Portrait de Sandrine Bédard n'est pas disponible

Sandrine Bédard

Alumni

Publications

Automated robust segmentation of the spinal canal on MRI
Abel Salmona
Maxime Bouthillier
Gergely David
Maryam Seif
Armin Curt
Nikolai Pfender
Markus Hupp
Patrick Freund
Tomáš Horák
Petr Kudlička
Josef Bednařík
Fauziyya Muhammad
Zachary A. Smith
Spatial distribution of spinal cord fMRI activity with electrocutaneous stimulation
Merve Kaptan
Teresa Indriolo
Dario Pfyffer
Dario Pfyffer
Lindsay Lee
John K Ratliff
Serena S. Hu
Suzanne Tharin
Zachary A. Smith
GARY GLOVER
Sean C Mackey
Kenneth A. Weber
Christine SW Law
Sensory organization at the spinal segment level is commonly inferred from dermatomal maps that assume a fixed correspondence between cutane… (voir plus)ous regions and spinal segments. However, based on the complexities of spinal neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, the distribution of sensory signals within the cord may be broader and less segment-specific than dermatomal maps suggest, leaving the segment-level localization of sensory-evoked activity in humans uncertain. Spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is currently the only technique capable of noninvasively mapping sensory activity with high spatial resolution in the human spinal cord. However, its application remains technically challenging and is limited by the uncertainty in segmental localization. In this study, we leveraged recent advancements in spinal cord fMRI, including spinal nerve rootlet-based spatial normalization, to investigate how sensory information is represented and distributed within the human spinal cord during electrocutaneous stimulation of the third digit of the right hand (i.e., C7 dermatome). Forty healthy adults were scanned with electrocutaneous stimulation at four individualized intensities across multiple runs to quantify (i) the rostrocaudal distribution of sensory-evoked activity, (ii) intensity-dependent changes in detectability and localization, and (iii) the effect of normalization strategy on segmental localization. Across participants, stimulation produced activation localized in the lower cervical cord (e.g., C6-C8), with the most consistent segmental localization near C7. Stronger stimulation increased detectability and produced more consistent segmental localization across participants. Importantly, normalization that incorporated nerve rootlet landmarks sharpened localization and improved sensitivity relative to conventional intervertebral disc-based alignment. This highlights the value of functionally relevant anatomical landmarks for group inference in the spinal cord. Responses were strongest in the initial run and attenuated with repetition, suggesting habituation or adaptation that can bias multi-run paradigms if unmodeled. Together, our results define practical acquisition and analysis conditions (e.g., stimulation strength, anatomical alignment strategy, and run structure) under which segment-level spinal sensory responses can be detected, thereby supporting more reliable studies of human spinal cord future basic and translational studies, including pain mechanisms, sensory function, and spinal injury.
Monitoring morphometric drift in lifelong learning segmentation of the spinal cord.
Enamundram Naga Karthik
Christoph Stefan Aigner
Elise Bannier
Josef Bednařík
Virginie Callot
Anna Combes
Armin Curt
Gergely David
Falk Eippert
Lynn Farner
Michael G. Fehlings
Patrick Freund
Tobias Granberg
Cristina Granziera
Rhscir Network Imaging Group
Ulrike Horn
Tomáš Horák
Suzanne Humphreys … (voir 36 de plus)
Markus Hupp
Anne Kerbrat
Nawal Kinany
Shannon Kolind
Petr Kudlička
Anna Lebret
Lisa Eunyoung Lee
Cristina Granziera
Allan R. Martin
Govind Nair
Megan McGrath
Kristin P. O’Grady
Jiwon Oh
Russell Ouellette
Nikolai Pfender
Dario Pfyffer
Pierre‐François Pradat
Alexandre Prat
Alexandre Prat
Daniel S. Reich
Ilaria Ricchi
Naama Rotem‐Kohavi
Simon Schading-Sassenhausen
Maryam Seif
Andrew Smith
Seth A. Smith
Grace Sweeney
Roger Tam
Anthony Traboulsee
Constantina A. Treaba
Charidimos Tsagkas
Dimitri Van De Ville
Zachary Vavasour
Kenneth A. Weber
