Foutse Khomh

Biography

Foutse Khomh is a full professor of software engineering at Polytechnique Montréal, a Canada CIFAR AI Chair – Trustworthy Machine Learning Software Systems, and an FRQ-IVADO Research Chair in Software Quality Assurance for Machine Learning Applications. Khomh completed a PhD in software engineering at Université de Montréal in 2011, for which he received an Award of Excellence. He was also awarded a CS-Can/Info-Can Outstanding Young Computer Science Researcher Prize in 2019.

His research interests include software maintenance and evolution, machine learning systems engineering, cloud engineering, and dependable and trustworthy ML/AI. His work has received four Ten-year Most Influential Paper (MIP) awards, and six Best/Distinguished Paper Awards. He has served on the steering committee of numerous organizations in software engineering, including SANER (chair), MSR, PROMISE, ICPC (chair), and ICSME (vice-chair). He initiated and co-organized Polytechnique Montréal‘s Software Engineering for Machine Learning Applications (SEMLA) symposium and the RELENG (release engineering) workshop series.

Khomh co-founded the NSERC CREATE SE4AI: A Training Program on the Development, Deployment and Servicing of Artificial Intelligence-based Software Systems, and is a principal investigator for the DEpendable Explainable Learning (DEEL) project.

He also co-founded Confiance IA, a Quebec consortium focused on building trustworthy AI, and is on the editorial board of multiple international software engineering journals, including IEEE Software, EMSE and JSEP. He is a senior member of IEEE.

Current Students

Nanda Assobjio Brice Yvan

Master's Research - Polytechnique Montréal

Ahmed Haj Yahmed

Master's Research - Polytechnique Montréal

Gabriel Laberge

PhD - Polytechnique Montréal

forough majidi

PhD - Polytechnique Montréal

Website

mohammadhossein.malekpour@gmail.com

Mohammadhossein Malekpour

Master's Research - Polytechnique Montréal

Elnathan Tiokou Tiokou Fangang

Arghavan Moradi Dakhel

Postdoctorate - Polytechnique Montréal

Master's Research - Polytechnique Montréal

PhD - Polytechnique Montréal

Publications

In-Simulation Testing of Deep Learning Vision Models in Autonomous Robotic Manipulators

Dmytro Humeniuk

Houssem Ben Braiek

Thomas Reid

2024-10-27

Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (published)

Toward Debugging Deep Reinforcement Learning Programs with RLExplorer

Rached Bouchoucha

Ahmed Haj Yahmed

Darshan Patil

Janarthanan Rajendran

Amin Nikanjam

Sarath Chandar

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has shown success in diverse domains such as robotics, computer games, and recommendation systems. However… (see more), like any other software system, DRL-based software systems are susceptible to faults that pose unique challenges for debugging and diagnosing. These faults often result in unexpected behavior without explicit failures and error messages, making debugging difficult and time-consuming. Therefore, automating the monitoring and diagnosis of DRL systems is crucial to alleviate the burden on developers. In this paper, we propose RLExplorer, the first fault diagnosis approach for DRL-based software systems. RLExplorer automatically monitors training traces and runs diagnosis routines based on properties of the DRL learning dynamics to detect the occurrence of DRL-specific faults. It then logs the results of these diagnoses as warnings that cover theoretical concepts, recommended practices, and potential solutions to the identified faults. We conducted two sets of evaluations to assess RLExplorer. Our first evaluation of faulty DRL samples from Stack Overflow revealed that our approach can effectively diagnose real faults in 83% of the cases. Our second evaluation of RLExplorer with 15 DRL experts/developers showed that (1) RLExplorer could identify 3.6 times more defects than manual debugging and (2) RLExplorer is easily integrated into DRL applications.

2024-10-06

ArXiv (preprint)

What Information Contributes to Log-based Anomaly Detection? Insights from a Configurable Transformer-Based Approach

Xingfang Wu

Heng Li

Log data are generated from logging statements in the source code, providing insights into the execution processes of software applications … (see more)and systems. State-of-the-art log-based anomaly detection approaches typically leverage deep learning models to capture the semantic or sequential information in the log data and detect anomalous runtime behaviors. However, the impacts of these different types of information are not clear. In addition, existing approaches have not captured the timestamps in the log data, which can potentially provide more fine-grained temporal information than sequential information. In this work, we propose a configurable transformer-based anomaly detection model that can capture the semantic, sequential, and temporal information in the log data and allows us to configure the different types of information as the model's features. Additionally, we train and evaluate the proposed model using log sequences of different lengths, thus overcoming the constraint of existing methods that rely on fixed-length or time-windowed log sequences as inputs. With the proposed model, we conduct a series of experiments with different combinations of input features to evaluate the roles of different types of information in anomaly detection. When presented with log sequences of varying lengths, the model can attain competitive and consistently stable performance compared to the baselines. The results indicate that the event occurrence information plays a key role in identifying anomalies, while the impact of the sequential and temporal information is not significant for anomaly detection in the studied public datasets. On the other hand, the findings also reveal the simplicity of the studied public datasets and highlight the importance of constructing new datasets that contain different types of anomalies to better evaluate the performance of anomaly detection models.

