Portrait of Amin Memarian is unavailable

Amin Memarian

Collaborating researcher
Supervisor
Irina Rish
Research Topics
Reinforcement Learning

Publications

Position: Collusion Risks Among AI Reasoning Agents Justify Certification Requirements for Making Market Decisions
Matthew Riemer
Tommaso Tosato
Maximilian Puelma Touzel
Amin Memarian
Guillaume Dumas
Glen Berseth
Irina Rish
This position paper argues that AI agents with chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities are predisposed to exhibit collusive behavior and sho… (see more)uld be required to obtain behavioral certification before making decisions that affect economic markets. This is because integrating these agents into society could collapse the legal evidentiary distinction between competition and collusion among independent firms without eroding the economic harm distinction. Experiments with DeepSeek-R1 agents in the Bertrand oligopoly pricing domain reveal a tendency towards tacit collusion that persists even when humans prompt the agents not to collude. We further show that the chain-of- thought of these agents can be steered toward either extremely collusive or highly competitive behavior in a way that is not semantically detectable by another LLM analyzing the reasoning traces. As a result, deploying reasoning agents for market decisions leads to collusive economic outcomes without any evidence of conspiracy or intent. Thus, certification based on observed behavior in representative situations is necessary to prevent collusion. We provide preliminary evidence that such agents can be steered in a generalizable way toward efficient competitive equilibria. However, developing a comprehensive behavioral certification will be required before these models can be deployed in real-world markets while ensuring their stability and efficiency.
2025-12-31
International Conference on Machine Learning (Accept (regular))
openreview.net
openreview.net
Scalable Approaches for a Theory of Many Minds
Maximilian Puelma Touzel
Amin Memarian
Matthew D Riemer
Andrei Mircea
Andrew Robert Williams
Elin Ahlstrand
Lucas Lehnert
Rupali Bhati
Guillaume Dumas
Irina Rish
A major challenge as we move towards building agents for real-world problems, which could involve a massive number of human and/or machine a… (see more)gents, is that we must learn to reason about the behavior of these many other agents. In this paper, we consider the problem of scaling a predictive Theory of Mind (ToM) model to a very large number of interacting agents with a fixed computational budget. Motivated by the limited diversity of agent types, existing approaches to scalable TOM learn versatile single-agent representations for quickly adapting to new agents encountered sequentially. We consider the more general setting that many agents are observed in parallel and formulate the corresponding Theory of Many Minds (ToMM) problem of estimating the joint policy. We frame the scaling behavior of solutions in terms of parameter sharing schemes and in particular propose two parameter-free architectural features that endow models with the ability to exploit action correlations: encoding a multi-agent context, and decoding through an abstracted joint action space. The increased predictive capabilities that have come with foundation models have made it easier to imagine the possibility of using these models to make simulations that imitate the behavior of many agents within complex real-world systems. Being able to perform these simulations in a general-purpose way would not only help make more capable agents, it also would be a very useful capability for applications in social science, political science, and economics.
2024-06-17
ICML.cc/2024/Workshop/Agentic_Markets (poster)
openreview.net
openreview.net
Is a Good Description Worth a Thousand Pictures? Reducing Multimodal Alignment to Text-Based, Unimodal Alignment
Amin Memarian
Touraj Laleh
Irina Rish
Ardavan S. Nobandegani
Generative AI systems (ChatGPT, Llama, etc.) are increasingly adopted across a range of high-stake domains, including healthcare and crimina… (see more)l justice system. This rapid adoption indeed raises moral and ethical concerns. The emerging field of AI alignment aims to make AI systems that respect human values. In this work, we focus on evaluating the ethics of multimodal AI systems involving both text and images --- a relatively under-explored area, as most alignment work is currently focused on language models. Specifically, here we investigate whether the multimodal alignment problem (i.e., the problem of aligning a multimodal system) could be effectively reduced to the (text-based) unimodal alignment problem, wherein a language model would make a moral judgment purely based on a description of an image. Focusing on GPT-4 and LLaVA as two prominent examples of multimodal systems, here we demonstrate, rather surprisingly, that this reduction can be achieved with a relatively small loss in moral judgment performance in the case of LLaVa, and virtually no loss in the case of GPT-4.
2024-06-16
ICML.cc/2024/Workshop/MFHAIA (poster)
openreview.net
openreview.net