Portrait of Catherine Régis

Catherine Régis

Associate Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal
Research Topics
Deep Learning
Online Learning

Biography

Catherine Régis is Full Professor at the Faculty of Law of Université de Montréal (UdeM), Co-director of the Canadian AI Safety Institute research program and Director of Social Innovation and International Policy at IVADO. In addition to holding a Canada CIFAR Chair in AI and Human Rights and an International Chair on Science Diplomacy and the Global Governance of AI, she is a Senior Research Associate at the Intellectual Forum of the University of Cambridge. From 2021 to 2023, she was UdeM’s Associate VP for Strategic Planning and Responsible Digital Innovation.

Prof Régis is very active on the international scene. In 2022, she was appointed Cochair of the Working Group on Responsible AI of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), which comprises 29 member states (including Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan and the USA) for a period of two years. From 2020 to 2024, she led the Working Group on Responsible Digital Innovation and AI of the U7+ Alliance, which includes more than 50 universities from around the world. In 2022, she was a selected Fellow for the UN’s Institute for Training and Research’s program (UNITAR) in Science Diplomacy and, in 2024, she became part of the Technical Committee for UNESCO’s AI and the Rule of Law Program.

Prof Régis is used to executing consulting or training assignments both in Canada and elsewhere. She has been a visiting professor in different countries, and she has presented her work at institutions such as the OECD, the World Health Organization, UNESCO, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Aspen Ministers Forum; in more than 20 universities worldwide (e.g., Cambridge, Costa Rica, Edinburgh, Georgetown, Osaka, Oxford, Sciences Po Paris, Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris 1, Toronto); and in high-level conferences, including the AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park in 2023. She is involved in the development of Science Diplomacy (which aims at building leadership and communication skills to bridge science and diplomacy in policymaking) at the national and international levels. She also guides governments, diplomats, public organizations and international organizations (e.g., academic health centres, ombudspeople and ministries of health or innovation, UNESCO, WHO, UN) on policy orientation and responsible AI projects.

Most of her work explores how to best regulate AI at the national and international levels and to build responsible AI governance approaches more broadly. Her main objectives are:

1) to ensure human rights considerations are integrated throughout the AI life cycle;

2) to help policymakers map out and implement normative strategies that will contribute to the equitable distribution of AI benefits across nations; and

3) to inform the creation of the regulatory and governance tools needed for the responsible design and deployment of AI in key systems like healthcare and justice.

Current Students

Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - McGill University
Principal supervisor :
Independent visiting researcher - Umeå University