2024-09-30

ArXiv (preprint)

Understanding Web Application Workloads and Their Applications: Systematic Literature Review and Characterization

Roozbeh Aghili

Qiaolin Qin

Heng Li

2024-09-18

ArXiv (preprint)

An Empirical Study of Sensitive Information in Logs

Roozbeh Aghili

Heng Li

2024-09-17

ArXiv (preprint)

Trimming the Risk: Towards Reliable Continuous Training for Deep Learning Inspection Systems

Altaf Allah Abbassi

Houssem Ben Braiek

Thomas Reid

2024-09-13

ArXiv (preprint)

Reputation Gaming in Crowd Technical Knowledge Sharing

Iren Mazloomzadeh

Gias Uddin

Ashkan Sami

Stack Overflow incentive system awards users with reputation scores to ensure quality. The decentralized nature of the forum may make the in… (see more)centive system prone to manipulation. This paper offers, for the first time, a comprehensive study of the reported types of reputation manipulation scenarios that might be exercised in Stack Overflow and the prevalence of such reputation gamers by a qualitative study of 1,697 posts from meta Stack Exchange sites. We found four different types of reputation fraud scenarios, such as voting rings where communities form to upvote each other repeatedly on similar posts. We developed algorithms that enable platform managers to automatically identify these suspicious reputation gaming scenarios for review. The first algorithm identifies isolated/semi-isolated communities where probable reputation frauds may occur mostly by collaborating with each other. The second algorithm looks for sudden unusual big jumps in the reputation scores of users. We evaluated the performance of our algorithms by examining the reputation history dashboard of Stack Overflow users from the Stack Overflow website. We observed that around 60-80% of users flagged as suspicious by our algorithms experienced reductions in their reputation scores by Stack Overflow.

2024-09-04

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (published)

Assessing Programming Task Difficulty for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models

Florian Tambon

Amin Nikanjam

Giuliano Antoniol

2024-07-30

ArXiv (preprint)

An empirical study of testing machine learning in the wild

Moses Openja

Armstrong Foundjem

Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang

Zhenyou Jiang

Mouna Abidi

Ahmed E. Hassan

Background: Recently, machine and deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms have been increasingly adopted in many software systems. Due to their in… (see more)ductive nature, ensuring the quality of these systems remains a significant challenge for the research community. Traditionally, software systems were constructed deductively, by writing explicit rules that govern the behavior of the system as program code. However, ML/DL systems infer rules from training data i.e., they are generated inductively). Recent research in ML/DL quality assurance has adapted concepts from traditional software testing, such as mutation testing, to improve reliability. However, it is unclear if these proposed testing techniques are adopted in practice, or if new testing strategies have emerged from real-world ML deployments. There is little empirical evidence about the testing strategies. Aims: To fill this gap, we perform the first fine-grained empirical study on ML testing in the wild to identify the ML properties being tested, the testing strategies, and their implementation throughout the ML workflow. Method: We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand ML software testing practices. We analyzed test files and cases from 11 open-source ML/DL projects on GitHub. Using open coding, we manually examined the testing strategies, tested ML properties, and implemented testing methods to understand their practical application in building and releasing ML/DL software systems. Results: Our findings reveal several key insights: 1.) The most common testing strategies, accounting for less than 40%, are Grey-box and White-box methods, such as Negative Testing , Oracle Approximation , and Statistical Testing . 2.) A wide range of \(17\) ML properties are tested, out of which only 20% to 30% are frequently tested, including Consistency , Correctness , and Efficiency . 3.) Bias and Fairness is more tested in Recommendation (6%) and CV (3.9%) systems, while Security & Privacy is tested in CV (2%), Application Platforms (0.9%), and NLP (0.5%). 4.) We identified 13 types of testing methods, such as Unit Testing , Input Testing , and Model Testing . Conclusions: This study sheds light on the current adoption of software testing techniques and highlights gaps and limitations in existing ML testing practices.

2024-07-24

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (published)

DeepCodeProbe: Towards Understanding What Models Trained on Code Learn

Vahid Majdinasab

Amin Nikanjam

2024-07-11

ArXiv (preprint)