Portrait de Sifan Wu n'est pas disponible

Sifan Wu

Alumni

Publications

One Policy Is Enough: Single-Agent Reinforcement Learning Outperforms Tree Search for Chemistry Tool Learning
Armin Dariani
Sifan Wu
Bang Liu
Entao Yang
Chemistry questions often demand exact computation and database lookups that a language model cannot supply from its parameters, so it must … (voir plus)reach for external tools. Tool use here is a three-part problem: select the right tool from a large pool, fill it with correctly typed arguments, and chain calls so that each consumes the outputs of the last. CheMatAgent, a previously published system, addresses this with hierarchical evolutionary MCTS: separate policy and execution models searching tool-call trees under two learned critics, one regressed partly onto GPT-assigned scores. We show that a single policy suffices. Our model interleaves reasoning, tool calls, and returns in one left-to-right generation, trained by a supervised warm-up and then outcome-level reinforcement learning against a programmatic reward read directly off the gold call chain, which leaves no learned critic and no judge in the training loop. On ChemToolBench multiple-tool comprehensive chemistry, on both backbones CheMatAgent use, we improve Tool F1 by 5.5% and Return F1 by 9.6% on Qwen-2.5-7B, and by 3.7% and 3.9% on Llama-3.1-8B, compared with their strongest search configuration, at one model invocation per question, against a search whose cost grows with the tree; we also lead answer Pass Rate on Qwen-2.5-7B.
2026-08-30
arXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org
What to Ask Next? Probing the Imaginative Reasoning of LLMs with TurtleSoup Puzzles
Mengtao Zhou
Sifan Wu
Huan Zhang
Qi Sima
Bang Liu
We investigate the capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) for imaginative reasoning—the proactive construction, testing, and revision of… (voir plus) hypotheses in information-sparse environments. Existing benchmarks, often static or focused on social deduction, fail to capture the dynamic, exploratory nature of this reasoning process. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive research framework based on the classic "Turtle Soup" game, integrating a benchmark, an agent, and an evaluation protocol. We present TurtleSoup-Bench, the first large-scale, bilingual, interactive benchmark for imaginative reasoning, comprising 800 turtle soup stories sourced from both the Internet and expert authors. We also propose Mosaic-Agent, a novel agent designed to assess LLMs' performance in this setting. To evaluate reasoning quality, we develop a multi-dimensional protocol measuring logical consistency, detail completion, and conclusion alignment. Experiments with leading LLMs reveal clear capability limits, common failure patterns, and a significant performance gap compared to humans. Our work offers new insights into LLMs' imaginative reasoning and establishes a foundation for future research on exploratory agent behavior.
2026-03-13
AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publié)
doi.org
arxiv.org
Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
Huan Zhang
Yizhan Li
Wenhao Huang
Ziyu Hou
Yu Song
Xuye Liu
Farshid Effaty
Jinya Jiang
Sifan Wu
Qianggang Ding
Izumi Takahara
Leonard R. MacGillivray
Teruyasu Mizoguchi
Tianshu Yu
Lizi Liao
Yuyu Luo
Yu Rong
Jia LI
Ying Diao
Heng Ji … (voir 1 de plus)
Bang Liu
The convergence of artificial intelligence and materials science presents a transformative opportunity, but achieving true acceleration in d… (voir plus)iscovery requires moving beyond task-isolated, fine-tuned models toward agentic systems that plan, act, and learn across the full discovery loop. This survey advances a unique pipeline-centric view that spans from corpus curation and pretraining, through domain adaptation and instruction tuning, to goal-conditioned agents interfacing with simulation and experimental platforms. Unlike prior reviews, we treat the entire process as an end-to-end system to be optimized for tangible discovery outcomes rather than proxy benchmarks. This perspective allows us to trace how upstream design choices-such as data curation and training objectives-can be aligned with downstream experimental success through effective credit assignment. To bridge communities and establish a shared frame of reference, we first present an integrated lens that aligns terminology, evaluation, and workflow stages across AI and materials science. We then analyze the field through two focused lenses: From the AI perspective, the survey details LLM strengths in pattern recognition, predictive analytics, and natural language processing for literature mining, materials characterization, and property prediction; from the materials science perspective, it highlights applications in materials design, process optimization, and the acceleration of computational workflows via integration with external tools (e.g., DFT, robotic labs). Finally, we contrast passive, reactive approaches with agentic design, cataloging current contributions while motivating systems that pursue long-horizon goals with autonomy, memory, and tool use. This survey charts a practical roadmap towards autonomous, safety-aware LLM agents aimed at discovering novel and useful materials.
2025-12-31
arXiv (prépublication)
doi.org
arxiv.org