Publications

An exploratory cross-sectional study of the effects of ongoing relationships with accompanying patients on cancer care experience, self-efficacy, and psychological distress
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Monica Iliescu Nelea
Louise Normandin
Cécile Vialaron
Karine Bouchard
Marie-Andrée Côté
Maria Alejandra Rodriguez Duarte
Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri
Israël Fortin
Danielle Charpentier
Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
Nicolas Fernandez
Antoine Boivin
Michel Dorval
Mado Desforges
Isabelle Ganache
Lynda Bélanger
Zeev Rosberger
Michel Alain Danino … (see 3 more)
Jean-François Pelletier
Thi Trinh Thuc Vu
Michèle de Guise
Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal in Canada introduced accompanying patients (APs) into the breast cancer care trajectory. … (see more)APs are patients who have been treated for breast cancer and have been integrated into the clinical team to expand the services offered to people affected by cancer. This study describes the profiles of the people who received the support and explores whether one-offs vs ongoing encounters with APs influence their experience of care, on self-efficacy in coping with cancer, and on their level of psychological distress. An exploratory cross-sectional study was carried out among patients to compare patients who had one encounter with an AP (G1) with those who had had several encounters (G2). Five questionnaires were administered on socio-demographic characteristics, care pathway, evaluation of the support experience, self-efficacy in coping with cancer, and level of psychological distress. Logbooks, completed by the APs, determined the number of encounters. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between the number of encounters, patient characteristics, care pathway, number of topics discussed, self-efficacy measures in coping with cancer, and level of psychological distress. Between April 2020 and December 2021, 60% of 535 patients who were offered support from an AP accepted. Of these, one hundred and twenty-four patients participated in the study. The study aimed to recruit a minimum of 70 patients with the expectation of obtaining at least 50 participants, assuming a response rate of 70%. There were no differences between G1 and G2 in terms of sociodemographic data and care pathways. Statistical differences were found between G1 and G2 for impacts on and the return to daily life (p = 0.000), the return to the work and impacts on professional life (p = 0.044), announcement of a diagnosis to family and friends (p = 0.033), and strategies for living with treatment under the best conditions (p = 0.000). Significant differences were found on the topics of cancer (p = 0.000), genetic testing (p = 0.023), therapeutic options (p = 0.000), fatigue following treatment (p = 0.005), pain and discomfort after treatment or surgery (p = 0.000), potential emotions and their management (p = 0.000) and the decision-making processes (p = 0.011). A significant relationship was found between the two groups for patients’ ability to cope with cancer (p = 0.038), and their level of psychological distress at different stages of the care pathway (p = 0.024). This study shows differences between one-time and ongoing support for cancer patients. It highlights the potential for APs to help patients develop self-efficacy and cope with the challenges of cancer treatment.
Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects
Marie‐Pascale Pomey
Jesseca Paquette
Monica Iliescu‐Nelea
Cécile Vialaron
Rim Mourad
Karine Bouchard
Louise Normandin
Marie‐Andrée Côté
Mado Desforges
Pénélope Pomey‐Carpentier
Israël Fortin
Isabelle Ganache
Zeev Rosberger
Danielle Charpentier
Lynda Bélanger
Michel Dorval
Djahanchah P. Ghadiri
Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay
Antoine Boivin … (see 4 more)
Jean‐François Pelletier
Nicolas Fernandez
Alain M. Danino
Michèle de Guise
Two patient–researchers have contributed to the study design, the conduct of the study, the data analysis and interpretation, as well as i… (see more)n the preparation and writing of this manuscript.
Public Perspectives on Exposure Notification Apps: A Patient and Citizen Co-Designed Study
Esli Osmanlliu
Jesseca Paquette
Maria Alejandra Rodriguez Duarte
Sylvain Bédard
Nathalie de Marcellis-Warin
Majlinda Zhegu
Marie-Eve Bouthillier
Annie-Danielle Grenier
Paul Lewis
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Canada deployed a digital exposure notification app (COVID Alert) as a strategy to support manual contact tracing. Our aims are to (1) asses… (see more)s the use, knowledge, and concerns of the COVID Alert app, (2) identify predictors of app downloads, and (3) develop strategies to promote social acceptability. A 36-item questionnaire was co-designed by 12 citizens and patients partnered with 16 academic researchers and was distributed in the province of Québec, Canada, from May 27 to 28 June 2021. Of 959 respondents, 43% had downloaded the app. Messaging from government sources constituted the largest influence on app download. Infrequent social contacts and perceived app inefficacy were the main reasons not to download the app. Cybersecurity, data confidentiality, loss of privacy, and geolocation were the most frequent concerns. Nearly half of the respondents inaccurately believed that the app used geolocation. Most respondents supported citizen involvement in app development. The identified predictors for app uptake included nine characteristics. In conclusion, this project highlights four key themes on how to promote the social acceptability of such tools: (1) improved communication and explanation of key app characteristics, (2) design features that incentivize adoption, (3) inclusive socio-technical features, and (4) upstream public partnership in development and deployment.
