Publications

Optimal discounting for offline input-driven MDP
Offline reinforcement learning has gained a lot of popularity for its potential to solve industry challenges. However, real-world environmen… (voir plus)ts are often highly stochastic and partially observable, leading long-term planners to overfit to offline data in model-based settings. Input-driven Markov Decision Processes (IDMDPs) offer a way to work with some of the uncertainty by letting designers separate what the agent has control over (states) from what it cannot (inputs) in the environnement. These stochastic external inputs are often difficult to model. Under the assumption that the input model will be imperfect, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff under shallow planning in IDMDPs. Paving the way to input-driven planning horizons, we also investigate the similarity of optimal planning horizons at different inputs given the structure of the input space.
Optimistic critics can empower small actors
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (voir plus)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.
Sampling from Energy-based Policies using Diffusion
Understanding Behavioral Metric Learning: A Large-Scale Study on Distracting Reinforcement Learning Environments
A key approach to state abstraction is approximating behavioral metrics (notably, bisimulation metrics) in the observation space and embeddi… (voir plus)ng these learned distances in the representation space. While promising for robustness to task-irrelevant noise, as shown in prior work, accurately estimating these metrics remains challenging, requiring various design choices that create gaps between theory and practice. Prior evaluations focus mainly on final returns, leaving the quality of learned metrics and the source of performance gains unclear. To systematically assess how metric learning works in deep reinforcement learning (RL), we evaluate five recent approaches, unified conceptually as isometric embeddings with varying design choices. We benchmark them with baselines across 20 state-based and 14 pixel-based tasks, spanning 370 task configurations with diverse noise settings. Beyond final returns, we introduce the evaluation of a denoising factor to quantify the encoder's ability to filter distractions. To further isolate the effect of metric learning, we propose and evaluate an isolated metric estimation setting, in which the encoder is influenced solely by the metric loss. Finally, we release an open-source, modular codebase to improve reproducibility and support future research on metric learning in deep RL.
Can a Bayesian Oracle Prevent Harm from an Agent?
Is there a way to design powerful AI systems based on machine learning methods that would satisfy probabilistic safety guarantees? With the … (voir plus)long-term goal of obtaining a probabilistic guarantee that would apply in every context, we consider estimating a context-dependent bound on the probability of violating a given safety specification. Such a risk evaluation would need to be performed at run-time to provide a guardrail against dangerous actions of an AI. Noting that different plausible hypotheses about the world could produce very different outcomes, and because we do not know which one is right, we derive bounds on the safety violation probability predicted under the true but unknown hypothesis. Such bounds could be used to reject potentially dangerous actions. Our main results involve searching for cautious but plausible hypotheses, obtained by a maximization that involves Bayesian posteriors over hypotheses. We consider two forms of this result, in the iid case and in the non-iid case, and conclude with open problems towards turning such theoretical results into practical AI guardrails.
Mock Deep Testing: Toward Separate Development of Data and Models for Deep Learning
Ruchira Manke
Mohammad Wardat
Hridesh Rajan
While deep learning (DL) has permeated, and become an integral component of many critical software systems, today software engineering resea… (voir plus)rch hasn't explored how to separately test data and models that are integral for DL approaches to work effectively. The main challenge in independently testing these components arises from the tight dependency between data and models. This research explores this gap, introducing our methodology of mock deep testing for unit testing of DL applications. To enable unit testing, we introduce a design paradigm that decomposes the workflow into distinct, manageable components, minimizes sequential dependencies, and modularizes key stages of the DL. For unit testing these components, we propose modeling their dependencies using mocks. This modular approach facilitates independent development and testing of the components, ensuring comprehensive quality assurance throughout the development process. We have developed KUnit, a framework for enabling mock deep testing for the Keras library. We empirically evaluated KUnit to determine the effectiveness of mocks. Our assessment of 50 DL programs obtained from Stack Overflow and GitHub shows that mocks effectively identified 10 issues in the data preparation stage and 53 issues in the model design stage. We also conducted a user study with 36 participants using KUnit to perceive the effectiveness of our approach. Participants using KUnit successfully resolved 25 issues in the data preparation stage and 38 issues in the model design stage. Our findings highlight that mock objects provide a lightweight emulation of the dependencies for unit testing, facilitating early bug detection. Lastly, to evaluate the usability of KUnit, we conducted a post-study survey. The results reveal that KUnit is helpful to DL application developers, enabling them to independently test each component effectively in different stages.
Kernel-Level Event-Based Performance Anomaly Detection in Software Systems under Varying Load Conditions
Anthonia Njoku
Heng Li
The Search for Squawk: Agile Modeling in Bioacoustics
Otilia Stretcu
Jenny Hamer
Lauren Harrell
Rob Laber
Amanda K. Navine
Patrick Hart
Ben Williams
Timothy A. C. Lamont
Tries B. Rasak
Mars Coral Restoration Team
Sheryn Brodie
Brendan Doohan
Philip Eichinski
Paul Roe
Lin Schwarzkopf
Tom Denton
Ant Colony Sampling with GFlowNets for Combinatorial Optimization
We present the Generative Flow Ant Colony Sampler (GFACS), a novel meta-heuristic method that hierarchically combines amortized inference an… (voir plus)d parallel stochastic search. Our method first leverages Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) to amortize a \emph{multi-modal} prior distribution over combinatorial solution space that encompasses both high-reward and diversified solutions. This prior is iteratively updated via parallel stochastic search in the spirit of Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), leading to the posterior distribution that generates near-optimal solutions. Extensive experiments across seven combinatorial optimization problems demonstrate GFACS's promising performances.
Fair Resource Allocation in Weakly Coupled Markov Decision Processes
We consider fair resource allocation in sequential decision-making environments modeled as weakly coupled Markov decision processes, where r… (voir plus)esource constraints couple the action spaces of
Q-learning for Quantile MDPs: A Decomposition, Performance, and Convergence Analysis
Jia Lin Hau
Mohammad Ghavamzadeh
Marek Petrik
In Markov decision processes (MDPs), quantile risk measures such as Value-at-Risk are a standard metric for modeling RL agents' preferences … (voir plus)for certain outcomes. This paper proposes a new Q-learning algorithm for quantile optimization in MDPs with strong convergence and performance guarantees. The algorithm leverages a new, simple dynamic program (DP) decomposition for quantile MDPs. Compared with prior work, our DP decomposition requires neither known transition probabilities nor solving complex saddle point equations and serves as a suitable foundation for other model-free RL algorithms. Our numerical results in tabular domains show that our Q-learning algorithm converges to its DP variant and outperforms earlier algorithms.
On the Identifiability of Causal Abstractions
Sékou-Oumar Kaba
Causal representation learning (CRL) enhances machine learning models' robustness and generalizability by learning structural causal models … (voir plus)associated with data-generating processes. We focus on a family of CRL methods that uses contrastive data pairs in the observable space, generated before and after a random, unknown intervention, to identify the latent causal model. (Brehmer et al., 2022) showed that this is indeed possible, given that all latent variables can be intervened on individually. However, this is a highly restrictive assumption in many systems. In this work, we instead assume interventions on arbitrary subsets of latent variables, which is more realistic. We introduce a theoretical framework that calculates the degree to which we can identify a causal model, given a set of possible interventions, up to an abstraction that describes the system at a higher level of granularity.