Siva Reddy

Biography

Siva Reddy is an assistant professor at the School of Computer Science and in the Department of Linguistics at McGill University. He completed a postdoc with the Stanford NLP Group in September 2019.

Reddy’s research goal is to enable machines with natural language understanding abilities in order to facilitate applications like question answering and conversational systems. His expertise includes building symbolic (linguistic and induced) and deep learning models for language.

Current Students

Vaibhav Adlakha

PhD - McGill University

Master's Research - McGill University

PhD - McGill University

Collaborating researcher - University of Edinburgh

Jay Gala

Master's Research - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Collaborating researcher

Gaurav Kamath

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Timothy O'Donnell

Imene Kerboua

Collaborating researcher - INSA Lyon, France

PhD - McGill University

Principal supervisor :

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Timothy O'Donnell

Aravind Krishnan

Collaborating Alumni - UNIVERSITÄT DES SAARLANDES

Benno Krojer

PhD - McGill University

Zichao Li

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Jackie Cheung

Fengyuan Liu

Master's Research - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Dzmitry Bahdanau

Xing Han Lu

PhD - McGill University

Master's Research - McGill University

Nicholas Meade

PhD - McGill University

Postdoctorate - McGill University

Hanseok Oh

Collaborating researcher

Arkil Patel

PhD - McGill University

Principal supervisor :

Collaborating Alumni

Karolina Ewa Stańczak

Collaborating Alumni - McGill University

Ada Tur

Research Intern - McGill University

PhD - McGill University

Collaborating Alumni - McGill University

How Do We Explain AI and Ensure the Explanation Is True? Faithfulness Measurable Models Tell You How

Blog Posts

October 1, 2024

Andrea Madsen

Siva Reddy

Sarath Chandar

Read the article

Publications

The Promise of RL for Autoregressive Image Editing

Saba Ahmadi

Rabiul Awal

Ankur Sikarwar

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Ge Ya Luo

Juan A. Rodriguez

Sai Rajeswar

We explore three strategies to enhance performance on a wide range of image editing tasks: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), reinforcement learn… (see more)ing (RL), and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. In order to study all these components in one consistent framework, we adopt an autoregressive multimodal model that processes textual and visual tokens in a unified manner. We find RL combined with a large multi-modal LLM verifier to be the most effective of these strategies. As a result, we release EARL: Editing with Autoregression and RL, a strong RL-based image editing model that performs competitively on a diverse range of edits compared to strong baselines, despite using much less training data. Thus, EARL pushes the frontier of autoregressive multimodal models on image editing. We release our code, training data, and trained models at https://github.com/mair-lab/EARL.

2025-08-01

ArXiv (preprint)

AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectories

Xing Han Lu

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Karolina Stanczak

Peter Shaw

Chris Pal

Web agents enable users to perform tasks on web browsers through natural language interaction. Evaluating web agents trajectories is an impo… (see more)rtant problem, since it helps us determine whether the agent successfully completed the tasks. Rule-based methods are widely used for this purpose, but they are challenging to extend to new tasks and may not always recognize successful trajectories. We may achieve higher accuracy through human evaluation, but the process would be substantially slower and more expensive. Automatic evaluations with LLMs may avoid the challenges of designing new rules and manually annotating trajectories, enabling faster and cost-effective evaluation. However, it is unclear how effective they are at evaluating web agents. To this end, we propose AgentRewardBench, the first benchmark to assess the effectiveness of LLM judges for evaluating web agents. AgentRewardBench contains 1302 trajectories across 5 benchmarks and 4 LLMs. Each trajectory in AgentRewardBench is reviewed by an expert, who answers questions pertaining to the success, side effects, and repetitiveness of the agent. Using our benchmark, we evaluate 12 LLM judges and find that no single LLM excels across all benchmarks. We also find that the rule-based evaluation used by common benchmarks tends to underreport the success rate of web agents, highlighting a key weakness of rule-based evaluation and the need to develop more flexible automatic evaluations. We release the benchmark at: https://agent-reward-bench.github.io