Morphometric measures derived from spinal cord segmentations can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in neurological diseases and … (voir plus)injuries affecting the spinal cord. For instance, the spinal cord cross-sectional area can be used to monitor cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis and to characterize compression in degenerative cervical myelopathy. While robust, automatic segmentation methods to a wide variety of contrasts and pathologies have been developed over the past few years, whether their predictions are stable as the model is updated using new datasets has not been assessed. This is particularly important for deriving normative values from healthy participants. In this study, we present a spinal cord segmentation model trained on a multisite (n=75) dataset, including 9 different MRI contrasts and several spinal cord pathologies. We also introduce a lifelong learning framework to automatically monitor the morphometric drift as the model is updated using additional datasets. The framework is triggered by an automatic GitHub Actions workflow every time a new model is created, recording the morphometric values derived from the model's predictions over time. As a real-world application of the proposed framework, we employed the spinal cord segmentation model to update a recently-introduced normative database of healthy participants containing commonly used measures of spinal cord morphometry. Results showed that: (i) our model performs well compared to its previous versions and existing pathology-specific models on the lumbar spinal cord, images with severe compression, and in the presence of intramedullary lesions and/or atrophy achieving an average Dice score of 0.95 ± 0.03; (ii) the automatic workflow for monitoring morphometric drift provides a quick feedback loop for developing future segmentation models; and (iii) the scaling factor required to update the database of morphometric measures is nearly constant among slices across the given vertebral levels, showing minimum drift between the current and previous versions of the model monitored by the framework. The model is freely available in Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.0.
RootletSeg: Deep learning method for spinal rootlets segmentation across MRI contrasts
Katerina Krejci
Jiri Chmelik
Sandrine B'edard
Falk Eippert
Ulrike Horn
Virginie Callot
Purpose: To develop a deep learning method for the automatic segmentation of spinal nerve rootlets on various MRI scans. Material and Method… (voir plus)s: This retrospective study included MRI scans from two open-access and one private dataset, consisting of 3D isotropic 3T TSE T2-weighted (T2w) and 7T MP2RAGE (T1-weighted [T1w] INV1 and INV2, and UNIT1) MRI scans. A deep learning model, RootletSeg, was developed to segment C2-T1 dorsal and ventral spinal rootlets. Training was performed on 76 scans and testing on 17 scans. The Dice score was used to compare the model performance with an existing open-source method. Spinal levels derived from RootletSeg segmentations were compared with vertebral levels defined by intervertebral discs using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The RootletSeg model developed on 93 MRI scans from 50 healthy adults (mean age, 28.70 years
Normalizing Spinal Cord Compression Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Maryam Seif
Armin Curt
Simon Schading-Sassenhausen
Nikolai Pfender
P. Freund
Markus Hupp
Body size and intracranial volume interact with the structure of the central nervous system: A multi-center in vivo neuroimaging study
René Labounek
Monica T. Bondy
Amy L. Paulson
Mihael Abramovic
Eva Alonso-Ortiz
Nicole T. Atcheson
Laura R. Barlow
Robert L. Barry
Markus Barth
Marco Battiston
Christian Büchel
Matthew D. Budde
Virginie Callot
Anna Combes
Benjamin De Leener
Maxime Descoteaux
Paulo Loureiro de Sousa
Marek Dostál
Julien Doyon … (voir 74 de plus)
Adam V. Dvorak
Falk Eippert
Karla R. Epperson
Kevin S. Epperson
Patrick Freund
Jürgen Finsterbusch
Alexandru Foias
Michela Fratini
Issei Fukunaga
Claudia A.M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
Giancarlo Germani
Guillaume Gilbert
Federico Giove
Francesco Grussu
Akifumi Hagiwara
Pierre-Gilles Henry
Tomáš Horák
Masaaki Hori
James M. Joers
Kouhei Kamiya
Haleh Karbasforoushan
Miloš Keřkovský
Ali Khatibi
Joo-Won Kim
Nawal Kinany
Hagen Kitzler
Shannon Kolind
Yazhuo Kong
Petr Kudlička
Paul Kuntke
Nyoman D. Kurniawan
Slawomir Kusmia
Maria Marcella Laganà
Cornelia Laule
Christine S.W. Law
Christine S.W. Law
Tobias Leutritz
Yaou Liu
Sara Llufriu
Sean Mackey
Allan R. Martin
Eloy Martinez-Heras
Loan Mattera
Kristin P. O'Grady
Nico Papinutto
Daniel Papp
Deborah Pareto
Todd B. Parrish
Anna Pichiecchio
Ferran Prados
Àlex Rovira
Marc J. Ruitenberg
Rebecca S. Samson
Giovanni Savini
Maryam Seif
Alan C. Seifert
Alex K. Smith
Seth A. Smith
Zachary A. Smith
Elisabeth Solana
Yuichi Suzuki
George W Tackley
Alexandra Tinnermann
Dimitri Van De Ville
Marios C. Yiannakas
Kenneth A. Weber II
