Offered by Mila and the Public Policy Forum, this program is designed to equip policy and decision makers with the tools to navigate the opportunities and risks of AI. The next cohort will be held in French on September 1-2, 2026, at Mila.
The Mila AI Policy Fellowship translates deep AI expertise into rigorous, public-interest policy. Read the newest publication Bridging the Expertise Gap: Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms for AI Regulation by Moritz von Knebel
This program supports AI startups at any time of the year. Benefit from cutting-edge resources and tailored support to accelerate your technology's development.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Fine-tuning on narrow harmful tasks can cause emergent misalignment, where models generalize harmful behavior beyond the training distributi… (see more)on. Inoculation prompting can reduce this effect by explicitly eliciting the undesired behavior during training, but recent work shows that the behavior can reappear when evaluation prompts contain cues from the training context. We study what makes such prompts effective triggers. We find that textual similarity to the inoculation prompt is an incomplete predictor: prompts are more likely to re-elicit suppressed behavior when they induce activation states similar to those produced by the inoculation context. These findings advance our understanding of how inoculation prompting modulates conditional misalignment, and suggest that activation-space analysis can help identify when suppressed behaviors remain accessible under eval-time prompts.
Large language models finetuned on narrow harmful tasks are prone to
emergent misalignment (EM), where harmful behavior generalizes beyond t… (see more)he
training distribution. Interleaving benign data during finetuning has been
proposed as a mitigation, but recent work disagrees on whether it prevents
EM. In this paper, we investigate this disagreement on Qwen-2.5 7B and 32B, and find that no single property of the interleaved data, taken
in isolation, accounts for the gap. Instead, much of it traces to the
evaluation itself, as the standard EM benchmark is sensitive to the length
of the prompts it uses, and lengthening the evaluation prompts substantially
shifts measured misalignment across model sizes. We then identify a
region in the model's activations that predicts whether a given
interleaved set will prevent EM, and show that reformulating benign data
to fall within it substantially reduces EM on both 7B and 32B. This suggests that the standard EM benchmark, which relies on short prompts, may misrepresent the effectiveness of proposed mitigations.