Towards Understanding the Impact of Data Bugs on Deep Learning Models in Software Engineering
Mehil B. Shah
Mohammad Masudur Rahman
Foutse Khomh
Deep learning (DL) techniques have achieved significant success in various software engineering tasks (e.g., code completion by Copilot). Ho… (voir plus)wever, DL systems are prone to bugs from many sources, including training data. Existing literature suggests that bugs in training data are highly prevalent, but little research has focused on understanding their impacts on the models used in software engineering tasks. In this paper, we address this research gap through a comprehensive empirical investigation focused on three types of data prevalent in software engineering tasks: code-based, text-based, and metric-based. Using state-of-the-art baselines, we compare the models trained on clean datasets with those trained on datasets with quality issues and without proper preprocessing. By analysing the gradients, weights, and biases from neural networks under training, we identify the symptoms of data quality and preprocessing issues. Our analysis reveals that quality issues in code data cause biased learning and gradient instability, whereas problems in text data lead to overfitting and poor generalisation of models. On the other hand, quality issues in metric data result in exploding gradients and model overfitting, and inadequate preprocessing exacerbates these effects across all three data types. Finally, we demonstrate the validity and generalizability of our findings using six new datasets. Our research provides a better understanding of the impact and symptoms of data bugs in software engineering datasets. Practitioners and researchers can leverage these findings to develop better monitoring systems and data-cleaning methods to help detect and resolve data bugs in deep learning systems.
2024-11-19
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Different Horses for Different Courses: Comparing Bias Mitigation Algorithms in ML
Prakhar Ganeesh
Usman Gohar
Lu Cheng
Golnoosh Farnadi
With fairness concerns gaining significant attention in Machine Learning (ML), several bias mitigation techniques have been proposed, often … (voir plus)compared against each other to find the best method. These benchmarking efforts tend to use a common setup for evaluation under the assumption that providing a uniform environment ensures a fair comparison. However, bias mitigation techniques are sensitive to hyperparameter choices, random seeds, feature selection, etc., meaning that comparison on just one setting can unfairly favour certain algorithms. In this work, we show significant variance in fairness achieved by several algorithms and the influence of the learning pipeline on fairness scores. We highlight that most bias mitigation techniques can achieve comparable performance, given the freedom to perform hyperparameter optimization, suggesting that the choice of the evaluation parameters-rather than the mitigation technique itself-can sometimes create the perceived superiority of one method over another. We hope our work encourages future research on how various choices in the lifecycle of developing an algorithm impact fairness, and trends that guide the selection of appropriate algorithms.
2024-11-17
ArXiv (prépublication)
arxiv.org
arxiv.org
Different Horses for Different Courses: Comparing Bias Mitigation Algorithms in ML
Prakhar Ganeesh
Usman Gohar
Lu Cheng
Golnoosh Farnadi
With fairness concerns gaining significant attention in Machine Learning (ML), several bias mitigation techniques have been proposed, often … (voir plus)compared against each other to find the best method. These benchmarking efforts tend to use a common setup for evaluation under the assumption that providing a uniform environment ensures a fair comparison. However, bias mitigation techniques are sensitive to hyperparameter choices, random seeds, feature selection, etc., meaning that comparison on just one setting can unfairly favour certain algorithms. In this work, we show significant variance in fairness achieved by several algorithms and the influence of the learning pipeline on fairness scores. We highlight that most bias mitigation techniques can achieve comparable performance, given the freedom to perform hyperparameter optimization, suggesting that the choice of the evaluation parameters-rather than the mitigation technique itself-can sometimes create the perceived superiority of one method over another. We hope our work encourages future research on how various choices in the lifecycle of developing an algorithm impact fairness, and trends that guide the selection of appropriate algorithms.