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Richard G. Wise
Patrik O. Wyss
Junqian Xu
Christophe Lenglet
Igor Nestrasil
Clinical research emphasizes the implementation of rigorous and reproducible study designs that rely on between-group matching or controllin… (voir plus)g for sources of biological variation such as subject’s sex and age. However, corrections for body size (i.e., height and weight) are mostly lacking in clinical neuroimaging designs. This study investigates the importance of body size parameters in their relationship with spinal cord (SC) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Data were derived from a cosmopolitan population of 267 healthy human adults (age 30.1 ± 6.6 years old, 125 females). We show that body height correlates with brain gray matter (GM) volume, cortical GM volume, total cerebellar volume, brainstem volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of cervical SC white matter (CSA-WM; 0.44 ≤ r ≤ 0.62). Intracranial volume (ICV) correlates with body height (r = 0.46) and the brain volumes and CSA-WM (0.37 ≤ r ≤ 0.77). In comparison, age correlates with cortical GM volume, precentral GM volume, and cortical thickness (-0.21 ≥ r ≥ -0.27). Body weight correlates with magnetization transfer ratio in the SC WM, dorsal columns, and lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.20 ≥ r ≥ -0.23). Body weight further correlates with the mean diffusivity derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in SC WM (r = -0.20) and dorsal columns (-0.21), but only in males. CSA-WM correlates with brain volumes (0.39 ≤ r ≤ 0.64), and with precentral gyrus thickness and DTI-based fractional anisotropy in SC dorsal columns and SC lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.22 ≥ r ≥ -0.25). Linear mixture of age, sex, or sex and age, explained 2 ± 2%, 24 ± 10%, or 26 ± 10%, of data variance in brain volumetry and SC CSA. The amount of explained variance increased to 33 ± 11%, 41 ± 17%, or 46 ± 17%, when body height, ICV, or body height and ICV were added into the mixture model. In females, the explained variances halved suggesting another unidentified biological factor(s) determining females’ central nervous system (CNS) morphology. In conclusion, body size and ICV are significant biological variables. Along with sex and age, body size should therefore be included as a mandatory variable in the design of clinical neuroimaging studies examining SC and brain structure; and body size and ICV should be considered as covariates in statistical analyses. Normalization of different brain regions with ICV diminishes their correlations with body size, but simultaneously amplifies ICV-related variance (r = 0.72 ± 0.07) and suppresses volume variance of the different brain regions (r = 0.12 ± 0.19) in the normalized measurements.
Rootlets-based registration to the PAM50 spinal cord template
Valeria Oliva
Kenneth A. Weber II
Spinal cord functional MRI studies require precise localization of spinal levels for reliable voxelwise group analyses. Traditional template… (voir plus)-based registration of the spinal cord uses intervertebral discs for alignment. However, substantial anatomical variability across individuals exists between vertebral and spinal levels. This study proposes a novel registration approach that leverages spinal nerve rootlets to improve alignment accuracy and reproducibility across individuals. We developed a registration method leveraging dorsal cervical rootlets segmentation and aligning them non-linearly with the PAM50 spinal cord template. Validation was performed on a multi-subject, multi-site dataset (n=267, 44 sites) and a multi-subject dataset with various neck positions (n=10, 3 sessions). We further validated the method on task-based functional MRI (n=23) to compare group-level activation maps using rootlet-based registration to traditional disc-based methods. Rootlet-based registration showed superior alignment across individuals compared to the traditional disc-based method. Notably, rootlet positions were more stable across neck positions. Group-level analysis of task-based functional MRI using rootlet-based increased Z scores and activation cluster size compared to disc-based registration (number of active voxels from 3292 to 7978). Rootlet-based registration enhances both inter- and intra-subject anatomical alignment and yields better spatial normalization for group-level fMRI analyses. Our findings highlight the potential of rootlet-based registration to improve the precision and reliability of spinal cord neuroimaging group analysis.
Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cord
Enamundram Naga Karthik
Charidimos Tsagkas
Emanuele Pravatà
Cristina Granziera
Andrew Smith
Kenneth Arnold Weber II
Spinal cord segmentation is clinically relevant and is notably used to compute spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) for the diagnosis and … (voir plus)monitoring of cord compression or neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis. While several semi and automatic methods exist, one key limitation remains: the segmentation depends on the MRI contrast, resulting in different CSA across contrasts. This is partly due to the varying appearance of the boundary between the spinal cord and the cerebrospinal fluid that depends on the sequence and acquisition parameters. This contrast-sensitive CSA adds variability in multi-center studies where protocols can vary, reducing the sensitivity to detect subtle atrophies. Moreover, existing methods enhance the CSA variability by training one model per contrast, while also producing binary masks that do not account for partial volume effects. In this work, we present a deep learning-based method that produces soft segmentations of the spinal cord. Using the Spine Generic Public Database of healthy participants (
Body size interacts with the structure of the central nervous system: A multi-center in vivo neuroimaging study
René Labounek
Monica T. Bondy
Amy L. Paulson
Mihael Abramovic
Eva Alonso-Ortiz
Nicole T Atcheson
Laura R. Barlow
Robert L. Barry
Markus Barth
Marco Battiston
Christian Büchel
Matthew D. Budde
Virginie Callot
Anna Combes
Benjamin De Leener
Maxime Descoteaux
Paulo Loureiro de Sousa
Marek Dostál
Julien Doyon … (voir 74 de plus)
Adam V. Dvorak
Falk Eippert
Karla R. Epperson
Kevin S. Epperson
Patrick Freund
Jürgen Finsterbusch
Alexandru Foias
Michela Fratini
Issei Fukunaga
Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
Giancarlo Germani
Guillaume Gilbert
Federico Giove
Francesco Grussu
Akifumi Hagiwara
Pierre-Gilles Henry
Tomáš Horák
Masaaki Hori
James M. Joers
Kouhei Kamiya
Haleh Karbasforoushan
Miloš Keřkovský
Ali Khatibi
Joo-Won Kim
Nawal Kinany
Hagen Kitzler
Shannon Kolind
Yazhuo Kong
Petr Kudlička
Paul Kuntke
Nyoman D. Kurniawan
Slawomir Kusmia
Maria Marcella Laganà
Cornelia Laule
Christine S. W. Law
Christine S. W. Law
Tobias Leutritz
Yaou Liu
Sara Llufriu
Sean Mackey
Allan R. Martin
Eloy Martinez-Heras
Loan Mattera
Kristin P. O’Grady
Nico Papinutto
Daniel Papp
Deborah Pareto
Todd B. Parrish
Anna Pichiecchio
Ferran Prados
Àlex Rovira
Marc J. Ruitenberg
Rebecca S. Samson
Giovanni Savini
Maryam Seif
Alan C. Seifert
Alex K. Smith
Seth A. Smith
Zachary A. Smith
Elisabeth Solana
Yuichi Suzuki
George W Tackley
Alexandra Tinnermann
Dimitri Van De Ville
Marios C. Yiannakas
Kenneth A. Weber
Nikolaus Weiskopf
Richard G. Wise
Patrik O. Wyss
Junqian Xu
Christophe Lenglet
Igor Nestrasil
Clinical research emphasizes the implementation of rigorous and reproducible study designs that rely on between-group matching or controllin… (voir plus)g for sources of biological variation such as subject’s sex and age. However, corrections for body size (i.e. height and weight) are mostly lacking in clinical neuroimaging designs. This study investigates the importance of body size parameters in their relationship with spinal cord (SC) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Data were derived from a cosmopolitan population of 267 healthy human adults (age 30.1±6.6 years old, 125 females). We show that body height correlated strongly or moderately with brain gray matter (GM) volume, cortical GM volume, total cerebellar volume, brainstem volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of cervical SC white matter (CSA-WM; 0.44≤r≤0.62). In comparison, age correlated weakly with cortical GM volume, precentral GM volume, and cortical thickness (−0.21≥r≥−0.27). Body weight correlated weakly with magnetization transfer ratio in the SC WM, dorsal columns, and lateral corticospinal tracts (−0.20≥r≥−0.23). Body weight further correlated weakly with the mean diffusivity derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in