Portrait of Shin (Alexandre) Koseki

Shin (Alexandre) Koseki

Affiliate Member
Assistant Professor, Université de Montréal, School of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture
Research Topics
Data Mining

Biography

Shin Koseki is an assistant professor at the School of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture of the Faculty of Environmental Design, Université de Montréal. He is also the director and chairholder of the UNESCO Chair in Urban Landscape. Trained in architecture and urban planning in Canada and Switzerland, Koseki is interested in the integration of new technologies in planning practices, the contribution of interactive democracy to the sustainable development of territories, and the role of public space in the acquisition of knowledge and skills. His research interests include the application of AI systems in urban design and new processes of environmental and technological governance.

In 2022, Koseki co-authored the white paper produced jointly by Mila – Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute and UN-Habitat entitled “AI & Cities: Risks, Applications and Governance.”

His research on codesigning responsible AI systems in cities is supported by the New Frontiers in Research Fund and the Quebec Ministry of Economy, Innovation and Energy. Koseki has conducted research at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (Lausanne and Zurich), University of Oxford, National University of Singapore, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of Zurich, and Max Planck Institute for Art and Architecture History (Bibliotheca Hertziana). Back in his home city of Montréal, he works with his students on projects to revitalize and renaturalize the St. Lawrence River, as well as improve the quality of life of communities living along its shores.

Current Students

Postdoctorate - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
PhD - Université de Montréal
Master's Research - Université de Montréal

Publications

Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity
Rashid A. Mushkani
Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity
Rashid A. Mushkani
Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity
Rashid A. Mushkani
Street Review: A Participatory AI-Based Framework for Assessing Streetscape Inclusivity
Rashid A. Mushkani
WeDesign: Generative AI-Facilitated Community Consultations for Urban Public Space Design
Co-Producing AI: Toward an Augmented, Participatory Lifecycle
Rashid A. Mushkani
Toumadher Ammar
Cassandre Chatonnier
Despite efforts to mitigate the inherent risks and biases of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, these algorithms can disproportionatel… (see more)y impact culturally marginalized groups. A range of approaches has been proposed to address or reduce these risks, including the development of ethical guidelines and principles for responsible AI, as well as technical solutions that promote algorithmic fairness. Drawing on design justice, expansive learning theory, and recent empirical work on participatory AI, we argue that mitigating these harms requires a fundamental re-architecture of the AI production pipeline. This re-design should center co-production, diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), and multidisciplinary collaboration. We introduce an augmented AI lifecycle consisting of five interconnected phases: co-framing, co-design, co-implementation, co-deployment, and co-maintenance. The lifecycle is informed by four multidisciplinary workshops and grounded in themes of distributed authority and iterative knowledge exchange. Finally, we relate the proposed lifecycle to several leading ethical frameworks and outline key research questions that remain for scaling participatory governance.
Public perceptions of Montréal's streets: Implications for inclusive public space making and management
Rashid A. Mushkani
Toumadher Ammar
Negotiative Alignment: Embracing Disagreement to Achieve Fairer Outcomes -- Insights from Urban Studies
LIVS: A Pluralistic Alignment Dataset for Inclusive Public Spaces
Negotiative Alignment: Embracing Disagreement to Achieve Fairer Outcomes -- Insights from Urban Studies
LIVS: A Pluralistic Alignment Dataset for Inclusive Public Spaces
We introduce the Local Intersectional Visual Spaces (LIVS) dataset, a benchmark for multi-criteria alignment of text-to-image (T2I) models i… (see more)n inclusive urban planning. Developed through a two-year participatory process with 30 community organizations, LIVS encodes diverse spatial preferences across 634 initial concepts, consolidated into six core criteria: Accessibility, Safety, Comfort, Invitingness, Inclusivity, and Diversity, through 37,710 pairwise comparisons. Using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to fine-tune Stable Diffusion XL, we observed a measurable increase in alignment with community preferences, though a significant proportion of neutral ratings highlights the complexity of modeling intersectional needs. Additionally, as annotation volume increases, accuracy shifts further toward the DPO-tuned model, suggesting that larger-scale preference data enhances fine-tuning effectiveness. LIVS underscores the necessity of integrating context-specific, stakeholder-driven criteria into generative modeling and provides a resource for evaluating AI alignment methodologies across diverse socio-spatial contexts.
AI-EDI-SPACE: A Co-designed Dataset for Evaluating the Quality of Public Spaces
S. Gowaikar
Rashid A. Mushkani
Emmanuel Beaudry Marchand
Toumadher Ammar
Advancements in AI heavily rely on large-scale datasets meticulously curated and annotated for training. However, concerns persist regarding… (see more) the transparency and context of data collection methodologies, especially when sourced through crowdsourcing platforms. Crowdsourcing often employs low-wage workers with poor working conditions and lacks consideration for the representativeness of annotators, leading to algorithms that fail to represent diverse views and perpetuate biases against certain groups. To address these limitations, we propose a methodology involving a co-design model that actively engages stakeholders at key stages, integrating principles of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) to ensure diverse viewpoints. We apply this methodology to develop a dataset and AI model for evaluating public space quality using street view images, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing diverse perspectives and fostering higher-quality data.