Développez des compétences fondamentales en intelligence artificielle (IA) responsable grâce à des cours autodirigés, animés par des expert·e·s de Mila reconnu·e·s à l’échelle internationale.
Le Fellowship Mila en politiques de l'IA transforme l'expertise approfondie en IA en politiques rigoureuses d'intérêt public. Découvrez la dernière publication Combler la disparité en matière d’expertise : mécanismes de transfert des connaissances pour la réglementation de l’IA par Moritz von Knebel.
Ce programme soutient les startups spécialisées en IA à tout moment de l'année. Bénéficiez de ressources de pointe et d'un accompagnement sur mesure pour accélérer le développement de votre technologie.
Nous utilisons des témoins pour analyser le trafic et l’utilisation de notre site web, afin de personnaliser votre expérience. Vous pouvez désactiver ces technologies à tout moment, mais cela peut restreindre certaines fonctionnalités du site. Consultez notre Politique de protection de la vie privée pour en savoir plus.
Paramètre des cookies
Vous pouvez activer et désactiver les types de cookies que vous souhaitez accepter. Cependant certains choix que vous ferez pourraient affecter les services proposés sur nos sites (ex : suggestions, annonces personnalisées, etc.).
Cookies essentiels
Ces cookies sont nécessaires au fonctionnement du site et ne peuvent être désactivés. (Toujours actif)
Cookies analyse
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour mesurer l'audience de nos sites ?
Lecteur Multimédia
Acceptez-vous l'utilisation de cookies pour afficher et vous permettre de regarder les contenus vidéo hébergés par nos partenaires (YouTube, etc.) ?
Fine-tuning on narrow harmful tasks can cause emergent misalignment, where models generalize harmful behavior beyond the training distributi… (voir plus)on. Inoculation prompting can reduce this effect by explicitly eliciting the undesired behavior during training, but recent work shows that the behavior can reappear when evaluation prompts contain cues from the training context. We study what makes such prompts effective triggers. We find that textual similarity to the inoculation prompt is an incomplete predictor: prompts are more likely to re-elicit suppressed behavior when they induce activation states similar to those produced by the inoculation context. These findings advance our understanding of how inoculation prompting modulates conditional misalignment, and suggest that activation-space analysis can help identify when suppressed behaviors remain accessible under eval-time prompts.
Large language models finetuned on narrow harmful tasks are prone to
emergent misalignment (EM), where harmful behavior generalizes beyond t… (voir plus)he
training distribution. Interleaving benign data during finetuning has been
proposed as a mitigation, but recent work disagrees on whether it prevents
EM. In this paper, we investigate this disagreement on Qwen-2.5 7B and 32B, and find that no single property of the interleaved data, taken
in isolation, accounts for the gap. Instead, much of it traces to the
evaluation itself, as the standard EM benchmark is sensitive to the length
of the prompts it uses, and lengthening the evaluation prompts substantially
shifts measured misalignment across model sizes. We then identify a
region in the model's activations that predicts whether a given
interleaved set will prevent EM, and show that reformulating benign data
to fall within it substantially reduces EM on both 7B and 32B. This suggests that the standard EM benchmark, which relies on short prompts, may misrepresent the effectiveness of proposed mitigations.
Component attribution methods provide insight into how parts of deep learning models, such as convolutional filters and attention heads, inf… (voir plus)luence model predictions. Despite their successes, existing attribution approaches typically assume component effects are additive and independent, neglecting complex interactions among components. Capturing these relations between components is crucial for a better mechanistic understanding of these models. In this work, we improve component attribution (COAR) by replacing the linear counterfactual estimator with a Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) surrogate fitted to example‑wise perturbation–response data. Then, a symbolic approximation of the learned KAN lets us compute mixed partial derivatives that captures and makes explicit high‑order component interactions that linear methods are missing. These symbolic expressions facilitate future integration with formal verification methods, enabling richer counterfactual analyses of internal model behavior. Preliminary results on standard image classification models demonstrate that our approach improves the accuracy of predicted counterfactuals and enable extraction of higher-order component interactions compared to linear attribution methods.