2025-07-07

colmweb.org/COLM/2025/Conference (accepted)

Not All Data Are Unlearned Equally

Aravind Krishnan

Marius Mosbach

Machine unlearning is concerned with the task of removing knowledge learned from particular data points from a trained model. In the context… (see more) of large language models (LLMs), unlearning has recently received increased attention, particularly for removing knowledge about named entities from models for privacy purposes. While various approaches have been proposed to address the unlearning problem, most existing approaches treat all data points to be unlearned equally, i.e., unlearning that Montreal is a city in Canada is treated exactly the same as unlearning the phone number of the first author of this paper. In this work, we show that this all data is equal assumption does not hold for LLM unlearning. We study how the success of unlearning depends on the frequency of the knowledge we want to unlearn in the pre-training data of a model and find that frequency strongly affects unlearning, i.e., more frequent knowledge is harder to unlearn. Additionally, we uncover a misalignment between probability and generation-based evaluations of unlearning and show that this problem worsens as models become larger. Overall, our experiments highlight the need for better evaluation practices and novel methods for LLM unlearning that take the training data of models into account.

2025-07-07

colmweb.org/COLM/2025/Conference (accepted)

REARANK: Reasoning Re-ranking Agent via Reinforcement Learning

Le Zhang

Bo Wang

Xipeng Qiu

Aishwarya Agrawal

We present REARANK, a large language model (LLM)-based listwise reasoning reranking agent. REARANK explicitly reasons before reranking, sign… (see more)ificantly improving both performance and interpretability. Leveraging reinforcement learning and data augmentation, REARANK achieves substantial improvements over baseline models across popular information retrieval benchmarks, notably requiring only 179 annotated samples. Built on top of Qwen2.5-7B, our REARANK-7B demonstrates performance comparable to GPT-4 on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks and even surpasses GPT-4 on reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmarks. These results underscore the effectiveness of our approach and highlight how reinforcement learning can enhance LLM reasoning capabilities in reranking.

2025-05-01

arXiv (published)

SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents

Ada Defne Tur

Esin DURMUS

Karolina Stanczak

2025-05-01

ICML.cc/2025/Conference (poster)

VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Milad Aghajohari

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to complex reasoning tasks that require executing several complex steps before receivi… (see more)ng any reward. Properly assigning credit to these steps is essential for enhancing model performance. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a common reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm used for LLM finetuning, employs value networks to tackle credit assignment. However, recent approaches achieve strong results without it, raising questions about the efficacy of value networks in practice. In this work, we systematically evaluate the efficacy of value networks and reveal their significant shortcomings in reasoning-heavy LLM tasks, showing that they often produce poor estimate of expected return and barely outperform a random baseline when comparing alternative steps. This motivates our key question: Can improved credit assignment enhance RL training for LLMs? To address this, we propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates. Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time (up to 3.0x). Crucially, it achieves higher test accuracy for a given training accuracy, capturing more generalization signal per sample. These results emphasize the importance of accurate credit assignment in RL training of LLM.

2025-05-01

ICML.cc/2025/Conference (poster)

DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's think about LLM Reasoning

Sara Vera Marjanovi'c

Arkil Patel

Vaibhav Adlakha

Milad Aghajohari

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Gaurav Kamath

Marius Mosbach

Karolina Stanczak

2025-04-02

ArXiv (preprint)

