Portrait de Foutse Khomh

Foutse Khomh

Membre académique associé
Chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR
Professeur, Polytechnique Montréal, Département de génie informatique et génie logiciel
Sujets de recherche
Apprentissage de la programmation
Apprentissage par renforcement
Apprentissage profond
Exploration des données
Modèles génératifs
Systèmes distribués
Traitement du langage naturel

Biographie

Foutse Khomh est professeur titulaire de génie logiciel à Polytechnique Montréal, titulaire d'une chaire en IA Canada-CIFAR dans le domaine des systèmes logiciels d'apprentissage automatique fiables, et titulaire d'une chaire de recherche FRQ-IVADO sur l'assurance qualité des logiciels pour les applications d'apprentissage automatique.

Il a obtenu un doctorat en génie logiciel de l'Université de Montréal en 2011, avec une bourse d'excellence. Il a également reçu le prix CS-Can/Info-Can du meilleur jeune chercheur en informatique en 2019. Ses recherches portent sur la maintenance et l'évolution des logiciels, l'ingénierie des systèmes d'apprentissage automatique, l'ingénierie en nuage et l’IA/apprentissage automatique fiable et digne de confiance.

Ses travaux ont été récompensés par quatre prix de l’article le plus important Most Influential Paper en dix ans et six prix du meilleur article ou de l’article exceptionnel (Best/Distinguished Paper). Il a également siégé au comité directeur de plusieurs conférences et rencontres : SANER (comme président), MSR, PROMISE, ICPC (comme président) et ICSME (en tant que vice-président). Il a initié et coorganisé le symposium Software Engineering for Machine Learning Applications (SEMLA) et la série d'ateliers Release Engineering (RELENG).

Il est cofondateur du projet CRSNG CREATE SE4AI : A Training Program on the Development, Deployment, and Servicing of Artificial Intelligence-based Software Systems et l'un des chercheurs principaux du projet Dependable Explainable Learning (DEEL). Il est également cofondateur de l'initiative québécoise sur l'IA digne de confiance (Confiance IA Québec). Il fait partie du comité de rédaction de plusieurs revues internationales de génie logiciel (dont IEEE Software, EMSE, JSEP) et est membre senior de l'Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

