The Mila AI Policy Fellowship translates deep AI expertise into rigorous, public-interest policy. Read the newest publication Bridging the Expertise Gap: Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms for AI Regulation by Moritz von Knebel
This program supports AI startups at any time of the year. Benefit from cutting-edge resources and tailored support to accelerate your technology's development.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Publications
Reference radiation selection is confirmed as a significant source of relative biological effectiveness variation for neutrons.
Laura C Paterson
Stephen Pecoskie
Farrah Norton
Norma Ybarra
J. Kildea
Richard B Richardson
2025-12-08
International Journal of Radiation Biology (published)
Despite enormous interest in psychedelics for psychiatric interventions, potential underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we… (see more) confirm that a single dose of psilocybin increases synaptic transmission in mouse medial prefrontal cortex. Using scRNA-sequencing, we identify cell-type specific mechanisms of sustained neuroplastic effects. We show that, 24h post-psilocybin, expression of plasticity-related genes is increased in excitatory neurons and that transcription in a type of deep layer near projecting neuron, L5/6 NP, is robustly altered. Analyzing receptor expression patterns reveals that this cell-type specificity does not align with 5-HT
2A
expression but aligns with 5-HT
2C
expression patterns. Further, multivariate analyses identify psilocybin-induced gene expression patterns in L5/6 NP neurons predict 5-HT
2C
, but not 5-HT
2A
, transcript levels. Pharmacologic manipulation with a 5-HT
2C
antagonist attenuates the post-acute sustained effect of psilocybin on synaptic transmission, highlighting 5-HT
2C
signaling and L5/6 NP neurons as key mediators of psychedelic drug action’s sustained neuroplastic effects in mPFC.
Spatial transcriptomics has revolutionized our ability to characterize tissues and diseases by contextualizing gene expression with spatial … (see more)organization. Available methods require researchers to either train a model using histology-based annotations or use annotation-free clustering approaches to uncover spatial domains. However, few methods provide researchers with a way to jointly analyze spatial data from both annotation-free and annotation-guided perspectives using consistent inductive biases and levels of interpretability. A single framework with consistent inductive biases ensures coherence and transferability across tasks, reducing the risks of conflicting assumptions. To this end, we propose the Spatial Topic Model (SpaTM), a topic-modeling framework capable of annotation-guided and annotation-free analysis of spatial transcriptomics data. SpaTM can be used to learn gene programs that represent histology-based annotations while providing researchers with the ability to infer spatial domains with an annotation-free approach if manual annotations are limited or noisy. We demonstrate SpaTM’s interpretability with its use of topic mixtures to represent cell states and transcriptional programs and how its intuitive framework facilitates the integration of annotation-guided and annotation-free analyses of spatial data with downstream analyses such as cell type deconvolution. Finally, we demonstrate how both approaches can be used to extend the analysis of large-scale snRNA-seq atlases with the inference of cell proximity and spatial annotations in human brains with Major Depressive Disorder.
This is the Second Key Update to the 2025 International AI Safety Report. The First Key Update (1) discussed developments in the capabilitie… (see more)s of general-purpose AI models and systems and associated risks. This Key Update covers how various actors, including researchers, companies, and governments, are approaching risk management and technical mitigations for AI.
The past year has seen important developments in AI risk management, including better techniques for training safer models and monitoring their outputs. While this represents tangible progress, significant gaps remain. It is often uncertain how effective current measures are at preventing harms, and effectiveness varies across time and applications. There are many opportunities to further strengthen existing safeguard techniques and to develop new ones.
This Key Update provides a concise overview of critical developments in risk management practices and technical risk mitigation since the publication of the 2025 AI Safety Report in January. It highlights where progress is being made and where gaps remain. Above all, it aims to support policymakers, researchers, and the public in navigating a rapidly changing environment, helping them to make informed and timely decisions about the governance of general-purpose AI.
Professor Yoshua BengioUniversité de Montréal / LawZero /Mila – Quebec AI Institute & Chair
Evaluation and improvement of algorithmic fairness for COVID-19 severity classification using Explainable Artificial Intelligence-based bias mitigation
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the growing reliance on machine learning (ML) models for predicting disease severity, which is importa… (see more)nt for clinical decision-making and equitable resource allocation. While achieving high predictive accuracy is important, ensuring fairness in the prediction output of these models is equally important to prevent bias-driven disparities in healthcare. This study evaluates fairness in a machine learning-based COVID-19 severity classification model and proposes an Explainable AI (XAI)-based bias mitigation strategy to address sex-related bias.
Using data from the Quebec Biobank, we developed an XGBoost-based multi-class classification model. Fairness was assessed using Subset Accuracy Parity Difference (SAPD) and Label-wise Equal Opportunity Difference (LEOD) metrics. Four bias mitigation strategies were implemented and evaluated: Fair Representation Learning, Fair Classifier Using Constraints, Adversarial Debiasing, and our proposed XAI-based method utilizing SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method for feature importance analysis.
The study cohort included 1642 COVID-19 positive older adults (mean age: 77.5), balance equally between males and females. The baseline (unmitigated) classification model achieved 90.68% accuracy but exhibited a 10.11% Subset Accuracy Parity Difference between sexes, indicating a relatively large bias. The introduced XAI-based method demonstrated a better trade-off between model performance and fairness compared to existing bias mitigation methods by identifying sex-sensitive feature interactions and integrating them into the model re-training.
Traditional fairness interventions often compromise accuracy to a greater extent. Our XAI-based method achieves the best balance between classification performance and bias, enhancing its clinical applicability.
The XAI-driven bias mitigation intervention effectively reduces sex-based disparities in COVID-19 severity prediction without the significant accuracy loss observed in traditional methods. This approach provides a framework for developing fair and accurate clinical decision support systems for older adults, which ensures equitable care in clinical risk stratification and resource allocation.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain limited in spatial reasoning tasks that require multi-view understanding and embodied perspective shift… (see more)s. Recent approaches such as MindJourney attempt to mitigate this gap through test-time scaling where a world model imagines action-conditioned trajectories and a heuristic verifier selects helpful views from such trajectories. In this work, we systematically examine how such test-time verifiers behave across benchmarks, uncovering both their promise and their pitfalls. Our uncertainty-based analyses show that MindJourney's verifier provides little meaningful calibration, and that random scoring often reduces answer entropy equally well, thus exposing systematic action biases and unreliable reward signals. To mitigate these, we introduce a Verification through Spatial Assertions (ViSA) framework that grounds the test-time reward in verifiable, frame-anchored micro-claims. This principled verifier consistently improves spatial reasoning on the SAT-Real benchmark and corrects trajectory-selection biases through more balanced exploratory behavior. However, on the challenging MMSI-Bench, none of the verifiers, including ours, achieve consistent scaling, suggesting that the current world models form an information bottleneck where imagined views fail to enrich fine-grained reasoning. Together, these findings chart the bad, good, and ugly aspects of test-time verification for world-model-based reasoning. Our code is available at https://github.com/chandar-lab/visa-for-mindjourney.