DeepSeek-R1 Thoughtology: Let's think about LLM Reasoning

Sara Vera Marjanovi'c

Arkil Patel

Vaibhav Adlakha

Milad Aghajohari

Amirhossein Kazemnejad

Gaurav Kamath

Marius Mosbach

Karolina Stanczak

Large Reasoning Models like DeepSeek-R1 mark a fundamental shift in how LLMs approach complex problems. Instead of directly producing an ans… (see more)wer for a given input, DeepSeek-R1 creates detailed multi-step reasoning chains, seemingly"thinking"about a problem before providing an answer. This reasoning process is publicly available to the user, creating endless opportunities for studying the reasoning behaviour of the model and opening up the field of Thoughtology. Starting from a taxonomy of DeepSeek-R1's basic building blocks of reasoning, our analyses on DeepSeek-R1 investigate the impact and controllability of thought length, management of long or confusing contexts, cultural and safety concerns, and the status of DeepSeek-R1 vis-\`a-vis cognitive phenomena, such as human-like language processing and world modelling. Our findings paint a nuanced picture. Notably, we show DeepSeek-R1 has a 'sweet spot' of reasoning, where extra inference time can impair model performance. Furthermore, we find a tendency for DeepSeek-R1 to persistently ruminate on previously explored problem formulations, obstructing further exploration. We also note strong safety vulnerabilities of DeepSeek-R1 compared to its non-reasoning counterpart, which can also compromise safety-aligned LLMs.

2025-04-02

ArXiv (preprint)

Exploiting Instruction-Following Retrievers for Malicious Information Retrieval

Nicholas Meade

2025-03-11

ArXiv (preprint)

SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents

Ada Defne Tur

Esin DURMUS

Karolina Sta'nczak

2025-03-06

ArXiv (preprint)

SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents

Ada Defne Tur

Esin DURMUS

Karolina Stanczak

LLM-based agents are becoming increasingly proficient at solving web-based tasks. With this capability comes a greater risk of misuse for ma… (see more)licious purposes, such as posting misinformation in an online forum or selling illicit substances on a website. To evaluate these risks, we propose SafeArena, the first benchmark to focus on the deliberate misuse of web agents. SafeArena comprises 250 safe and 250 harmful tasks across four websites. We classify the harmful tasks into five harm categories -- misinformation, illegal activity, harassment, cybercrime, and social bias, designed to assess realistic misuses of web agents. We evaluate leading LLM-based web agents, including GPT-4o, Claude-3.5 Sonnet, Qwen-2-VL 72B, and Llama-3.2 90B, on our benchmark. To systematically assess their susceptibility to harmful tasks, we introduce the Agent Risk Assessment framework that categorizes agent behavior across four risk levels. We find agents are surprisingly compliant with malicious requests, with GPT-4o and Qwen-2 completing 34.7% and 27.3% of harmful requests, respectively. Our findings highlight the urgent need for safety alignment procedures for web agents. Our benchmark is available here: https://safearena.github.io

2025-03-06

ArXiv (preprint)

Societal Alignment Frameworks Can Improve LLM Alignment

Karolina Stanczak

Nicholas Meade

Mehar Bhatia

Hattie Zhou

Konstantin Böttinger

Jeremy Barnes

Jason Stanley

Jessica Montgomery

Richard Zemel

Nicolas Papernot

Nicolas Chapados

Denis Therien

Timothy P. Lillicrap

Ana Marasovic

Sylvie Delacroix

Gillian K. Hadfield

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values… (see more) - a process coined alignment. However, aligning LLMs remains challenging due to the inherent disconnect between the complexity of human values and the narrow nature of the technological approaches designed to address them. Current alignment methods often lead to misspecified objectives, reflecting the broader issue of incomplete contracts, the impracticality of specifying a contract between a model developer, and the model that accounts for every scenario in LLM alignment. In this paper, we argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks, including social, economic, and contractual alignment, and discuss potential solutions drawn from these domains. Given the role of uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks, we then investigate how it manifests in LLM alignment. We end our discussion by offering an alternative view on LLM alignment, framing the underspecified nature of its objectives as an opportunity rather than perfect their specification. Beyond technical improvements in LLM alignment, we discuss the need for participatory alignment interface designs.

2025-03-05

ICLR.cc/2025/Workshop/Bi-Align (poster)