Critical dynamics in spontaneous EEG predict anesthetic-induced loss of consciousness and perturbational complexity
Charlotte Maschke
Jordan O’Byrne
Michele Angelo Colombo
Melanie Boly
Olivia Gosseries
Steven Laureys
Mario Rosanova
Stefanie Blain-Moraes
Learning Hybrid Interpretable Models: Theory, Taxonomy, and Methods
Julien Ferry
gabriel laberge
A hybrid model involves the cooperation of an interpretable model and a complex black box. At inference, any input of the hybrid model is as… (see more)signed to either its interpretable or complex component based on a gating mechanism. The advantages of such models over classical ones are two-fold: 1) They grant users precise control over the level of transparency of the system and 2) They can potentially perform better than a standalone black box since redirecting some of the inputs to an interpretable model implicitly acts as regularization. Still, despite their high potential, hybrid models remain under-studied in the interpretability/explainability literature. In this paper, we remedy this fact by presenting a thorough investigation of such models from three perspectives: Theory, Taxonomy, and Methods. First, we explore the theory behind the generalization of hybrid models from the Probably-Approximately-Correct (PAC) perspective. A consequence of our PAC guarantee is the existence of a sweet spot for the optimal transparency of the system. When such a sweet spot is attained, a hybrid model can potentially perform better than a standalone black box. Secondly, we provide a general taxonomy for the different ways of training hybrid models: the Post-Black-Box and Pre-Black-Box paradigms. These approaches differ in the order in which the interpretable and complex components are trained. We show where the state-of-the-art hybrid models Hybrid-Rule-Set and Companion-Rule-List fall in this taxonomy. Thirdly, we implement the two paradigms in a single method: HybridCORELS, which extends the CORELS algorithm to hybrid modeling. By leveraging CORELS, HybridCORELS provides a certificate of optimality of its interpretable component and precise control over transparency. We finally show empirically that HybridCORELS is competitive with existing hybrid models, and performs just as well as a standalone black box (or even better) while being partly transparent.
The effect of gestational age on short- and long-term complications following primary esophageal atresia repair
Mathias Johansen
Samuel Wasserman
Jean Martin Laberge
Sam J. Daniel
Thomas Engelhardt
Are self-explanations from Large Language Models faithful?
Andreas Madsen
Enhancing Changepoint Detection: Penalty Learning through Deep Learning Techniques
Tung L. Nguyen
Enhancing Changepoint Detection: Penalty Learning through Deep Learning Techniques
Tung L. Nguyen
Changepoint detection, a technique for identifying significant shifts within data sequences, is crucial in various fields such as finance, g… (see more)enomics, medicine, etc. Dynamic programming changepoint detection algorithms are employed to identify the locations of changepoints within a sequence, which rely on a penalty parameter to regulate the number of changepoints. To estimate this penalty parameter, previous work uses simple models such as linear or tree-based models. This study introduces a novel deep learning method for predicting penalty parameters, leading to demonstrably improved changepoint detection accuracy on large benchmark supervised labeled datasets compared to previous methods.
From Representational Harms to Quality-of-Service Harms: A Case Study on Llama 2 Safety Safeguards
Khaoula Chehbouni
Megha Roshan
Emmanuel Ma
Futian Andrew Wei
Afaf Taïk
Investigating Failures to Generalize for Coreference Resolution Models
Ian Porada
Kaheer Suleman
Adam Trischler
Coreference resolution models are often evaluated on multiple datasets. Datasets vary, however, in how coreference is realized -- i.e., how … (see more)the theoretical concept of coreference is operationalized in the dataset -- due to factors such as the choice of corpora and annotation guidelines. We investigate the extent to which errors of current coreference resolution models are associated with existing differences in operationalization across datasets (OntoNotes, PreCo, and Winogrande). Specifically, we distinguish between and break down model performance into categories corresponding to several types of coreference, including coreferring generic mentions, compound modifiers, and copula predicates, among others. This break down helps us investigate how state-of-the-art models might vary in their ability to generalize across different coreference types. In our experiments, for example, models trained on OntoNotes perform poorly on generic mentions and copula predicates in PreCo. Our findings help calibrate expectations of current coreference resolution models; and, future work can explicitly account for those types of coreference that are empirically associated with poor generalization when developing models.
Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning: A Practical Guide
Alessio Mora
Irene Tenison
Paolo Bellavista
A Literature Review on Detecting, Verifying, and Mitigating Online Misinformation
Arezo Bodaghi
Ketra A. Schmitt
Pierre Watine
Social media use has transformed communication and made social interaction more accessible. Public microblogs allow people to share and acce… (see more)ss news through existing and social-media-created social connections and access to public news sources. These benefits also create opportunities for the spread of false information. False information online can mislead people, decrease the benefits derived from social media, and reduce trust in genuine news. We divide false information into two categories: unintentional false information, also known as misinformation; and intentionally false information, also known as disinformation and fake news. Given the increasing prevalence of misinformation, it is imperative to address its dissemination on social media platforms. This survey focuses on six key aspects related to misinformation: 1) clarify the definition of misinformation to differentiate it from intentional forms of false information; 2) categorize proposed approaches to manage misinformation into three types: detection, verification, and mitigation; 3) review the platforms and languages for which these techniques have been proposed and tested; 4) describe the specific features that are considered in each category; 5) compare public datasets created to address misinformation and categorize into prelabeled content-only datasets and those including users and their connections; and 6) survey fact-checking websites that can be used to verify the accuracy of information. This survey offers a comprehensive and unprecedented review of misinformation, integrating various methodological approaches, datasets, and content-, user-, and network-based approaches, which will undoubtedly benefit future research in this field.
A Look at Value-Based Decision-Time vs. Background Planning Methods Across Different Settings
Safa Alver
In model-based reinforcement learning (RL), an agent can leverage a learned model to improve its way of behaving in different ways. Two of t… (see more)he prevalent ways to do this are through decision-time and background planning methods. In this study, we are interested in understanding how the value-based versions of these two planning methods will compare against each other across different settings. Towards this goal, we first consider the simplest instantiations of value-based decision-time and background planning methods and provide theoretical results on which one will perform better in the regular RL and transfer learning settings. Then, we consider the modern instantiations of them and provide hypotheses on which one will perform better in the same settings. Finally, we perform illustrative experiments to validate these theoretical results and hypotheses. Overall, our findings suggest that even though value-based versions of the two planning methods perform on par in their simplest instantiations, the modern instantiations of value-based decision-time planning methods can perform on par or better than the modern instantiations of value-based background planning methods in both the regular RL and transfer learning settings.
Multi Teacher Privileged Knowledge Distillation for Multimodal Expression Recognition
Muhammad Haseeb Aslam
Alessandro Lameiras Koerich
Eric Granger
Human emotion is a complex phenomenon conveyed and perceived through facial expressions, vocal tones, body language, and physiological signa… (see more)ls. Multimodal emotion recognition systems can perform well because they can learn complementary and redundant semantic information from diverse sensors. In real-world scenarios, only a subset of the modalities employed for training may be available at test time. Learning privileged information allows a model to exploit data from additional modalities that are only available during training. SOTA methods for PKD have been proposed to distill information from a teacher model (with privileged modalities) to a student model (without privileged modalities). However, such PKD methods utilize point-to-point matching and do not explicitly capture the relational information. Recently, methods have been proposed to distill the structural information. However, PKD methods based on structural similarity are primarily confined to learning from a single joint teacher representation, which limits their robustness, accuracy, and ability to learn from diverse multimodal sources. In this paper, a multi-teacher PKD (MT-PKDOT) method with self-distillation is introduced to align diverse teacher representations before distilling them to the student. MT-PKDOT employs a structural similarity KD mechanism based on a regularized optimal transport (OT) for distillation. The proposed MT-PKDOT method was validated on the Affwild2 and Biovid datasets. Results indicate that our proposed method can outperform SOTA PKD methods. It improves the visual-only baseline on Biovid data by 5.5%. On the Affwild2 dataset, the proposed method improves 3% and 5% over the visual-only baseline for valence and arousal respectively. Allowing the student to learn from multiple diverse sources is shown to increase the accuracy and implicitly avoids negative transfer to the student model.