Portrait of Maria Cutumisu

Maria Cutumisu

Affiliate Member
Associate Professor, McGill University
Research Topics
AI and Healthcare
AI Ethics
AI in Health
Applied Machine Learning
Cognition
Data Mining
Data Science
Deep Learning
Deep Neural Networks
Generative Models
Human-AI interaction
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
Large Language Models (LLM)
Learning
Machine Learning Theory
Memory
Multi-Agent Systems
Natural Language Processing
Reinforcement Learning

Biography

Maria Cutumisu is an associate professor in Learning Sciences at the Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, Faculty of Education, McGill University. She is also an Adjunct Professor at the University of Alberta in both the Department of Computing Science and the Faculty of Education. Previously, she was a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, at the University of Alberta, where she established her lab in 2015 in the area of Measurement, Evaluation, and Data Science affiliated with the Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation (CRAME).

She graduated with an M.Sc. and a Ph.D. in Computing Science from the Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta and she trained as a postdoctoral scholar in Learning Sciences at the Stanford Graduate School of Education's AAA Lab. Her research draws on computing science and educational psychology and has been funded by tri-council grants and scholarships as a principal investigator (NSERC DGs, NSERC CGS-D, SSHRC IG, and SSHRC IDGs) and as a co-principal investigator (SSHRC IGs, SSHRC IDG, SSHRC PDG, NSERC CREATE, and CIHR). In 2025, she was included on the Elsevier and Stanford University list of the world's top 2% scientists based on citations from 2024.

Her research interests include feedback processing and memory (SSHRC IDGs), machine learning and educational data mining for automated feedback generation (NSERC DGs), game-based assessments that support learning and performance-based learning (SSHRC IGs), computational thinking and data literacy (CanCode Callysto grants, CCTt tests, and SSHRC IG), AI in games (reinforcement learning in computer role-playing games) and non-player character (NPC) behaviours (NSERC CGS-D), and serious games (the RETAIN game for neonatal resuscitation; FRQS). She employs learning analytics to investigate the impact of K-16 student choices (e.g., willingness to seek critical feedback and to revise) and mindset on learning outcomes in an online game-based assessment to understand how prepared students are to learn and innovate. She uses psychophysiological technology (eye-tracking and electrodermal activity wearables) to provide a comprehensive understanding of student learning and memory processes (SSHRC IDG, Killam).

Publications

Examining the relationship between secondary students’ ICT engagement and computational thinking achievement: Does gender make a difference?
Echo Zexuan Pan
Matthew D. Johnson
Evaluating the Pedagogical Quality of LLM-Generated Feedback: A Criterion-Based and Comparative Study
Harvey Ngoe Kolle
Carrie Demmans Epp
Amna Liaqat
Fairer or Just Broken? Differential Privacy in Student Withdrawal Prediction
Carrie Demmans Epp
Nidhi Hegde
Harvey Ngoe Kolle
A deep learning approach to cognitive diagnostic modeling: Dvae CDM
Yajie Song
Qi Guo
Ying De Cui
Jacqueline P. Leighton
Implementing a Domain-Adapted GPT Model to Support Genetic Counseling in a Genodermatology Clinic
Megha Udupa
Lorena Alexandra Mija
Ethan Bendayan
Ahmad Alamari
Maxine Joly-Chevrier
Josianne Leblanc
J.-C. Tardif
Elvis Martinez-Jaramillo
Hacene Nedjar
Elham Rahme
William Foulkes
Tania Cruz Marino
Elena Netchiporouk
A systematic review of human-LLM interactions in computational thinking empirical studies
Seasonal Peaks and Climatic Predictors of Chronic Urticaria: A Global Google Trends Analysis
Katya Peri
Connor Prosty
Han Zhang Huang
Catherine Silotch
Gazal Javed
Maxine Joly-Chevrier
Moshe Ben-Shoshan
Elham Rahme
Ivan V Litvinov
Qiuyan Yu
Elena Netchiporouk
Assessing Computational Thinking Skills in K–12 Education: A Systematic Review
Yimei Zhang
Yajie Song
Profiling Pre-service Teachers’ Computational Thinking
Tanya Chichekian
Annie Savard
Yi-Mei Zhang
Computational thinking (CT) is a vital skill set for pre-service teachers who will need to foster computational literacy in K–12 classroom… (see more)s, yet the factors influencing their CT skills remain less understood than those for K–12 students or in-service teachers. This study leverages multimodal data to investigate how pre-service teachers (n=128) differ in CT skills, the predictive role of metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience, and variations in online behaviours. Using latent profile analysis, we identified three profiles based on digital literacy, problem-solving, and coding comfort (Novice, Developing, and Proficient), revealing heterogeneity in CT, and supporting non-linear skill acquisition. Linear discriminant analysis revealed that metacognitive strategies and prior coding experience significantly predict profile membership, validating the interplay of technical and cognitive factors in the development of CT skills. Behavioural data from an interactive problem-solving task showed that, compared to Novices and Developing learners, Proficient learners were more task efficient and perceived fewer challenges during task completion. Implications for designing a learning analytics dashboard to visualize profiles and behavioural metrics to support adaptive, equitable, and personalized teacher training are discussed, thereby enhancing pre-service teachers’ readiness to integrate CT into K–12 education.
<b>A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation in Education</b><b></b>
Yajie Song
Yimei Zhang
Feedback that is individualized and immediate is essential to improving learning outcomes but providing it to every learner is difficult. Au… (see more)tomatic feedback generation (AFG) aims to alleviate this problem, especially with technology-enhanced learning environments. This systematic literature review of AFG in education, following the PRISMA framework, examines 34 peer-reviewed publications. The findings revealed that the reviewed studies (1) gained momentum after 2019; (2) often used secondary cognitive data to evaluate AFG approaches; (3) mainly targeted computer science domain; (4) frequently combined multiple methods to generate feedback; (5) employed multiple performance evaluations; and (6) mostly provided written feedback aimed at correcting student errors. This review also highlighted several gaps, including the lack of (1) in-depth cognitive and affective data from user studies to evaluate feedback and understand how students interpret it; (2) research on feedback use and strategies to close feedback loop; (3) AFG systems for ill-defined domains with strong transferability; (4) elaborated feedback that scaffolds problem-solving rather than giving answers; (5) feedback using multiple modalities and valences; and (6) integration of learning theories in AFG design. This review advances understanding of current AFG practices, evaluates and extends conceptual frameworks of AFG, and provides insights for future AFG design and evaluation.
Using an eye tracker to capture reading skills as measured by a digital adaptation of TOWRE-2
Krystle-Lee Turgeon
Large Language Model Applications in the Algebra Domain: A Systematic Review