SC WM (r=−0.20) and dorsal columns (−0.21), but only in males. CSA-WM correlated strongly or moderately with brain volumes (0.39≤r≤0.64), and weakly with precentral gyrus thickness and DTI-based fractional anisotropy in SC dorsal columns and SC lateral corticospinal tracts (−0.22≥r≥−0.25). Linear mixture of sex and age explained 26±10% of data variance in brain volumetry and SC CSA. The amount of explained variance increased at 33±11% when body height was added into the mixture model. Age itself explained only 2±2% of such variance. In conclusion, body size is a significant biological variable. Along with sex and age, body size should therefore be included as a mandatory variable in the design of clinical neuroimaging studies examining SC and brain structure.
Contrast-agnostic Spinal Cord Segmentation: A Comparative Study of ConvNets and Vision Transformers
Enamundram Naga Karthik
A. Chandar
The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal cord (SC) computed from its segmentation is a relevant clinical biomarker for the diagnosis and… (voir plus) monitoring of cord compression and atrophy. One key limitation of existing automatic methods is that their SC segmentations depend on the MRI contrast, resulting in different CSA across contrasts. Furthermore, these methods rely on CNNs, leaving a gap in the literature for exploring the performance of modern deep learning (DL) architectures. In this study, we extend our recent work \cite{Bdard2023TowardsCS} by evaluating the contrast-agnostic SC segmentation capabilities of different classes of DL architectures, namely, ConvNeXt, vision transformers (ViTs), and hierarchical ViTs. We compared 7 different DL models using the open-source \textit{Spine Generic} Database of healthy participants
Normalizing Spinal Cord Compression Morphometric Measures: Application in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Maryam Seif
Armin Curt
Simon Schadings
M.Sc
Nikolai Pfender
Patrick Freund
Markus Hupp
The study introduced an automatic method for computation of normalized MSCC measures of cord compression from MRI scans, which is an importa… (voir plus)nt step towards better informed therapeutic decisions in DCM patients. The method is open-source and available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox v6.0.
A database of the healthy human spinal cord morphometry in the PAM50 template space
Miloš Keřkovský
Tomáš Rohan
Measures of spinal cord morphometry computed from magnetic resonance images serve as relevant prognostic biomarkers for a range of spinal co… (voir plus)rd pathologies, including traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury and neurodegenerative diseases. However, interpreting these imaging biomarkers is difficult due to considerable intra- and inter-subject variability. Yet, there is no clear consensus on a normalization method that would help reduce this variability and more insights into the distribution of these morphometrics are needed. In this study, we computed a database of normative values for six commonly used measures of spinal cord morphometry: cross-sectional area, anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter, compression ratio, eccentricity, and solidity. Normative values were computed from a large open-access dataset of healthy adult volunteers (N = 203) and were brought to the common space of the PAM50 spinal cord template using a newly proposed normalization method based on linear interpolation. Compared to traditional image-based registration, the proposed normalization approach does not involve image transformations and, therefore, does not introduce distortions of spinal cord anatomy. This is a crucial consideration in preserving the integrity of the spinal cord anatomy in conditions such as spinal cord injury. This new morphometric database allows researchers to normalize based on sex and age, thereby minimizing inter-subject variability associated with demographic and biological factors. The proposed methodology is open-source and accessible through the Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) v6.0 and higher.