Adriana Romero Soriano

2025-02-19

ArXiv (prépublication)

Boosting Latent Diffusion with Perceptual Objectives

Tariq Berrada

Pietro Astolfi

Jakob Verbeek

Melissa Hall

Marton Havasi

Michal Drozdzal

Yohann Benchetrit

Karteek Alahari

2025-01-22

ICLR.cc/2025/Conference (poster)

openreview.net

PairBench: A Systematic Framework for Selecting Reliable Judge VLMs

Aarash Feizi

Sai Rajeswar

Reihaneh Rabbany

Spandana Gella

Valentina Zantedeschi

Joao Monteiro

As large vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators, understanding their ability to effectively compare dat… (voir plus)a pairs as instructed in the prompt becomes essential. To address this, we present PairBench, a low-cost framework that systematically evaluates VLMs as customizable similarity tools across various modalities and scenarios. Through PairBench, we introduce four metrics that represent key desiderata of similarity scores: alignment with human annotations, consistency for data pairs irrespective of their order, smoothness of similarity distributions, and controllability through prompting. Our analysis demonstrates that no model, whether closed- or open-source, is superior on all metrics; the optimal choice depends on an auto evaluator's desired behavior (e.g., a smooth vs. a sharp judge), highlighting risks of widespread adoption of VLMs as evaluators without thorough assessment. For instance, the majority of VLMs struggle with maintaining symmetric similarity scores regardless of order. Additionally, our results show that the performance of VLMs on the metrics in PairBench closely correlates with popular benchmarks, showcasing its predictive power in ranking models.

2025-01-01

arXiv.org (prépublication)

What makes a good metric? Evaluating automatic metrics for text-to-image consistency

Candace Ross

Melissa Hall

Adina Williams

Language models are increasingly being incorporated as components in larger AI systems for various purposes, from prompt optimization to aut… (voir plus)omatic evaluation. In this work, we analyze the construct validity of four recent, commonly used methods for measuring text-to-image consistency - CLIPScore, TIFA, VPEval, and DSG - which rely on language models and/or VQA models as components. We define construct validity for text-image consistency metrics as a set of desiderata that text-image consistency metrics should have, and find that no tested metric satisfies all of them. We find that metrics lack sufficient sensitivity to language and visual properties. Next, we find that TIFA, VPEval and DSG contribute novel information above and beyond CLIPScore, but also that they correlate highly with each other. We also ablate different aspects of the text-image consistency metrics and find that not all model components are strictly necessary, also a symptom of insufficient sensitivity to visual information. Finally, we show that all three VQA-based metrics likely rely on familiar text shortcuts (such as yes-bias in QA) that call their aptitude as quantitative evaluations of model performance into question.

2024-12-18

ArXiv (prépublication)

What makes a good metric? Evaluating automatic metrics for text-to-image consistency

Candace Ross

Melissa Hall

Adina Williams

Language models are increasingly being incorporated as components in larger AI systems for various purposes, from prompt optimization to aut… (voir plus)omatic evaluation. In this work, we analyze the construct validity of four recent, commonly used methods for measuring text-to-image consistency - CLIPScore, TIFA, VPEval, and DSG - which rely on language models and/or VQA models as components. We define construct validity for text-image consistency metrics as a set of desiderata that text-image consistency metrics should have, and find that no tested metric satisfies all of them. We find that metrics lack sufficient sensitivity to language and visual properties. Next, we find that TIFA, VPEval and DSG contribute novel information above and beyond CLIPScore, but also that they correlate highly with each other. We also ablate different aspects of the text-image consistency metrics and find that not all model components are strictly necessary, also a symptom of insufficient sensitivity to visual information. Finally, we show that all three VQA-based metrics likely rely on familiar text shortcuts (such as yes-bias in QA) that call their aptitude as quantitative evaluations of model performance into question.

2024-12-18

ArXiv (prépublication)

EvalGIM: A Library for Evaluating Generative Image Models

Melissa Hall

Reyhane Askari

Mark Ibrahim

Candace Ross

Pietro Astolfi

Tariq Berrada

Marton Havasi

Yohann Benchetrit

Karen Ullrich

Carolina Braga

Abhishek Charnalia

Maeve Ryan

Michal Drozdzal

Jakob Verbeek

As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. Ho… (voir plus)wever, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced ''EvalGym''), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce ''Evaluation Exercises'' that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.

