We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Publications
OpenLex3D: A New Evaluation Benchmark for Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Representations
Morphology-aware policy learning is a means of enhancing policy sample efficiency by aggregating data from multiple agents. These types of p… (see more)olicies have previously been shown to help generalize over dynamic, kinematic, and limb configuration variations between agent morphologies. Unfortunately, these policies still have sub-optimal zero-shot performance compared to end-to-end finetuning on morphologies at deployment. This limitation has ramifications in practical applications such as robotics because further data collection to perform end-to-end finetuning can be computationally expensive. In this work, we investigate combining morphology-aware pretraining with \textit{parameter efficient finetuning} (PEFT) techniques to help reduce the learnable parameters necessary to specialize a morphology-aware policy to a target embodiment. We compare directly tuning sub-sets of model weights, input learnable adapters, and prefix tuning techniques for online finetuning. Our analysis reveals that PEFT techniques in conjunction with policy pre-training generally help reduce the number of samples to necessary to improve a policy compared to training models end-to-end from scratch. We further find that tuning as few as less than 1\% of total parameters will improve policy performance compared the zero-shot performance of the base pretrained a policy.
Morphology-aware policy learning is a means of enhancing policy sample efficiency by aggregating data from multiple agents. These types of p… (see more)olicies have previously been shown to help generalize over dynamic, kinematic, and limb configuration variations between agent morphologies. Unfortunately, these policies still have sub-optimal zero-shot performance compared to end-to-end finetuning on morphologies at deployment. This limitation has ramifications in practical applications such as robotics because further data collection to perform end-to-end finetuning can be computationally expensive. In this work, we investigate combining morphology-aware pretraining with \textit{parameter efficient finetuning} (PEFT) techniques to help reduce the learnable parameters necessary to specialize a morphology-aware policy to a target embodiment. We compare directly tuning sub-sets of model weights, input learnable adapters, and prefix tuning techniques for online finetuning. Our analysis reveals that PEFT techniques in conjunction with policy pre-training generally help reduce the number of samples to necessary to improve a policy compared to training models end-to-end from scratch. We further find that tuning as few as less than 1\% of total parameters will improve policy performance compared the zero-shot performance of the base pretrained a policy.
Robustness research in reinforcement learning often focuses on ensuring that the policy consistently exhibits capable, goal-driven behavior.… (see more) However, not every capable behavior is the intended behavior. *Goal misgeneralization* can occur when the policy generalizes capably with respect to a 'proxy goal' whose optimal behavior correlates with the intended goal on the training distribution, but not out of distribution. Though the intended goal would be ambiguous if they were perfectly correlated in training, we show progress can be made if the goals are only *nearly ambiguous*, with the training distribution containing a small proportion of *disambiguating* levels. We observe that the training signal from disambiguating levels could be amplified by regret-based prioritization. We formally show that approximately optimal policies on maximal-regret levels avoid the harmful effects of goal misgeneralization, which may exist without this prioritization. Empirically, we find that current regret-based Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) methods can mitigate the effects of goal misgeneralization, though do not always entirely eliminate it. Our theoretical and empirical results show that as UED methods improve they could further mitigate goal misgeneralization in practice.
Multi-task reinforcement learning (MTRL) aims to endow a single agent with the ability to perform well on multiple tasks. Recent works have … (see more)focused on developing novel sophisticated architectures to improve performance, often resulting in larger models; it is unclear, however, whether the performance gains are a consequence of the architecture design or the extra parameters. We argue that gains are mostly due to scale by demonstrating that naively scaling up a simple MTRL baseline to match parameter counts outperforms the more sophisticated architectures, and these gains benefit most from scaling the critic over the actor. Additionally, we explore the training stability advantages that come with task diversity, demonstrating that increasing the number of tasks can help mitigate plasticity loss. Our findings suggest that MTRL's simultaneous training across multiple tasks provides a natural framework for beneficial parameter scaling in reinforcement learning, challenging the need for complex architectural innovations.
Multi-task reinforcement learning (MTRL) aims to endow a single agent with the ability to perform well on multiple tasks. Recent works have … (see more)focused on developing novel sophisticated architectures to improve performance, often resulting in larger models; it is unclear, however, whether the performance gains are a consequence of the architecture design or the extra parameters. We argue that gains are mostly due to scale by demonstrating that naively scaling up a simple MTRL baseline to match parameter counts outperforms the more sophisticated architectures, and these gains benefit most from scaling the critic over the actor. Additionally, we explore the training stability advantages that come with task diversity, demonstrating that increasing the number of tasks can help mitigate plasticity loss. Our findings suggest that MTRL's simultaneous training across multiple tasks provides a natural framework for beneficial parameter scaling in reinforcement learning, challenging the need for complex architectural innovations.
Offline reinforcement learning has gained a lot of popularity for its potential to solve industry challenges. However, real-world environmen… (see more)ts are often highly stochastic and partially observable, leading long-term planners to overfit to offline data in model-based settings. Input-driven Markov Decision Processes (IDMDPs) offer a way to work with some of the uncertainty by letting designers separate what the agent has control over (states) from what it cannot (inputs) in the environnement. These stochastic external inputs are often difficult to model. Under the assumption that the input model will be imperfect, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff under shallow planning in IDMDPs. Paving the way to input-driven planning horizons, we also investigate the similarity of optimal planning horizons at different inputs given the structure of the input space.
Offline reinforcement learning has gained a lot of popularity for its potential to solve industry challenges. However, real-world environmen… (see more)ts are often highly stochastic and partially observable, leading long-term planners to overfit to offline data in model-based settings. Input-driven Markov Decision Processes (IDMDPs) offer a way to work with some of the uncertainty by letting designers separate what the agent has control over (states) from what it cannot (inputs) in the environnement. These stochastic external inputs are often difficult to model. Under the assumption that the input model will be imperfect, we investigate the bias-variance tradeoff under shallow planning in IDMDPs. Paving the way to input-driven planning horizons, we also investigate the similarity of optimal planning horizons at different inputs given the structure of the input space.
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (see more)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (see more)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.
A key approach to state abstraction is approximating behavioral metrics (notably, bisimulation metrics) in the observation space, and embed … (see more)these learned distances in the representation space. While promising for robustness to task-irrelevant noise shown in prior work, accurately estimating these metrics remains challenging, requiring various design choices that create gaps between theory and practice.
Prior evaluations focus mainly on final returns, leaving the quality of learned metrics and the source of performance gains unclear.
To systematically assess how metric learning works in deep RL, we evaluate five recent approaches. We unify them under isometric embedding, identify key design choices, and benchmark them with baselines across 20 state-based and 14 pixel-based tasks, spanning 250+ configurations with diverse noise settings.
Beyond final returns, we introduce the denoising factor to quantify the encoder’s ability to filter distractions. To further isolate the effect of metric learning, we propose an isolated metric estimation setting, where the encoder is influenced solely by the metric loss.
Our results show that metric learning improves return and denoising only marginally, as its benefits fade when key design choices, such as layer normalization and self-prediction loss, are incorporated into the baseline. We also find that commonly used benchmarks (e.g., grayscale videos, varying state-based Gaussian noise dimensions) add little difficulty, while Gaussian noise with random projection and pixel-based Gaussian noise remain challenging even for the best methods.
Finally, we release an open-source, modular codebase to improve reproducibility and support future research on metric learning in deep RL.
