Portrait of Catherine Régis

Catherine Régis

Associate Academic Member
Canada CIFAR AI Chair
Full Professor, Université de Montréal
Research Topics
Deep Learning
Online Learning

Biography

Catherine Régis is Full Professor at the Faculty of Law of Université de Montréal (UdeM), Co-director of the Canadian AI Safety Institute research program and Director of Social Innovation and International Policy at IVADO. In addition to holding a Canada CIFAR Chair in AI and Human Rights and a Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy, she is a Senior Research Associate at the Intellectual Forum of the University of Cambridge. From 2021 to 2023, she was UdeM’s Associate VP for Strategic Planning and Responsible Digital Innovation.

Prof Régis is very active on the international scene. In 2022, she was appointed Cochair of the Working Group on Responsible AI of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), which comprises 29 member states (including Canada, France, Germany, India, Japan and the USA) for a period of two years. From 2020 to 2024, she led the Working Group on Responsible Digital Innovation and AI of the U7+ Alliance, which includes more than 50 universities from around the world. In 2022, she was a selected Fellow for the UN’s Institute for Training and Research’s program (UNITAR) in Science Diplomacy and, in 2024, she became part of the Technical Committee for UNESCO’s AI and the Rule of Law Program.

Prof Régis is used to executing consulting or training assignments both in Canada and elsewhere. She has been a visiting professor in different countries, and she has presented her work at institutions such as the OECD, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Alan Turing Institute, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Aspen Ministers Forum; in more than 20 universities worldwide (e.g., Cambridge, Costa Rica, Edinburgh, Georgetown, Osaka, Oxford, Sciences Po Paris, Sorbonne, Toronto); and in high-level conferences, including the AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park in 2023 and NeurIPS. She is involved in the development of Science Diplomacy (which aims at building leadership and communication skills to bridge science and diplomacy in policymaking) at the national and international levels. She also guides governments, public organizations and international organizations (e.g., academic health centres, ombudspeople and ministries of health or innovation, UNESCO, WHO, UN) on policy orientation and responsible AI projects. 

Most of her work explores how to best regulate AI at the national and international levels and to build responsible AI governance approaches more broadly. Her main objectives are: 1) to ensure human rights considerations are integrated throughout the AI life cycle; 2) to help policymakers map out and implement normative strategies that will contribute to the equitable distribution of AI benefits across nations; and 3) to inform the creation of the regulatory and governance tools needed for the responsible design and deployment of AI in key systems like healthcare and justice.

Current Students

Collaborating Alumni - Université de Montréal
Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal

