Portrait of Alex Lamb is unavailable

Alex Lamb

Alumni

Publications

Fortified Networks: Improving the Robustness of Deep Networks by Modeling the Manifold of Hidden Representations
Deep networks have achieved impressive results across a variety of important tasks. However a known weakness is a failure to perform well wh… (see more)en evaluated on data which differ from the training distribution, even if these differences are very small, as is the case with adversarial examples. We propose Fortified Networks, a simple transformation of existing networks, which fortifies the hidden layers in a deep network by identifying when the hidden states are off of the data manifold, and maps these hidden states back to parts of the data manifold where the network performs well. Our principal contribution is to show that fortifying these hidden states improves the robustness of deep networks and our experiments (i) demonstrate improved robustness to standard adversarial attacks in both black-box and white-box threat models; (ii) suggest that our improvements are not primarily due to the gradient masking problem and (iii) show the advantage of doing this fortification in the hidden layers instead of the input space.
Learning Generative Models with Locally Disentangled Latent Factors
Actual: Actor-Critic Under Adversarial Learning
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a powerful framework for deep generative modeling. Posed as a two-player minimax problem, GANs ar… (see more)e typically trained end-to-end on real-valued data and can be used to train a generator of high-dimensional and realistic images. However, a major limitation of GANs is that training relies on passing gradients from the discriminator through the generator via back-propagation. This makes it fundamentally difficult to train GANs with discrete data, as generation in this case typically involves a non-differentiable function. These difficulties extend to the reinforcement learning setting when the action space is composed of discrete decisions. We address these issues by reframing the GAN framework so that the generator is no longer trained using gradients through the discriminator, but is instead trained using a learned critic in the actor-critic framework with a Temporal Difference (TD) objective. This is a natural fit for sequence modeling and we use it to achieve improvements on language modeling tasks over the standard Teacher-Forcing methods.
Adversarially Learned Inference
We introduce the adversarially learned inference (ALI) model, which jointly learns a generation network and an inference network using an ad… (see more)versarial process. The generation network maps samples from stochastic latent variables to the data space while the inference network maps training examples in data space to the space of latent variables. An adversarial game is cast between these two networks and a discriminative network is trained to distinguish between joint latent/data-space samples from the generative network and joint samples from the inference network. We illustrate the ability of the model to learn mutually coherent inference and generation networks through the inspections of model samples and reconstructions and confirm the usefulness of the learned representations by obtaining a performance competitive with state-of-the-art on the semi-supervised SVHN and CIFAR10 tasks.
GibbsNet: Iterative Adversarial Inference for Deep Graphical Models
Directed latent variable models that formulate the joint distribution as …
Variance Reduction in SGD by Distributed Importance Sampling
Humans are able to accelerate their learning by selecting training materials that are the most informative and at the appropriate level of d… (see more)ifficulty. We propose a framework for distributing deep learning in which one set of workers search for the most informative examples in parallel while a single worker updates the model on examples selected by importance sampling. This leads the model to update using an unbiased estimate of the gradient which also has minimum variance when the sampling proposal is proportional to the L2-norm of the gradient. We show experimentally that this method reduces gradient variance even in a context where the cost of synchronization across machines cannot be ignored, and where the factors for importance sampling are not updated instantly across the training set.
Discriminative Regularization for Generative Models
We explore the question of whether the representations learned by classifiers can be used to enhance the quality of generative models. Our c… (see more)onjecture is that labels correspond to characteristics of natural data which are most salient to humans: identity in faces, objects in images, and utterances in speech. We propose to take advantage of this by using the representations from discriminative classifiers to augment the objective function corresponding to a generative model. In particular we enhance the objective function of the variational autoencoder, a popular generative model, with a discriminative regularization term. We show that enhancing the objective function in this way leads to samples that are clearer and have higher visual quality than the samples from the standard variational autoencoders.
Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networks
The Teacher Forcing algorithm trains recurrent networks by supplying observed sequence values as inputs during training and using the networ… (see more)k’s own one-step-ahead predictions to do multi-step sampling. We introduce the Professor Forcing algorithm, which uses adversarial domain adaptation to encourage the dynamics of the recurrent network to be the same when training the network and when sampling from the network over multiple time steps. We apply Professor Forcing to language modeling, vocal synthesis on raw waveforms, handwriting generation, and image generation. Empirically we find that Professor Forcing acts as a regularizer, improving test likelihood on character level Penn Treebank and sequential MNIST. We also find that the model qualitatively improves samples, especially when sampling for a large number of time steps. This is supported by human evaluation of sample quality. Trade-offs between Professor Forcing and Scheduled Sampling are discussed. We produce T-SNEs showing that Professor Forcing successfully makes the dynamics of the network during training and sampling more similar.
Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions
Rami Al-Rfou
Amjad Almahairi
Christof Angermueller
Frédéric Bastien
Justin Bayer
Anatoly Belikov
Alexander Belopolsky
Josh Bleecher Snyder
Pierre-Luc Carrier
Paul Christiano
Myriam Côté
Yann N. Dauphin
Julien Demouth
Sander Dieleman
Ziye Fan
Mathieu Germain
Matt Graham
Balázs Hidasi
Arjun Jain
Kai Jia
Mikhail Korobov
Vivek Kulkarni
Pascal Lamblin
Eric Larsen
Sean Lee
Simon Lefrancois
Jesse A. Livezey
Cory Lorenz
Jeremiah Lowin
Qianli Ma
Robert T. McGibbon
Mehdi Mirza
Alberto Orlandi
Christopher Pal
Colin Raffel
Daniel Renshaw
Matthew Rocklin
Adriana Romero
Markus Roth
Peter Sadowski
John Salvatier
Jan Schlüter
John Schulman
Gabriel Schwartz
Iulian Vlad Serban
Samira Shabanian
Sigurd Spieckermann
S. Ramana Subramanyam
Gijs van Tulder
Sebastian Urban
Dustin J. Webb
Matthew Willson
Lijun Xue
Theano is a Python library that allows to define, optimize, and evaluate mathematical expressions involving multi-dimensional arrays efficie… (see more)ntly. Since its introduction, it has been one of the most used CPU and GPU mathematical compilers - especially in the machine learning community - and has shown steady performance improvements. Theano is being actively and continuously developed since 2008, multiple frameworks have been built on top of it and it has been used to produce many state-of-the-art machine learning models. The present article is structured as follows. Section I provides an overview of the Theano software and its community. Section II presents the principal features of Theano and how to use them, and compares them with other similar projects. Section III focuses on recently-introduced functionalities and improvements. Section IV compares the performance of Theano against Torch7 and TensorFlow on several machine learning models. Section V discusses current limitations of Theano and potential ways of improving it.