Siva Reddy

Biography

Siva Reddy is an assistant professor at the School of Computer Science and in the Department of Linguistics at McGill University. He completed a postdoc with the Stanford NLP Group in September 2019.

Reddy’s research goal is to enable machines with natural language understanding abilities in order to facilitate applications like question answering and conversational systems. His expertise includes building symbolic (linguistic and induced) and deep learning models for language.

Current Students

Vaibhav Adlakha

PhD - McGill University

Parishad BehnamGhader

Master's Research - McGill University

PhD - McGill University

Collaborating researcher - University of Edinburgh

Jay Gala

Master's Research - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Collaborating researcher

Gaurav Kamath

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Timothy O'Donnell

Imene Kerboua

Collaborating researcher - INSA Lyon, France

PhD - McGill University

Principal supervisor :

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Timothy O'Donnell

Aravind Krishnan

Collaborating Alumni - UNIVERSITÄT DES SAARLANDES

Benno Krojer

PhD - McGill University

Zichao Li

PhD - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Jackie Cheung

Fengyuan Liu

Master's Research - McGill University

Co-supervisor :

Dzmitry Bahdanau

Xing Han Lu

PhD - McGill University

Master's Research - McGill University

Nicholas Meade

PhD - McGill University

Postdoctorate - McGill University

Hanseok Oh

Collaborating researcher

Arkil Patel

PhD - McGill University

Principal supervisor :

Collaborating Alumni

Karolina Ewa Stańczak

Collaborating Alumni - McGill University

Ada Tur

Research Intern - McGill University

PhD - McGill University

Collaborating Alumni - McGill University

How Do We Explain AI and Ensure the Explanation Is True? Faithfulness Measurable Models Tell You How

Blog Posts

October 1, 2024

Andrea Madsen

Siva Reddy

Sarath Chandar

Read the article

Publications

Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey

Andreas Madsen

Sarath Chandar

2022-12-23

ACM Computing Surveys (published)

Evaluating the Faithfulness of Importance Measures in NLP by Recursively Masking Allegedly Important Tokens and Retraining

Andreas Madsen

Nicholas Meade

Vaibhav Adlakha

To explain NLP models a popular approach is to use importance measures, such as attention, which inform input tokens are important for makin… (see more)g a prediction. However, an open question is how well these explanations accurately reflect a model's logic, a property called faithfulness. To answer this question, we propose Recursive ROAR, a new faithfulness metric. This works by recursively masking allegedly important tokens and then retraining the model. The principle is that this should result in worse model performance compared to masking random tokens. The result is a performance curve given a masking-ratio. Furthermore, we propose a summarizing metric using relative area-between-curves (RACU), which allows for easy comparison across papers, models, and tasks. We evaluate 4 different importance measures on 8 different datasets, using both LSTM-attention models and RoBERTa models. We find that the faithfulness of importance measures is both model-dependent and task-dependent. This conclusion contradicts previous evaluations in both computer vision and faithfulness of attention literature.

2022-12-01

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 (published)

Does Entity Abstraction Help Generative Transformers Reason?

Nicolas Gontier

Chris Pal

We study the utility of incorporating entity type abstractions into pre-trained Transformers and test these methods on four NLP tasks requir… (see more)ing different forms of logical reasoning: (1) compositional language understanding with text-based relational reasoning (CLUTRR), (2) abductive reasoning (ProofWriter), (3) multi-hop question answering (HotpotQA), and (4) conversational question answering (CoQA). We propose and empirically explore three ways to add such abstraction: (i) as additional input embeddings, (ii) as a separate sequence to encode, and (iii) as an auxiliary prediction task for the model. Overall, our analysis demonstrates that models with abstract entity knowledge performs better than without it. The best abstraction aware models achieved an overall accuracy of 88.8% and 91.8% compared to the baseline model achieving 62.9% and 89.8% on CLUTRR and ProofWriter respectively. However, for HotpotQA and CoQA, we find that F1 scores improve by only 0.5% on average. Our results suggest that the benefit of explicit abstraction is significant in formally defined logical reasoning settings requiring many reasoning hops, but point to the notion that it is less beneficial for NLP tasks having less formal logical structure.