Enjeux éthiques de l’IA en santé - Fiche 4
Joé T. Martineau
Frédérique Romy Godin
Janine Badr
Alexandre Castonguay
Martin Cousineau
Philippe Després
Aude Motulsky
Jean Noel Nikiema
Cecile Petitgand
La présente fiche propose une revue des différents enjeux éthiques liés au développement et à l’utilisation des technologies d’int… (see more)elligence artificielle dans le milieu de la santé, en trois parties. D’abord, nous aborderons les enjeux éthiques liés à l’exploitation de données massives nécessaires à l’entrainement des algorithmes de l’IA. Ensuite, nous présenterons les principaux enjeux éthiques liés au développement et à l’utilisation des SIA en santé, en abordant la façon dont ces systèmes impactent nos vies ainsi que l’environnement physique et social dans lequel nous vivons. Nous présenterons finalement les principales initiatives nationales et internationales en matière d’éthique de l’IA et de la gestion des données, fruits et reflets d’une réflexion globale sur ces sujets. Ces initiatives ont notamment proposé des lignes directrices et principes normatifs servant de guides pour le développement de technologies de l’IA éthiques et responsables Il s'agit de la quatrième fiche d'une série de 4 développée dans le cadre d'un mandat réalisé pour le Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec (MSSS).
Medical Doctors in Health Reforms
Jean-Louis Denis
Sabrina Germain
Gianluca Veronesi
Health and legal experts from England and Canada consider the influence of medical doctors on reforms in this comparative study. With reflec… (see more)tions on participation since the inception of publicly funded healthcare systems, they show how the status of doctors affects change.
Assessing the Quality of Direct-to-Consumer Teleconsultation Services in Canada
Jean Noel Nikiema
Eleah Stringer
Marie-Pierre Moreault
Priscille Pana
Marco Laverdiere
Jean-Louis Denis
Béatrice Godard
Mylaine Breton
Guy Paré
Aviv Shachak
Claudia Lai
Elizabeth M. Borycki
Andre W. Kushniruk
Aude Motulsky
The objective of this study was to describe and assess the quality of the direct-to-consumer medical teleconsultation landscape in three Can… (see more)adian provinces. An environmental scan of primary care teleconsultation platforms was conducted in January 2022 to identify medical teleconsultation platforms in Quebec (Qc), Ontario, and British Columbia (BC). The quality of each teleconsultation platform was assessed using a modified version of the HONcode principles. Nineteen different direct-to-consumer medical teleconsultation platforms were identified across the three provinces. The quality of these teleconsultation platforms was very heterogeneous. The landscape of virtual primary care is changing rapidly in the Canadian ecosystem, and the transparency of current teleconsultation platforms could be improved.
Interprofessional collaboration and health policy: results from a Quebec mixed method legal research
Marie-Andree Girard
Jean-Louis Denis
Analyzing the Contribution of Ethical Charters to Building the Future of Artificial Intelligence Governance
Lyse Langlois
Enjeux juridiques propres au modèle émergent des patients accompagnateurs dans les milieux de soins au Québec (Legal Issues Arising from the Emerging Model of Accompanying Patients in the Quebec Healthcare System)
Léa Boutrouille
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Recommandations pratiques pour une utilisation responsable de l’intelligence artificielle en santé mentale en contexte de pandémie
Carl-Maria Mörch
Pascale Lehoux
La pandémie actuelle a provoqué une onde de choc dont les conséquences se font sentir dans tous les aspects de notre vie. Alors que la sa… (see more)nté physique a été généralement au cœur de l’attention scientifique et politique, il est devenu clair que la pandémie de COVID-19 a influé significativement sur la santé mentale de nombreux individus. Plus encore, elle aurait accentué les fragilités déjà existantes dans nos systèmes de santé mentale. Souvent moins financé ou soutenu que la santé physique, le domaine de la santé mentale pourrait-il bénéficier d’innovations en intelligence artificielle en période de pandémie ? Et si oui comment ? Que vous soyez développeur.e.s en IA, chercheur.e.s ou entrepreneur.e.s, ce document vise à vous fournir une synthèse des pistes d’actions et des ressources pour prévenir les principaux risques éthiques liés au développement d’applications d’IA dans le champ de la santé mentale. Pour illustrer ces principes, ce document propose de découvrir quatre cas fictif, à visée réaliste, à partir desquels il vous sera proposé de porter attention aux enjeux éthiques potentiels dans cette situation, aux enjeux d’innovation responsable à envisager, aux pistes d’action possibles inspirées de la liste de contrôle (Protocole Canadien conçu pour favoriser une utilisation responsable de l’IA en santé mentale et prévention du suicide, Mörch et al., 2020), aux ressources pratiques et à certains enjeux juridiques pertinents. Ce document a été élaboré par Carl-Maria Mörch, PhD, Algora Lab, Université de Montréal, Observatoire International sur les impacts sociétaux de l’Intelligence Artificielle et du Numérique (OBVIA), Mila – Institut Québécois d’Intelligence Artificielle, avec les contributions de Pascale Lehoux, Marc-Antoine Dilhac, Catherine Régis et Xavier Dionne.
Veille sur les outils numériques en santé dans le contexte de COVID-19
Aude Motulsky
Philippe Després
Cecile Petitgand
Jean Noel Nikiema
Jean-Louis Denis
Cybersanté : les tentatives juridiques pour objectiver un domaine en pleine effervescence
Vincent Gautrais