Jacob-Junqi Tian

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

Taylor Lynn Curtis

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Yuxiang Guan

Misinformation is a complex societal issue, and mitigating solutions are difficult to create due to data deficiencies. To address this probl… (see more)em, we have curated the largest collection of (mis)information datasets in the literature, totaling 75. From these, we evaluated the quality of all of the 36 datasets that consist of statements or claims, as well as the 9 datasets that consists of data in purely paragraph form. We assess these datasets to identify those with solid foundations for empirical work and those with flaws that could result in misleading and non-generalizable results, such as insufficient label quality, spurious correlations. We further provide state-of-the-art baselines on all these datasets, but show that regardless of label quality, categorical labels may no longer give an accurate evaluation of detection model performance. We discuss alternatives to mitigate this problem. Overall, this guide aims to provide a roadmap for obtaining higher quality data and conducting more effective evaluations, ultimately improving research in misinformation detection. All datasets and other artifacts are available at [anonymized].

2025-08-03

Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (published)

doi.org

A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluation

Camille Thibault

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

Taylor Lynn Curtis

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Luke Yuxiang Guan

2025-08-03

Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 (published)

doi.org

AIF-GEN: Open-Source Platform and Synthetic Dataset Suite for Reinforcement Learning on Large Language Models

Jacob Chmura

Shahrad Mohammadzadeh

Taz Scott-Talib

Nishanth Anand

2025-06-09

ICML.cc/2025/Workshop/CODEML (published)

A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and Evaluation

Camille Thibault

Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski

Taylor Lynn Curtis

James Zhou

Florence Laflamme

Yuxiang Guan

2024-11-07

ArXiv (preprint)

arxiv.org

Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Models

Bijean Ghafouri

Shahrad Mohammadzadeh

James Zhou

Pratheeksha Nair

Mayank Goel

Large language models are increasingly relied upon as sources of information, but their propensity for generating false or misleading statem… (see more)ents with high confidence poses risks for users and society. In this paper, we confront the critical problem of epistemic miscalibration—where a model's linguistic assertiveness fails to reflect its true internal certainty. We introduce a new human-labeled dataset and a novel method for measuring the linguistic assertiveness of Large Language Models which cuts error rates by over 50% relative to previous benchmarks. Validated across multiple datasets, our method reveals a stark misalignment between how confidently models linguistically present information and their actual accuracy. Further human evaluations confirm the severity of this miscalibration. This evidence underscores the urgent risk of the overstated certainty Large Language Models hold which may mislead users on a massive scale. Our framework provides a crucial step forward in diagnosing and correcting this miscalibration, offering a path to safer and more trustworthy AI across domains.

2024-10-12

NeurIPS.cc/2024/Workshop/SafeGenAi (poster)

Epistemic Integrity in Large Language Models

Bijean Ghafouri

Shahrad Mohammadzadeh

James Zhou

Pratheeksha Nair

Mayank Goel

Large language models are increasingly relied upon as sources of information, but their propensity for generating false or misleading statem… (see more)ents with high confidence poses risks for users and society. In this paper, we confront the critical problem of epistemic miscalibration—where a model's linguistic assertiveness fails to reflect its true internal certainty. We introduce a new human-labeled dataset and a novel method for measuring the linguistic assertiveness of Large Language Models which cuts error rates by over 50% relative to previous benchmarks. Validated across multiple datasets, our method reveals a stark misalignment between how confidently models linguistically present information and their actual accuracy. Further human evaluations confirm the severity of this miscalibration. This evidence underscores the urgent risk of the overstated certainty Large Language Models hold which may mislead users on a massive scale. Our framework provides a crucial step forward in diagnosing and correcting this miscalibration, offering a path to safer and more trustworthy AI across domains.

2024-10-12

NeurIPS.cc/2024/Workshop/SafeGenAi (poster)