The upcoming meeting, taking place on November 10 at Mila, will explore how we can collectively develop, govern, and deploy high-performing, reliable, and secure agentic systems by connecting academic researchers, industry experts, and practitioners.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
False negatives—missed detections of harmful content—remain the dominant risk in safety-critical moderation pipelines. We introduce RAG-… (see more)Safe, a recall-first framework that integrates distribution-preserving contrastive augmentation, committee-diverse retrieval, and a recall-oriented decision policy into a unified moderation architecture. The framework is evaluated using a compact, fully auditable testbed designed to enforce strict leakage control: original samples alone determine the train–test split, and all paraphrases inherit their parent assignment. Within this controlled setting, conventional retrieval-augmented pipelines—both commercial (API embeddings + hosted LLM) and open-source (FAISS + local LLaMA-3)—consistently under-detect unsafe content (FLAGGED recall 0.44). Applying RAG-Safe raises FLAGGED recall to approximately 0.56 across both stacks while preserving overall accuracy ( 0.66) and macro-F1 ( 0.65). A non-RAG classifier baseline provided in our public repository shows similar recallfirst behaviour, reinforcing that these gains are not architecture-specific. Rather than comparing individual model components, we interpret the results as pipeline-level evidence that boundary-focused augmentation, retrieval diversity, and calibrated thresholds jointly shift LLM moderation into a safer operating regime. We conclude by discussing limitations—particularly domain transferability and adversarial robustness—and outline directions for scaling RAG-Safe to broader moderation contexts. Keywords: Content moderation, Recall-first classification, Distribution-preserving data augmentation, Committee-based retrieval, Retrieval-augmented large language models, Safety-critical AI
2026-06-28
Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (published)
A common approach for evaluating neural surrogates of phase-field equations is aggregate field error against a reference solver, a measure t… (see more)hat can overlook bifurcations: abrupt shifts between qualitatively distinct outcomes, e.g., whether a phase-field droplet dissolves or persists. We propose evaluating neural phase-field surrogates in terms of their capacity for bifurcation preservation. We demonstrate the diagnostic on the Cahn-Hilliard (CH) critical droplet boundary using a droplet-aware Fourier Neural Operator, which reaches a moderate held-out rollout error, with relative
2026-05-29
AI4Physics @ International Conference on Machine Learning (published)