Learn how to leverage generative AI to support and improve your productivity at work. The next cohort will take place online on April 28 and 30, 2026, in French.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Publications
Influence of scanning plane on Human Spinal Cord functional Magnetic Resonance echo planar imaging
BACKGROUND: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is based on the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent contrast and has been exploited f… (see more)or the indirect study of the neuronal activity within both the brain and the spinal cord. However, the interpretation of spinal cord fMRI (scfMRI) is still controversial and its diffusion is rather limited because of technical limitations. Overcoming these limitations would have a beneficial effect for the assessment and follow-up of spinal injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. PURPOSE: This study was aimed at systematically verify whether sagittal scanning in scfMRI using EPI readout is a viable alternative to the more common axial scanning, and at optimizing a pipeline for EPI-based scfMRI data analysis, based on Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT). METHODS: Forty-five healthy subjects underwent MRI acquisition in a Philips Achieva 3T MRI scanner. T2*-weighted fMRI data were acquired using a GE-EPI sequence along sagittal and axial planes during an isometric motor task. Differences on benchmarks were assessed via paired two-sample t-test at p=0.05. RESULTS: We investigated the impact of the acquisition strategy by means of various metrics such as Temporal Signal to Noise Ratio (tSNR), Dice Coefficient to assess geometric distortions, Reproducibility and Sensitivity. tSNR was higher in axial than in sagittal scans, as well as reproducibility within the whole cord mask (t=7.4, p0.01) and within the GM mask (t=4.2, p0.01). The other benchmarks, associated with distortion and functional response, showed no differenc
Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) is a challenging problem in object detection, where a pre-trained source model is adapted to a new targ… (see more)et domain without using any source domain data for privacy and efficiency reasons. Most state-of-the-art SFDA methods for object detection have been proposed for Faster-RCNN, a detector that is known to have high computational complexity. This paper focuses on domain adaptation techniques for real-world vision systems, particularly for the YOLO family of single-shot detectors known for their fast baselines and practical applications. Our proposed SFDA method - Source-Free YOLO (SF-YOLO) - relies on a teacher-student framework in which the student receives images with a learned, target domain-specific augmentation, allowing the model to be trained with only unlabeled target data and without requiring feature alignment. A challenge with self-training using a mean-teacher architecture in the absence of labels is the rapid decline of accuracy due to noisy or drifting pseudo-labels. To address this issue, a teacher-to-student communication mechanism is introduced to help stabilize the training and reduce the reliance on annotated target data for model selection. Despite its simplicity, our approach is competitive with state-of-the-art detectors on several challenging benchmark datasets, even sometimes outperforming methods that use source data for adaptation.
Morphology-aware policy learning is a means of enhancing policy sample efficiency by aggregating data from multiple agents. These types of p… (see more)olicies have previously been shown to help generalize over dynamic, kinematic, and limb configuration variations between agent morphologies. Unfortunately, these policies still have sub-optimal zero-shot performance compared to end-to-end finetuning on morphologies at deployment. This limitation has ramifications in practical applications such as robotics because further data collection to perform end-to-end finetuning can be computationally expensive. In this work, we investigate combining morphology-aware pretraining with \textit{parameter efficient finetuning} (PEFT) techniques to help reduce the learnable parameters necessary to specialize a morphology-aware policy to a target embodiment. We compare directly tuning sub-sets of model weights, input learnable adapters, and prefix tuning techniques for online finetuning. Our analysis reveals that PEFT techniques in conjunction with policy pre-training generally help reduce the number of samples to necessary to improve a policy compared to training models end-to-end from scratch. We further find that tuning as few as less than 1\% of total parameters will improve policy performance compared the zero-shot performance of the base pretrained a policy.
Mitigating Goal Misgeneralization via Minimax Regret
Karim Ahmed Abdel Sadek
Matthew Farrugia-Roberts
Usman Anwar
Hannah Erlebach
Christian Schroeder de Witt
David M. Krueger
Michael D Dennis
Robustness research in reinforcement learning often focuses on ensuring that the policy consistently exhibits capable, goal-driven behavior.… (see more) However, not every capable behavior is the intended behavior. *Goal misgeneralization* can occur when the policy generalizes capably with respect to a 'proxy goal' whose optimal behavior correlates with the intended goal on the training distribution, but not out of distribution. Though the intended goal would be ambiguous if they were perfectly correlated in training, we show progress can be made if the goals are only *nearly ambiguous*, with the training distribution containing a small proportion of *disambiguating* levels. We observe that the training signal from disambiguating levels could be amplified by regret-based prioritization. We formally show that approximately optimal policies on maximal-regret levels avoid the harmful effects of goal misgeneralization, which may exist without this prioritization. Empirically, we find that current regret-based Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) methods can mitigate the effects of goal misgeneralization, though do not always entirely eliminate it. Our theoretical and empirical results show that as UED methods improve they could further mitigate goal misgeneralization in practice.