2024-11-17
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge
Hanna Wallach
Meera Desai
Nicholas Pangakis
A. F. Cooper
Angelina Wang
Solon Barocas
Alexandra Chouldechova
Chad Atalla
Su Lin Blodgett
Emily Corvi
P. A. Dow
Jean Garcia-Gathright
Alexandra Olteanu
Stefanie Reed
Emily Sheng
Dan Vann
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
Matthew Vogel
Hannah Washington
Abigail Z. Jacobs … (voir 1 de plus)
Microsoft Research
Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI … (voir plus)(GenAI) systems are especially difficult. We argue that these measurement tasks are highly reminiscent of measurement tasks found throughout the social sciences. With this in mind, we present a framework, grounded in measurement theory from the social sciences, for measuring concepts related to the capabilities, impacts, opportunities, and risks of GenAI systems. The framework distinguishes between four levels: the background concept, the systematized concept, the measurement instrument(s), and the instance-level measurements themselves. This four-level approach differs from the way measurement is typically done in ML, where researchers and practitioners appear to jump straight from background concepts to measurement instruments, with little to no explicit systematization in between. As well as surfacing assumptions, thereby making it easier to understand exactly what the resulting measurements do and do not mean, this framework has two important implications for evaluating evaluations: First, it can enable stakeholders from different worlds to participate in conceptual debates, broadening the expertise involved in evaluating GenAI systems. Second, it brings rigor to operational debates by offering a set of lenses for interrogating the validity of measurement instruments and their resulting measurements.
2024-11-17
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Towards AI-designed genomes using a variational autoencoder
N.K. Dudek
Doina Precup
Genomes encode elaborate networks of genes whose products must seamlessly interact to support living organisms. Humans’ capacity to unders… (voir plus)tand these biological systems is limited by their sheer size and complexity. In this work, we develop a proof of concept framework for training a machine learning algorithm to model bacterial genome composition. To achieve this, we create simplified representations of genomes in the form of binary vectors that indicate the encoded genes, henceforth referred to as genome vectors. A denoising variational autoencoder was trained to accept corrupted genome vectors, in which most genes had been masked, and reconstruct the original. The resulting model, DeepGenomeVector, effectively captures complex dependencies in genomic networks, as evaluated by both qualitative and quantitative metrics. An in-depth functional analysis of a generated genome vector shows that its encoded pathways are interconnected, near complete, and ecologically cohesive. On the test set, where the model’s ability to reconstruct uncorrupted genome vectors was evaluated, AUC and F1 scores of 0.98 and 0.83, respectively, support the model’s strong performance. This work showcases the power of machine learning approaches for synthetic biology and highlights the possibility that AI agents may one day be able to design genomes that animate carbon-based cells.
2024-11-17
bioRxiv (prépublication)
doi.org
IntentGPT: Few-shot Intent Discovery with Large Language Models
Juan A. Rodriguez
Nicholas Botzer
David Vazquez
Chris Pal
Marco Pedersoli
Issam Hadj Laradji
In today's digitally driven world, dialogue systems play a pivotal role in enhancing user interactions, from customer service to virtual ass… (voir plus)istants. In these dialogues, it is important to identify user's goals automatically to resolve their needs promptly. This has necessitated the integration of models that perform Intent Detection. However, users' intents are diverse and dynamic, making it challenging to maintain a fixed set of predefined intents. As a result, a more practical approach is to develop a model capable of identifying new intents as they emerge. We address the challenge of Intent Discovery, an area that has drawn significant attention in recent research efforts. Existing methods need to train on a substantial amount of data for correctly identifying new intents, demanding significant human effort. To overcome this, we introduce IntentGPT, a novel training-free method that effectively prompts Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 to discover new intents with minimal labeled data. IntentGPT comprises an \textit{In-Context Prompt Generator}, which generates informative prompts for In-Context Learning, an \textit{Intent Predictor} for classifying and discovering user intents from utterances, and a \textit{Semantic Few-Shot Sampler} that selects relevant few-shot examples and a set of known intents to be injected into the prompt. Our experiments show that IntentGPT outperforms previous methods that require extensive domain-specific data and fine-tuning, in popular benchmarks, including CLINC and BANKING, among others.
2024-11-16
ArXiv (prépublication)
arxiv.org
arxiv.org
IntentGPT: Few-shot Intent Discovery with Large Language Models
Juan A. Rodriguez
Nicholas Botzer
David Vazquez
Chris Pal
Marco Pedersoli
Issam Hadj Laradji
In today's digitally driven world, dialogue systems play a pivotal role in enhancing user interactions, from customer service to virtual ass… (voir plus)istants. In these dialogues, it is important to identify user's goals automatically to resolve their needs promptly. This has necessitated the integration of models that perform Intent Detection. However, users' intents are diverse and dynamic, making it challenging to maintain a fixed set of predefined intents. As a result, a more practical approach is to develop a model capable of identifying new intents as they emerge. We address the challenge of Intent Discovery, an area that has drawn significant attention in recent research efforts. Existing methods need to train on a substantial amount of data for correctly identifying new intents, demanding significant human effort. To overcome this, we introduce IntentGPT, a novel training-free method that effectively prompts Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 to discover new intents with minimal labeled data. IntentGPT comprises an \textit{In-Context Prompt Generator}, which generates informative prompts for In-Context Learning, an \textit{Intent Predictor} for classifying and discovering user intents from utterances, and a \textit{Semantic Few-Shot Sampler} that selects relevant few-shot examples and a set of known intents to be injected into the prompt. Our experiments show that IntentGPT outperforms previous methods that require extensive domain-specific data and fine-tuning, in popular benchmarks, including CLINC and BANKING, among others.
