Portrait of Spandana Gella is unavailable

Spandana Gella

Collaborating researcher
Supervisor
Research Topics
Natural Language Processing

Publications

StarFlow: Generating Structured Workflow Outputs From Sketch Images
Chao Wang
Amirhossein Abaskohi
Juan A. Rodriguez
David Vazquez
Sai Rajeswar
UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction
Xiangru Jian
Kevin Qinghong Lin
Juan A. Rodriguez
Montek Kalsi
M. T. ¨Ozsu
David Vazquez
Sai Rajeswar
Human Annotator
SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents
LLM-based agents are becoming increasingly proficient at solving web-based tasks. With this capability comes a greater risk of misuse for ma… (see more)licious purposes, such as posting misinformation in an online forum or selling illicit substances on a website. To evaluate these risks, we propose SafeArena, the first benchmark to focus on the deliberate misuse of web agents. SafeArena comprises 250 safe and 250 harmful tasks across four websites. We classify the harmful tasks into five harm categories -- misinformation, illegal activity, harassment, cybercrime, and social bias, designed to assess realistic misuses of web agents. We evaluate leading LLM-based web agents, including GPT-4o, Claude-3.5 Sonnet, Qwen-2-VL 72B, and Llama-3.2 90B, on our benchmark. To systematically assess their susceptibility to harmful tasks, we introduce the Agent Risk Assessment framework that categorizes agent behavior across four risk levels. We find agents are surprisingly compliant with malicious requests, with GPT-4o and Qwen-2 completing 34.7% and 27.3% of harmful requests, respectively. Our findings highlight the urgent need for safety alignment procedures for web agents. Our benchmark is available here: https://safearena.github.io
SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents
Ada Defne Tur
Esin DURMUS
Karolina Sta'nczak
AlignVLM: Bridging Vision and Language Latent Spaces for Multimodal Understanding
Juan A. Rodriguez
Chao Wang
Akshay Kalkunte Suresh
Xiangru Jian
Pierre-Andre Noel
Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan
Enamul Hoque
Issam Hadj Laradji
David Vazquez
Sai Rajeswar
Aligning visual features with language embeddings is a key challenge in vision-language models (VLMs). The performance of such models hinges… (see more) on having a good connector that maps visual features generated by a vision encoder to a shared embedding space with the LLM while preserving semantic similarity. Existing connectors, such as multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), often produce out-of-distribution or noisy inputs, leading to misalignment between the modalities. In this work, we propose a novel vision-text alignment method, AlignVLM, that maps visual features to a weighted average of LLM text embeddings. Our approach leverages the linguistic priors encoded by the LLM to ensure that visual features are mapped to regions of the space that the LLM can effectively interpret. AlignVLM is particularly effective for document understanding tasks, where scanned document images must be accurately mapped to their textual content. Our extensive experiments show that AlignVLM achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to prior alignment methods. We provide further analysis demonstrating improved vision-text feature alignment and robustness to noise.
WebMMU: A Benchmark for Multimodal Multilingual Website Understanding and Code Generation
Understanding diverse web data and automating web development presents an exciting challenge for agentic AI. While existing benchmarks addre… (see more)ss isolated web-based tasks—such as website-based Visual Question Answering (VQA) and UI-to-code generation—they lack a unified evaluation suite for assessing web agents that interact with and reason about web environments. We introduce WebMMU, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating AI-driven web agents across multilingual website VQA, HTML/CSS/JavaScript code editing, and sketch-to-code generation. WebMMU provides a comprehensive evaluation suite with real-world website data, multi-step reasoning tasks, and functional UI understanding. Benchmarking state-of-the-art multimodal models on WebMMU reveals significant limitations in web-based reasoning, layout understanding, and structured code generation, particularly in preserving UI hierarchy, handling multilingual content, and producing robust, functional code. While most existing models are optimized for English-only settings, WebMMU highlights the challenges of cross-lingual adaptation in real-world web development. These findings expose critical gaps in current models’ ability to understand website structures, execute user instructions, and generate high-quality web code, underscoring the need for more advanced multimodal reasoning in AI-driven web understanding and development.
WebMMU: A Benchmark for Multimodal Multilingual Website Understanding and Code Generation
David Vazquez
Juan A. Rodriguez
Sai Rajeswar
ServiceNow
WebMMU Benchmark
Understanding diverse web data and automating web development presents an exciting challenge for agentic AI. While existing benchmarks addre… (see more)ss isolated web-based tasks—such as website-based Visual Question Answering (VQA) and UI-to-code generation—they lack a unified evaluation suite for assessing web agents that interact with and reason about web environments. We introduce WebMMU, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating AI-driven web agents across multilingual website VQA, HTML/CSS/JavaScript code editing, and sketch-to-code generation. WebMMU provides a comprehensive evaluation suite with real-world website data, multi-step reasoning tasks, and functional UI understanding. Benchmarking state-of-the-art multimodal models on WebMMU reveals significant limitations in web-based reasoning, layout understanding, and structured code generation, particularly in preserving UI hierarchy, handling multilingual content, and producing robust, functional code. While most existing models are optimized for English-only settings, WebMMU highlights the challenges of cross-lingual adaptation in real-world web development. These findings expose critical gaps in current models’ ability to understand website structures, execute user instructions, and generate high-quality web code, underscoring the need for more advanced multimodal reasoning in AI-driven web understanding and development.
PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?
Sai Rajeswar
Valentina Zantedeschi
Joao Monteiro