Publications

Medical Doctors in Health Reforms
Jean-Louis Denis
Sabrina Germain
Gianluca Veronesi
Health and legal experts from England and Canada consider the influence of medical doctors on reforms in this comparative study. With reflec… (see more)tions on participation since the inception of publicly funded healthcare systems, they show how the status of doctors affects change.
Interprofessional collaboration and health policy: results from a Quebec mixed method legal research
Marie-Andree Girard
Jean-Louis Denis
Interprofessional collaboration and health policy: results from a Quebec mixed method legal research
Marie-Andree Girard
Jean-Louis Denis
ABSTRACT Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is central to effective care. This practice is structured by an array of laws, regulations an… (see more)d policies but the literature on their impact on IPC is scarce. This study aims to illustrate the gap between the texts and clinicians’ knowledge of the legal framework using an anonymous web-based survey. The survey, sent to nurses and physicians in Quebec, Canada, focused on the IPC legal framework, legal knowledge sources and IPC perceptions or beliefs. The primary outcome was to determine the gap between the law and understanding of the law. The secondary outcome was to identify legal knowledge sources for clinicians in Quebec. A total of 267 participants filled in the survey. For knowledge acquisition, 40% of physicians turned to insurers whereas 43% of nurses turned to their regulatory body. Only 30% of physicians correctly identified what activity is reserved for physicians while 39% of nurses correctly identified their reserved activity. Regarding legal perceptions, 28% of physicians and 39% of nurses thought IPC could increase their liability. These participants have a higher tendency to name liability-related issues as barriers to IPC. These results show an important discrepancy between clinicians’ knowledge about law and policies, and the actual texts themselves. This gap can lead to misinterpretations of the law by clinicians, ineffective policy changes by policymakers and can perpetuate ineffective implementation of IPC.
Correction to: The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLEonco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Michèle de Guise
Mado Desforges
Karine Bouchard
Cécile Vialaron
Louise Normandin
Monica Iliescu‐Nelea
Israël Fortin
Isabelle Ganache
Zeev Rosberger
Danielle Charpentier
L. Bélanger
Michel Dorval
Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri
Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
A. Boivin
Jean-François Pelletier
Nicolas Fernandez
Alain M. Danino
The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Michèle de Guise
Mado Desforges
Karine Bouchard
Cécile Vialaron
Louise Normandin
Monica Iliescu‐Nelea
Israël Fortin
Isabelle Ganache
Zeev Rosberger
Danielle Charpentier
L. Bélanger
Michel Dorval
Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri
Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
A. Boivin
Jean-François Pelletier
Nicolas Fernandez
Alain M. Danino
Analyzing the Contribution of Ethical Charters to Building the Future of Artificial Intelligence Governance
Lyse Langlois
Enjeux juridiques propres au modèle émergent des patients accompagnateurs dans les milieux de soins au Québec (Legal Issues Arising from the Emerging Model of Accompanying Patients in the Quebec Healthcare System)
Léa Boutrouille
Marie-Pascale Pomey
Recommandations pratiques pour une utilisation responsable de l’intelligence artificielle en santé mentale en contexte de pandémie
Carl-Maria Mörch
Pascale Lehoux
La pandémie actuelle a provoqué une onde de choc dont les conséquences se font sentir dans tous les aspects de notre vie. Alors que la sa… (see more)nté physique a été généralement au cœur de l’attention scientifique et politique, il est devenu clair que la pandémie de COVID-19 a influé significativement sur la santé mentale de nombreux individus. Plus encore, elle aurait accentué les fragilités déjà existantes dans nos systèmes de santé mentale. Souvent moins financé ou soutenu que la santé physique, le domaine de la santé mentale pourrait-il bénéficier d’innovations en intelligence artificielle en période de pandémie ? Et si oui comment ? Que vous soyez développeur.e.s en IA, chercheur.e.s ou entrepreneur.e.s, ce document vise à vous fournir une synthèse des pistes d’actions et des ressources pour prévenir les principaux risques éthiques liés au développement d’applications d’IA dans le champ de la santé mentale. Pour illustrer ces principes, ce document propose de découvrir quatre cas fictif, à visée réaliste, à partir desquels il vous sera proposé de porter attention aux enjeux éthiques potentiels dans cette situation, aux enjeux d’innovation responsable à envisager, aux pistes d’action possibles inspirées de la liste de contrôle (Protocole Canadien conçu pour favoriser une utilisation responsable de l’IA en santé mentale et prévention du suicide, Mörch et al., 2020), aux ressources pratiques et à certains enjeux juridiques pertinents. Ce document a été élaboré par Carl-Maria Mörch, PhD, Algora Lab, Université de Montréal, Observatoire International sur les impacts sociétaux de l’Intelligence Artificielle et du Numérique (OBVIA), Mila – Institut Québécois d’Intelligence Artificielle, avec les contributions de Pascale Lehoux, Marc-Antoine Dilhac, Catherine Régis et Xavier Dionne.
Veille sur les outils numériques en santé dans le contexte de COVID-19
Aude Motulsky
Philippe Després
Cécile Petitgand
Jean Noel Nikiema
Jean-Louis Denis
Cybersanté : les tentatives juridiques pour objectiver un domaine en pleine effervescence
Vincent Gautrais
Investigating the Barriers to Physician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence- Based Decision Support System in Emergency Care: An Interpretative Qualitative Study.
Cécile Petitgand
Aude Motulsky
Jean-Louis Denis
Investigating the interconnections between human, technology and context in the implementation of a AI-based health information technology: a dynamic technological frame perspective