2024-11-16
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Towards a General Recipe for Combinatorial Optimization with Multi-Filter GNNs
Frederik Wenkel
Semih Cantürk
Stefan Horoi
Michael Perlmutter
Guy Wolf
2024-11-16
logconference.io/LOG/2024/Conference (présentation orale)
openreview.net
openreview.net
UTG: Towards a Unified View of Snapshot and Event Based Models for Temporal Graphs
Shenyang Huang
Farimah Poursafaei
Reihaneh Rabbany
Guillaume Rabusseau
Emanuele Rossi
2024-11-16
logconference.io/LOG/2024/Conference (poster)
doi.org
openreview.net
EDAI Framework for Integrating Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Throughout the Lifecycle of AI to Improve Health and Oral Health Care: Qualitative Study
Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi
Richa Shrivastava
Anita Brown-Johnson
Pascale Caidor
Claire Davies
Amal Idrissi Janati
Pascaline Kengne Talla
Sreenath Madathil
Bettina M Willie
Elham Emami
2024-11-15
Journal of Medical Internet Research (publié)
doi.org
"On the goals of linguistic theory": Revisiting Chomskyan theories in the era of AI
Eva Portelance
Masoud Jasbi
Theoretical linguistics seeks to explain what human language is, and why. Linguists and cognitive scientists have proposed different theoret… (voir plus)ical models of what language is, as well as cognitive factors that shape it, and allow humans to 'produce', 'understand', and 'acquire' natural languages. However, humans may no longer be the only ones learning to 'generate', 'parse', and 'learn' natural language: artificial intelligence (AI) models such as large language models are proving to have impressive linguistic capabilities. Many are thus questioning what role, if any, such models should play in helping theoretical linguistics reach its ultimate research goals? In this paper, we propose to answer this question, by reiterating the tenets of generative linguistics, a leading school of thought in the field, and by considering how AI models as theories of language relate to each of these important concepts. Specifically, we consider three foundational principles, finding roots in the early works of Noam Chomsky: (1) levels of theoretical adequacy; (2) procedures for linguistic theory development; (3) language learnability and Universal Grammar. In our discussions of each principle, we give special attention to two types of AI models: neural language models and neural grammar induction models. We will argue that such models, in particular neural grammar induction models, do have a role to play, but that this role is largely modulated by the stance one takes regarding each of these three guiding principles.
2024-11-15
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
"On the goals of linguistic theory": Revisiting Chomskyan theories in the era of AI
Eva Portelance
Masoud Jasbi
Theoretical linguistics seeks to explain what human language is, and why. Linguists and cognitive scientists have proposed different theoret… (voir plus)ical models of what language is, as well as cognitive factors that shape it, and allow humans to 'produce', 'understand', and 'acquire' natural languages. However, humans may no longer be the only ones learning to 'generate', 'parse', and 'learn' natural language: artificial intelligence (AI) models such as large language models are proving to have impressive linguistic capabilities. Many are thus questioning what role, if any, such models should play in helping theoretical linguistics reach its ultimate research goals? In this paper, we propose to answer this question, by reiterating the tenets of generative linguistics, a leading school of thought in the field, and by considering how AI models as theories of language relate to each of these important concepts. Specifically, we consider three foundational principles, finding roots in the early works of Noam Chomsky: (1) levels of theoretical adequacy; (2) procedures for linguistic theory development; (3) language learnability and Universal Grammar. In our discussions of each principle, we give special attention to two types of AI models: neural language models and neural grammar induction models. We will argue that such models, in particular neural grammar induction models, do have a role to play, but that this role is largely modulated by the stance one takes regarding each of these three guiding principles.
2024-11-15
ArXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org