2022-11-20

TMLR (accepted)

openreview.net

Few-shot Question Generation for Personalized Feedback in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Devang Kulshreshtha

Muhammad Shayan

Robert Belfer

Iulian V. Serban

Ekaterina Kochmar

2022-06-08

ArXiv (preprint)

Compositional Generalization in Dependency Parsing

Emily D. Goodwin

Timothy O'Donnell

Dzmitry Bahdanau

2022-05-01

Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (published)

An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Models

Nicholas Meade

Elinor Poole-Dayan

Recent work has shown pre-trained language models capture social biases from the large amounts of text they are trained on. This has attract… (see more)ed attention to developing techniques that mitigate such biases. In this work, we perform an empirical survey of five recently proposed bias mitigation techniques: Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA), Dropout, Iterative Nullspace Projection, Self-Debias, and SentenceDebias. We quantify the effectiveness of each technique using three intrinsic bias benchmarks while also measuring the impact of these techniques on a model’s language modeling ability, as well as its performance on downstream NLU tasks. We experimentally find that: (1) Self-Debias is the strongest debiasing technique, obtaining improved scores on all bias benchmarks; (2) Current debiasing techniques perform less consistently when mitigating non-gender biases; And (3) improvements on bias benchmarks such as StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs by using debiasing strategies are often accompanied by a decrease in language modeling ability, making it difficult to determine whether the bias mitigation was effective.

2022-05-01

Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (published)

Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptions

Vibhav Vineet

Edoardo Ponti

The ability to integrate context, including perceptual and temporal cues, plays a pivotal role in grounding the meaning of a linguistic utte… (see more)rance. In order to measure to what extent current vision-and-language models master this ability, we devise a new multimodal challenge, Image Retrieval from Contextual Descriptions (ImageCoDe). In particular, models are tasked with retrieving the correct image from a set of 10 minimally contrastive candidates based on a contextual description.As such, each description contains only the details that help distinguish between images.Because of this, descriptions tend to be complex in terms of syntax and discourse and require drawing pragmatic inferences. Images are sourced from both static pictures and video frames.We benchmark several state-of-the-art models, including both cross-encoders such as ViLBERT and bi-encoders such as CLIP, on ImageCoDe.Our results reveal that these models dramatically lag behind human performance: the best variant achieves an accuracy of 20.9 on video frames and 59.4 on static pictures, compared with 90.8 in humans.Furthermore, we experiment with new model variants that are better equipped to incorporate visual and temporal context into their representations, which achieve modest gains. Our hope is that ImageCoDE will foster progress in grounded language understanding by encouraging models to focus on fine-grained visual differences.

2022-05-01

Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (published)

The Power of Prompt Tuning for Low-Resource Semantic Parsing

Nathan Schucher

Harm de Vries

Prompt tuning has recently emerged as an effective method for adapting pre-trained language models to a number of language understanding and… (see more) generation tasks. In this paper, we investigate prompt tuning for semantic parsing—the task of mapping natural language utterances onto formal meaning representations. On the low-resource splits of Overnight and TOPv2, we find that a prompt tuned T5-xl significantly outperforms its fine-tuned counterpart, as well as strong GPT-3 and BART baselines. We also conduct ablation studies across different model scales and target representations, finding that, with increasing model scale, prompt tuned T5 models improve at generating target representations that are far from the pre-training distribution.

2022-05-01

Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) (published)

Using Interactive Feedback to Improve the Accuracy and Explainability of Question Answering Systems Post-Deployment

Prakhar Sharma

2022-05-01

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 (published)

On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?

Nouha Dziri

Sivan Milton

Mo Yu

Osmar R Zaiane

Knowledge-grounded conversational models are known to suffer from producing factually invalid statements, a phenomenon commonly called hallu… (see more)cination. In this work, we investigate the underlying causes of this phenomenon: is hallucination due to the training data, or to the models? We conduct a comprehensive human study on both existing knowledge-grounded conversational benchmarks and several state-of-the-art models. Our study reveals that the standard benchmarks consist of > 60% hallucinated responses, leading to models that not only hallucinate but even amplify hallucinations. Our findings raise important questions on the quality of existing datasets and models trained using them. We make our annotations publicly available for future research.

2022-04-17

ArXiv (preprint)

On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?

Nouha Dziri

Sivan Milton

Mo Yu

Osmar R Zaiane