2024-12-13

ArXiv (prépublication)

EvalGIM: A Library for Evaluating Generative Image Models

Melissa Hall

Reyhane Askari

Mark Ibrahim

Candace Ross

Pietro Astolfi

Tariq Berrada

Marton Havasi

Yohann Benchetrit

Karen Ullrich

Carolina Braga

Abhishek Charnalia

Maeve Ryan

Michal Drozdzal

Jakob Verbeek

As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. Ho… (voir plus)wever, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced ''EvalGym''), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce ''Evaluation Exercises'' that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.

2024-12-13

ArXiv (prépublication)

EvalGIM: A Library for Evaluating Generative Image Models

Melissa Hall

Reyhane Askari Hemmat

Mark Ibrahim

Candace Ross

Pietro Astolfi

Tariq Berrada

Marton Havasi

Yohann Benchetrit

Karen Ullrich

Carolina Braga

Abhishek Charnalia

Maeve Ryan

Michal Drozdzal

Jakob Verbeek

As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. Ho… (voir plus)wever, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced ''EvalGym''), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce ''Evaluation Exercises'' that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.

2024-12-13

ArXiv (prépublication)

EvalGIM: A Library for Evaluating Generative Image Models

Melissa Hall

Reyhane Askari

Mark Ibrahim

Candace Ross

Pietro Astolfi

Tariq Berrada

Marton Havasi

Yohann Benchetrit

Karen Ullrich

Carolina Braga

Abhishek Charnalia

Maeve Ryan

Michal Drozdzal

Jakob Verbeek

As the use of text-to-image generative models increases, so does the adoption of automatic benchmarking methods used in their evaluation. Ho… (voir plus)wever, while metrics and datasets abound, there are few unified benchmarking libraries that provide a framework for performing evaluations across many datasets and metrics. Furthermore, the rapid introduction of increasingly robust benchmarking methods requires that evaluation libraries remain flexible to new datasets and metrics. Finally, there remains a gap in synthesizing evaluations in order to deliver actionable takeaways about model performance. To enable unified, flexible, and actionable evaluations, we introduce EvalGIM (pronounced ''EvalGym''), a library for evaluating generative image models. EvalGIM contains broad support for datasets and metrics used to measure quality, diversity, and consistency of text-to-image generative models. In addition, EvalGIM is designed with flexibility for user customization as a top priority and contains a structure that allows plug-and-play additions of new datasets and metrics. To enable actionable evaluation insights, we introduce ''Evaluation Exercises'' that highlight takeaways for specific evaluation questions. The Evaluation Exercises contain easy-to-use and reproducible implementations of two state-of-the-art evaluation methods of text-to-image generative models: consistency-diversity-realism Pareto Fronts and disaggregated measurements of performance disparities across groups. EvalGIM also contains Evaluation Exercises that introduce two new analysis methods for text-to-image generative models: robustness analyses of model rankings and balanced evaluations across different prompt styles. We encourage text-to-image model exploration with EvalGIM and invite contributions at https://github.com/facebookresearch/EvalGIM/.

2024-12-13

ArXiv (prépublication)

Improving Text-to-Image Consistency via Automatic Prompt Optimization

Pietro Astolfi

Melissa Hall

Candace Ross

Jack Urbanek

Adina Williams

Aishwarya Agrawal

Michal Drozdzal

2024-12-03

TMLR (accepté)

openreview.net

Improving Geo-diversity of Generated Images with Contextualized Vendi Score Guidance

Reyhane Askari Hemmat

Melissa Hall

Alicia Sun

Candace Ross

Michal Drozdzal

2024-11-21

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (publié)

Boosting Latent Diffusion with Perceptual Objectives

Tariq Berrada

Pietro Astolfi

Jakob Verbeek

Melissa Hall

Marton Havasi

Michal Drozdzal

Yohann Benchetrit

Karteek Alahari

Latent diffusion models (LDMs) power state-of-the-art high-resolution generative image models. LDMs learn the data distribution in the laten… (voir plus)t space of an autoencoder (AE) and produce images by mapping the generated latents into RGB image space using the AE decoder. While this approach allows for efficient model training and sampling, it induces a disconnect between the training of the diffusion model and the decoder, resulting in a loss of detail in the generated images. To remediate this disconnect, we propose to leverage the internal features of the decoder to define a latent perceptual loss (LPL). This loss encourages the models to create sharper and more realistic images. Our loss can be seamlessly integrated with common autoencoders used in latent diffusion models, and can be applied to different generative modeling paradigms such as DDPM with epsilon and velocity prediction, as well as flow matching. Extensive experiments with models trained on three datasets at 256 and 512 resolution show improved quantitative -- with boosts between 6% and 20% in FID -- and qualitative results when using our perceptual loss.

2024-11-06

ArXiv (prépublication)