Multi-task reinforcement learning (MTRL) aims to endow a single agent with the ability to perform well on multiple tasks. Recent works have … (see more)focused on developing novel sophisticated architectures to improve performance, often resulting in larger models; it is unclear, however, whether the performance gains are a consequence of the architecture design or the extra parameters. We argue that gains are mostly due to scale by demonstrating that naively scaling up a simple MTRL baseline to match parameter counts outperforms the more sophisticated architectures, and these gains benefit most from scaling the critic over the actor. Additionally, we explore the training stability advantages that come with task diversity, demonstrating that increasing the number of tasks can help mitigate plasticity loss. Our findings suggest that MTRL's simultaneous training across multiple tasks provides a natural framework for beneficial parameter scaling in reinforcement learning, challenging the need for complex architectural innovations.
Offline reinforcement learning has gained a lot of popularity for its potential to solve industry challenges. However, real-world environmen… (see more)ts are often highly stochastic and partially observable, leading long-term planners to overfit to offline data in model-based settings. Input-driven Markov Decision Processes (IDMDPs) offer a way to work with some of the uncertainty by letting designers separate what the agent has control over (states) from what it cannot (inputs) in the environnement. These stochastic external inputs are often difficult to model. Under the assumption that the input model will be imperfect, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff under shallow planning in IDMDPs. Paving the way to input-driven planning horizons, we also investigate the similarity of optimal planning horizons at different inputs given the structure of the input space.
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (see more)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.
A key approach to state abstraction is approximating behavioral metrics (notably, bisimulation metrics) in the observation space and embeddi… (see more)ng these learned distances in the representation space. While promising for robustness to task-irrelevant noise, as shown in prior work, accurately estimating these metrics remains challenging, requiring various design choices that create gaps between theory and practice. Prior evaluations focus mainly on final returns, leaving the quality of learned metrics and the source of performance gains unclear. To systematically assess how metric learning works in deep reinforcement learning (RL), we evaluate five recent approaches, unified conceptually as isometric embeddings with varying design choices. We benchmark them with baselines across 20 state-based and 14 pixel-based tasks, spanning 370 task configurations with diverse noise settings. Beyond final returns, we introduce the evaluation of a denoising factor to quantify the encoder's ability to filter distractions. To further isolate the effect of metric learning, we propose and evaluate an isolated metric estimation setting, in which the encoder is influenced solely by the metric loss. Finally, we release an open-source, modular codebase to improve reproducibility and support future research on metric learning in deep RL.
Is there a way to design powerful AI systems based on machine learning methods that would satisfy probabilistic safety guarantees? With the … (see more)long-term goal of obtaining a probabilistic guarantee that would apply in every context, we consider estimating a context-dependent bound on the probability of violating a given safety specification. Such a risk evaluation would need to be performed at run-time to provide a guardrail against dangerous actions of an AI. Noting that different plausible hypotheses about the world could produce very different outcomes, and because we do not know which one is right, we derive bounds on the safety violation probability predicted under the true but unknown hypothesis. Such bounds could be used to reject potentially dangerous actions. Our main results involve searching for cautious but plausible hypotheses, obtained by a maximization that involves Bayesian posteriors over hypotheses. We consider two forms of this result, in the iid case and in the non-iid case, and conclude with open problems towards turning such theoretical results into practical AI guardrails.
2025-05-06
Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (poster)
While deep learning (DL) has permeated, and become an integral component of many critical software systems, today software engineering resea… (see more)rch hasn't explored how to separately test data and models that are integral for DL approaches to work effectively. The main challenge in independently testing these components arises from the tight dependency between data and models. This research explores this gap, introducing our methodology of mock deep testing for unit testing of DL applications. To enable unit testing, we introduce a design paradigm that decomposes the workflow into distinct, manageable components, minimizes sequential dependencies, and modularizes key stages of the DL. For unit testing these components, we propose modeling their dependencies using mocks. This modular approach facilitates independent development and testing of the components, ensuring comprehensive quality assurance throughout the development process. We have developed KUnit, a framework for enabling mock deep testing for the Keras library. We empirically evaluated KUnit to determine the effectiveness of mocks. Our assessment of 50 DL programs obtained from Stack Overflow and GitHub shows that mocks effectively identified 10 issues in the data preparation stage and 53 issues in the model design stage. We also conducted a user study with 36 participants using KUnit to perceive the effectiveness of our approach. Participants using KUnit successfully resolved 25 issues in the data preparation stage and 38 issues in the model design stage. Our findings highlight that mock objects provide a lightweight emulation of the dependencies for unit testing, facilitating early bug detection. Lastly, to evaluate the usability of KUnit, we conducted a post-study survey. The results reveal that KUnit is helpful to DL application developers, enabling them to independently test each component effectively in different stages.
2025-05-05
2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (published)