Étudiants actuels

Publications

Machine Learning Application Development: Practitioners' Insights
Md Saidur Rahman
Alaleh Hamidi
Jinghui Cheng
Giuliano Antoniol
Hironori Washizaki
Nowadays, intelligent systems and services are getting increasingly popular as they provide data-driven solutions to diverse real-world prob… (voir plus)lems, thanks to recent breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). However, machine learning meets software engineering not only with promising potentials but also with some inherent challenges. Despite some recent research efforts, we still do not have a clear understanding of the challenges of developing ML-based applications and the current industry practices. Moreover, it is unclear where software engineering researchers should focus their efforts to better support ML application developers. In this paper, we report about a survey that aimed to understand the challenges and best practices of ML application development. We synthesize the results obtained from 80 practitioners (with diverse skills, experience, and application domains) into 17 findings; outlining challenges and best practices for ML application development. Practitioners involved in the development of ML-based software systems can leverage the summarized best practices to improve the quality of their system. We hope that the reported challenges will inform the research community about topics that need to be investigated to improve the engineering process and the quality of ML-based applications.
A Probabilistic Framework for Mutation Testing in Deep Neural Networks
Florian Tambon
Giuliano Antoniol
Studying the challenges of developing hardware description language programs
Fatemeh Yousefifeshki
Heng Li
Refactoring practices in the context of data-intensive systems
Biruk Asmare Muse
Giuliano Antoniol
AmbieGen tool at the SBST 2022 Tool Competition
Dmytro Humeniuk
Giuliano Antoniol
AmbieGen is a tool for generating test cases for cyber-physical systems (CPS). In the context of SBST 2022 CPS tool competition, it has been… (voir plus) adapted to generating virtual roads to test a car lane keeping assist system. AmbieGen leverages a two objective NSGA-II algorithm to produce the test cases. It has achieved the highest final score, accounting for the test case efficiency, effectiveness and diversity in both testing configurations.
Challenges in machine learning application development
Md Saidur Rahman
Emilio Rivera
Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc
Bernd Lehnert
SAP is the market leader in enterprise application software offering an end-to-end suite of applications and services to enable their custom… (voir plus)ers worldwide to operate their business. Especially, retail customers of SAP deal with millions of sales transactions for their day-to-day business. Transactions are created during retail sales at the point of sale (POS) terminals and those transactions are then sent to some central servers for validations and other business operations. A considerable proportion of the retail transactions may have inconsistencies or anomalies due to many technical and human errors. SAP provides an automated process for error detection but still requires a manual process by dedicated employees using workbench software for correction. However, manual corrections of these errors are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and might be prone to further errors due to incorrect modifications. Thus, automated detection and correction of transaction errors are very important regarding their potential business values and the improvement in the business workflow. In this paper, we report on our experience from a project where we develop an AI-based system to automatically detect transaction errors and propose corrections. We identify and discuss the challenges that we faced during this collaborative research and development project, from two distinct perspectives: Software Engineering and Machine Learning. We report on our experience and insights from the project with guidelines for the identified challenges. We collect developers’ feedback for qualitative analysis of our findings. We believe that our findings and recommendations can help other researchers and practitioners embarking into similar endeavours. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Programming teams.
Fooling SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling
Ulrich Matchi Aïvodji
Satoshi Hara
Mario Marchand
SHAP explanations aim at identifying which features contribute the most to the difference in model prediction at a specific input versus a … (voir plus)background distribution. Recent studies have shown that they can be manipulated by malicious adversaries to produce arbitrary desired explanations. However, existing attacks focus solely on altering the black-box model itself. In this paper, we propose a complementary family of attacks that leave the model intact and manipulate SHAP explanations using stealthily biased sampling of the data points used to approximate expectations w.r.t the background distribution. In the context of fairness audit, we show that our attack can reduce the importance of a sensitive feature when explaining the difference in outcomes between groups, while remaining undetected. These results highlight the manipulability of SHAP explanations and encourage auditors to treat post-hoc explanations with skepticism.
Studying Logging Practice in Machine Learning-based Applications
Patrick Loic Foalem
Heng Li
Logging is a common practice in traditional software development. Several research works have been done to investigate the different charact… (voir plus)eristics of logging practices in traditional software systems (e.g., Android applications, JAVA applications, C/C++ applications). Nowadays, we are witnessing more and more development of Machine Learning-based applications (ML-based applications). Today, there are many popular libraries that facilitate and contribute to the development of such applications, among which we can mention: Pytorch, Tensorflow, Theano, MXNet, Scikit-Learn, Caffe, and Keras. Despite the popularity of ML, we don't have a clear understanding of logging practices in ML applications. In this paper, we aim to fill this knowledge gap and help ML practitioners understand the characteristics of logging in ML-based applications. In particular, we conduct an empirical study on 110 open-source ML-based applications. Through a quantitative analysis, we find that logging practice in ML-based applications is less pervasive than in traditional applications including Android, JAVA, and C/C++ applications. Furthermore, the majority of logging statements in ML-based applications are in info and warn levels, compared to traditional applications where info is the majority of logging statement in C/C++ application and debug, error levels constitute the majority of logging statement in Android application. We also perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis of a random sample of logging statements to understand where ML developers put most of logging statements and examine why and how they are using logging. These analyses led to the following observations: (i) ML developers put most of the logging statements in model training, and in non-ML components. (ii) Data and model management appear to be the main reason behind the introduction of logging statements in ML-based applications.
SmOOD: Smoothness-based Out-of-Distribution Detection Approach for Surrogate Neural Networks in Aircraft Design
Ali Tfaily
Thomas Reid
Ciro Guida
Can Ensembling Pre-processing Algorithms Lead to Better Machine Learning Fairness?
Khaled Badran
Pierre-Olivier Côté
Amanda Kolopanis
Rached Bouchoucha
Antonio Collante
Diego Elias Costa
Emad Shihab
As machine learning (ML) systems get adopted in more critical areas, it has become increasingly crucial to address the bias that could occur… (voir plus) in these systems. Several fairness pre-processing algorithms are available to alleviate implicit biases during model training. These algorithms employ different concepts of fairness, often leading to conflicting strategies with consequential trade-offs between fairness and accuracy. In this work, we evaluate three popular fairness pre-processing algorithms and investigate the potential for combining all algorithms into a more robust pre-processing ensemble. We report on lessons learned that can help practitioners better select fairness algorithms for their models.
GitHub Copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or Liability?
Vahid Majdinasab
Amin Nikanjam
Michel C. Desmarais
Z. Jiang
Automatic program synthesis is a long-lasting dream in software engineering. Recently, a promising Deep Learning (DL) based solution, called… (voir plus) Copilot, has been proposed by OpenAI and Microsoft as an industrial product. Although some studies evaluate the correctness of Copilot solutions and report its issues, more empirical evaluations are necessary to understand how developers can benefit from it effectively. In this paper, we study the capabilities of Copilot in two different programming tasks: (i) generating (and reproducing) correct and efficient solutions for fundamental algorithmic problems, and (ii) comparing Copilot's proposed solutions with those of human programmers on a set of programming tasks. For the former, we assess the performance and functionality of Copilot in solving selected fundamental problems in computer science, like sorting and implementing data structures. In the latter, a dataset of programming problems with human-provided solutions is used. The results show that Copilot is capable of providing solutions for almost all fundamental algorithmic problems, however, some solutions are buggy and non-reproducible. Moreover, Copilot has some difficulties in combining multiple methods to generate a solution. Comparing Copilot to humans, our results show that the correct ratio of humans' solutions is greater than Copilot's suggestions, while the buggy solutions generated by Copilot require less effort to be repaired.
Impact in Software Engineering Activities After One Year of COVID-19 Restrictions for Startups and Established Companies
Hosna Hooshyar
Eduardo Guerra
Jorge Melegati
Dron Khanna
Abdullah Aldaeej
Gerardo Matturro
Luciana Zaina
Des Greer
Usman Rafiq
Rafael Chanin
Xiaofeng Wang
Juan Garbajosa
Pekka Abrahamsson
Anh Nguyen-Duc
The restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic required software development teams to adapt, being forced to work remotely and adjust the… (voir plus) software engineering activities accordingly. In the studies evaluating these effects, a few have assessed the impact on software engineering activities from a broader perspective and after a period of time when teams had time to adjust to the changes. No studies have been found comparing software startups and established companies either. This paper aims to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on software development activities after one year of the pandemic restrictions, comparing the results between startups and established companies. Our approach was to design a cross-sectional survey and distribute it online among software development companies worldwide. The participants were asked about their perception of COVID-19’s pandemic impact on different software engineering activities: requirements engineering, software architecture, user experience design, software implementation, and software quality assurance. The survey received 170 valid answers from 29 countries, and for all the software engineering activities, we found that most respondents did not observe a significant impact. The results also showed that software startups and established companies were affected differently since, in some activities, we found a negative impact in the former and a positive impact in the latter. Regarding the time spent on each software engineering activity, most of the answers reported no change, but on those that did, the result points to an increase in time. Thus, we cannot find any relation between the change in time of effort and the reported positive or negative impact.