Understanding how effectively large vision language models (VLMs) compare visual inputs is crucial across numerous applications, yet this fu… (see more)ndamental capability remains insufficiently assessed. While VLMs are increasingly deployed for tasks requiring comparative judgment, including automated evaluation, re-ranking, and retrieval-augmented generation, no systematic framework exists to measure their performance in these scenarios. We present PairBench, a simple framework that evaluates VLMs as customizable similarity tools using widely available image datasets. Our approach introduces four key metrics for reliable comparison: alignment with human annotations, consistency across pair ordering, distribution smoothness, and controllability through prompting. Our analysis reveals that no model consistently excels across all metrics, with each demonstrating distinct strengths and weaknesses. Most concerning is the widespread inability of VLMs to maintain symmetric similarity scores. Interestingly, we demonstrate that performance on our benchmark strongly correlates with popular benchmarks used for more complex tasks, while providing additional metrics into controllability, smoothness and ordering. This makes PairBench a unique and comprehensive framework to evaluate the performance of VLMs for automatic evaluation depending on the task.
PairBench: A Systematic Framework for Selecting Reliable Judge VLMs
Sai Rajeswar
Valentina Zantedeschi
Joao Monteiro
As large vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators, understanding their ability to effectively compare dat… (see more)a pairs as instructed in the prompt becomes essential. To address this, we present PairBench, a low-cost framework that systematically evaluates VLMs as customizable similarity tools across various modalities and scenarios. Through PairBench, we introduce four metrics that represent key desiderata of similarity scores: alignment with human annotations, consistency for data pairs irrespective of their order, smoothness of similarity distributions, and controllability through prompting. Our analysis demonstrates that no model, whether closed- or open-source, is superior on all metrics; the optimal choice depends on an auto evaluator's desired behavior (e.g., a smooth vs. a sharp judge), highlighting risks of widespread adoption of VLMs as evaluators without thorough assessment. For instance, the majority of VLMs struggle with maintaining symmetric similarity scores regardless of order. Additionally, our results show that the performance of VLMs on the metrics in PairBench closely correlates with popular benchmarks, showcasing its predictive power in ranking models.
BigDocs: An Open Dataset for Training Multimodal Models on Document and Code Tasks
Juan A. Rodriguez
Xiangru Jian
Akshay Kalkunte Suresh
Amirhossein Abaskohi
Pierre-Andre Noel
Sanket Biswas … (see 19 more)
Sara Shanian
Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan
Joao Monteiro
Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham
Torsten Scholak
Sepideh Kharaghani
Sean Hughes
M. Özsu
Issam Hadj Laradji
David Vazquez
Sai Rajeswar
Multimodal AI has the potential to significantly enhance document-understanding tasks, such as processing receipts, understanding workflows,… (see more) extracting data from documents, and summarizing reports. Code generation tasks that require long-structured outputs can also be enhanced by multimodality. Despite this, their use in commercial applications is often limited due to limited access to relevant training data and restrictive licensing, which hinders open access. To address these limitations, we introduce BigDocs-7.5M, a high-quality, open-access dataset comprising 7.5 million multimodal documents across 30 tasks. We use an efficient data curation process to ensure that our data is high quality and license-permissive. Our process emphasizes accountability, responsibility, and transparency through filtering rules, traceable metadata, and careful content analysis. Additionally, we introduce BigDocs-Bench,, a benchmark suite with 10 novel tasks where we carefully create datasets that reflect real-world use cases involving reasoning over Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) and code generation from images. Our experiments show that training with BigDocs-Bench, improves average performance up to 25.8% over closed-source GPT-4o in document reasoning and structured output tasks such as Screenshot2HTML or Image2Latex generation. Finally, human evaluations revealed that participants preferred the outputs from models trained with BigDocs over those from GPT-4o. This suggests that BigDocs can help both academics and the open-source community utilize and improve AI tools to enhance multimodal capabilities and document reasoning.
BigDocs: An Open Dataset for Training Multimodal Models on Document and Code Tasks
Juan A. Rodriguez
Xiangru Jian
Akshay Kalkunte Suresh
Amirhossein Abaskohi
Pierre-Andre Noel
Sanket Biswas … (see 23 more)
Sara Shanian
Noah Bolger
Kurt MacDonald
Simon Fauvel
Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan
Srinivas Sunkara
Joao Monteiro
Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham
Torsten Scholak
Sepideh Kharaghani
Sean Hughes
M. Özsu
Issam Hadj Laradji
David Vazquez
Sai Rajeswar
PairBench: A Systematic Framework for Selecting Reliable Judge VLMs
Sai Rajeswar
Valentina Zantedeschi
Joao Monteiro
As large vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators, understanding their ability to effectively compare dat… (see more)a pairs as instructed in the prompt becomes essential. To address this, we present PairBench, a low-cost framework that systematically evaluates VLMs as customizable similarity tools across various modalities and scenarios. Through PairBench, we introduce four metrics that represent key desiderata of similarity scores: alignment with human annotations, consistency for data pairs irrespective of their order, smoothness of similarity distributions, and controllability through prompting. Our analysis demonstrates that no model, whether closed- or open-source, is superior on all metrics; the optimal choice depends on an auto evaluator's desired behavior (e.g., a smooth vs. a sharp judge), highlighting risks of widespread adoption of VLMs as evaluators without thorough assessment. For instance, the majority of VLMs struggle with maintaining symmetric similarity scores regardless of order. Additionally, our results show that the performance of VLMs on the metrics in PairBench closely correlates with popular benchmarks, showcasing its predictive power in ranking models.