Portrait of Catherine Régis

Catherine Régis

Associate Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal
Research Topics
Deep Learning
Online Learning

Biography

Catherine Régis is Full Professor at the Faculty of Law of Université de Montréal (UdeM), Co-director of the Canadian AI Safety Institute research program and Director of Social Innovation and International Policy at IVADO. In addition to holding a Canada CIFAR Chair in AI and Human Rights and a Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy, she is a Senior Research Associate at the Intellectual Forum of the University of Cambridge. From 2021 to 2023, she was UdeM’s Associate VP for Strategic Planning and Responsible Digital Innovation.

Prof Régis is very active on the international scene. In 2022, she was appointed Cochair of the Working Group on Responsible AI of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), which comprises 29 member states (including Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan and the USA) for a period of two years. From 2020 to 2024, she led the Working Group on Responsible Digital Innovation and AI of the U7+ Alliance, which includes more than 50 universities from around the world. In 2022, she was a selected Fellow for the UN’s Institute for Training and Research’s program (UNITAR) in Science Diplomacy and, in 2024, she became part of the Technical Committee for UNESCO’s AI and the Rule of Law Program.

Prof Régis is used to executing consulting or training assignments both in Canada and elsewhere. She has been a visiting professor in different countries, and she has presented her work at institutions such as the OECD, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Alan Turing Institute, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Aspen Ministers Forum; in more than 20 universities worldwide (e.g., Cambridge, Costa Rica, Edinburgh, Georgetown, Osaka, Oxford, Sciences Po Paris, Sorbonne, Toronto); and in high-level conferences, including the AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park in 2023 and NeurIPS. She is involved in the development of Science Diplomacy (which aims at building leadership and communication skills to bridge science and diplomacy in policymaking) at the national and international levels. She also guides governments, public organizations and international organizations (e.g., academic health centres, ombudspeople and ministries of health or innovation, UNESCO, WHO, UN) on policy orientation and responsible AI projects. 

Most of her work explores how to best regulate AI at the national and international levels and to build responsible AI governance approaches more broadly. Her main objectives are: 1) to ensure human rights considerations are integrated throughout the AI life cycle; 2) to help policymakers map out and implement normative strategies that will contribute to the equitable distribution of AI benefits across nations; and 3) to inform the creation of the regulatory and governance tools needed for the responsible design and deployment of AI in key systems like healthcare and justice.

Current Students

Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal

Publications

Recommandations pratiques pour une utilisation responsable de l’intelligence artificielle en santé mentale en contexte de pandémie
Carl-Maria Mörch
Pascale Lehoux
Xavier Dionne
La pandémie actuelle a provoqué une onde de choc dont les conséquences se font sentir dans tous les aspects de notre vie. Alors que la sa… (see more)nté physique a été généralement au cœur de l’attention scientifique et politique, il est devenu clair que la pandémie de COVID-19 a influé significativement sur la santé mentale de nombreux individus. Plus encore, elle aurait accentué les fragilités déjà existantes dans nos systèmes de santé mentale. Souvent moins financé ou soutenu que la santé physique, le domaine de la santé mentale pourrait-il bénéficier d’innovations en intelligence artificielle en période de pandémie ? Et si oui comment ? Que vous soyez développeur.e.s en IA, chercheur.e.s ou entrepreneur.e.s, ce document vise à vous fournir une synthèse des pistes d’actions et des ressources pour prévenir les principaux risques éthiques liés au développement d’applications d’IA dans le champ de la santé mentale. Pour illustrer ces principes, ce document propose de découvrir quatre cas fictif, à visée réaliste, à partir desquels il vous sera proposé de porter attention aux enjeux éthiques potentiels dans cette situation, aux enjeux d’innovation responsable à envisager, aux pistes d’action possibles inspirées de la liste de contrôle (Protocole Canadien conçu pour favoriser une utilisation responsable de l’IA en santé mentale et prévention du suicide, Mörch et al., 2020), aux ressources pratiques et à certains enjeux juridiques pertinents. Ce document a été élaboré par Carl-Maria Mörch, PhD, Algora Lab, Université de Montréal, Observatoire International sur les impacts sociétaux de l’Intelligence Artificielle et du Numérique (OBVIA), Mila – Institut Québécois d’Intelligence Artificielle, avec les contributions de Pascale Lehoux, Marc-Antoine Dilhac, Catherine Régis et Xavier Dionne.
Veille sur les outils numériques en santé dans le contexte de COVID-19
Aude Motulsky
Philippe Després
Cécile Petitgand
Jean Noel Nikiema
Jean-Louis Denis
Cybersanté : les tentatives juridiques pour objectiver un domaine en pleine effervescence
Vincent Gautrais
Investigating the Barriers to Physician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence- Based Decision Support System in Emergency Care: An Interpretative Qualitative Study.
Cécile Petitgand
Aude Motulsky
Jean-Louis Denis
Investigating the interconnections between human, technology and context in the implementation of a AI-based health information technology: a dynamic technological frame perspective
Collegiality as political work: Professions in today’s world of organizations
Jean-Louis Denis
Gianluca Veronesi
Sabrina Germain
Collegiality is frequently portrayed as an inherent characteristic of professions, associated with normative expectations autonomously deter… (see more)mined and regulated among peers. However, in advanced modernity other modes of governance responding to societal expectations and increasing state reliance on professional expertise often appear in tension with conditions of collegiality. This article argues that collegiality is not an immutable and inherent characteristic of the governance of professional work and organizations; rather, it is the result of the ability of a profession to operationalize the normative, relational, and structural requirements of collegiality at work. This article builds on different streams of scholarship to present a dynamic approach to collegiality based on political work by professionals to protect, maintain, and reformulate collegiality as a core set of principles governing work. Productive resistance and co-production are explored for their contribution to collegiality in this context, enabling accommodation between professions and organizations to achieve collective objectives and serving as a vector of change and adaptation of professional work in contemporary organizations. Engagement in co-production influences the ability to materialize collegiality at work, just as the maintenance and transformation of collegiality will operate in a context where professions participate and negotiate compromises with others legitimate modes of governance. Our arguments build on recent studies and hypotheses concerning the interface of professions and organizations to reveal the political work that underlies the affirmation and re-affirmation of collegiality as a mode of governance of work based on resistance and co-production.
Improving advance medical directives: lessons from Quebec
Louise G. Bernier
Policy-makers’ efforts to increase the uptake of advance medical directives (AMDs), and the legal constraints they impose on health profes… (see more)sionals, are bringing greater scrutiny to provincial AMD regimes. In 2015, Quebec introduced a new, legally binding form to be filled out for AMDs, which limits individuals’ expression of their wishes to narrow, checklist responses to questions on specific medical interventions. This form-focused regime has other shortcomings: it relies on individuals to self-inform and it does not provide them the opportunity to meaningfully convey their preferences for end-of-life care. A more values-based and collaborative approach provides a better path forward for Quebec and for other provinces.
La science, un droit humain. Mettre en œuvre le principe d’une science participative, équitable et accessible à tous