cales proportionally to its size. Analogous scaling laws remain elusive for reinforcement learning domains, however, where increasing the parameter count of a model often hurts its final performance. In this paper, we demonstrate that incorporating Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) modules, and in particular Soft MoEs (Puigcerver et al., 2023), into value-based networks results in more parameter-scalable models, evidenced by substantial performance increases across a variety of training regimes and model sizes. This work thus provides strong empirical evidence towards developing scaling laws for reinforcement learning.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Model approximation in MDPs with unbounded per-step cost
Berk Bozkurt
Aditya Mahajan
Ashutosh Nayyar
Yi Ouyang
We consider the problem of designing a control policy for an infinite-horizon discounted cost Markov decision process …
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Regional Adaptive Metropolis Light Transport
Hisanari Otsu
Killian Herveau
Johannes Hanika
Derek Nowrouzezahrai
Carsten Dachsbacher
The design of the proposal distributions, and most notably the kernel parameters, are crucial for the performance of Markov chain Monte Carl… (voir plus)o (MCMC) rendering. A poor selection of parameters can increase the correlation of the Markov chain and result in bad rendering performance. We approach this problem by a novel path perturbation strategy for online-learning of state-dependent kernel parameters. We base our approach on the theoretical framework of regional adaptive MCMC which enables the adaptation of parameters depending on the region of the state space which contains the current sample, and on information collected from previous samples. For this, we define a partitioning of the path space on a low-dimensional canonical space to capture the characteristics of paths, with a focus on path segments closer to the sensor. Fast convergence is achieved by adaptive refinement of the partitions. Exemplarily, we present two novel regional adaptive path perturbation techniques akin to lens and multi-chain perturbations. Our approach can easily be used on top of existing path space MLT methods to improve rendering efficiency, while being agnostic to the initial choice of kernel parameters.
2024-02-13
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Antagonistic AI
Alice Cai
Ian Arawjo
Elena L. Glassman
2024-02-12
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Antagonistic AI
Alice Cai
Ian Arawjo
Elena L. Glassman
2024-02-12
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org