Randy Lefebvre

The Cost of Commitment in Option-Based Hierarchical RL

Empirically, option-based hierarchical reinforcement (HRL) learning often produces longer and more diverse options when a deliberation cost … (voir plus)is charged at option boundaries. However, when options are executed for many steps under an approximate dynamics model, small model errors compound along the option, degrading the quality of the resulting plan. In this work, we introduce the commitment loss to formalize the tradeoff between deliberation cost and model error as a function of option duration. We characterize how optimal termination probabilities vary with this tradeoff under two model-error mechanisms. First, the model is learned from finite data via maximum-likelihood estimation, producing statistical error that interacts with option duration. Second, we consider an input-driven setting where an exogenous input is only observed at option boundaries and evolves unobserved between them, creating a drift-induced mismatch between planned and realized dynamics. In both cases, we solve for the optimal termination behavior as a function of deliberation cost and the error scale, clarifying the behavior of some popular HRL algorithms that approach the deliberation cost as a heuristic.

2026-04-29

International Conference on Machine Learning (accepté)

openreview.net

Optimal discounting for offline input-driven MDP

Randy Lefebvre

Audrey Durand

Offline reinforcement learning has gained a lot of popularity for its potential to solve industry challenges. However, real-world environmen… (voir plus)ts are often highly stochastic and partially observable, leading long-term planners to overfit to offline data in model-based settings. Input-driven Markov Decision Processes (IDMDPs) offer a way to work with some of the uncertainty by letting designers separate what the agent has control over (states) from what it cannot (inputs) in the environnement. These stochastic external inputs are often difficult to model. Under the assumption that the input model will be imperfect, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff under shallow planning in IDMDPs. Paving the way to input-driven planning horizons, we also investigate the similarity of optimal planning horizons at different inputs given the structure of the input space.

2025-05-08

rl-conference.cc/RLC/2025/Conference (accepté)

openreview.net