Portrait de Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi

Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi

Membre académique associé
Professeure adjointe, McGill University, Département de génie électrique et informatique

Biographie

Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi (B. Ing., Ph. D.) est titulaire de la Chaire de recherche du Canada sur les soins de santé primaires numériques avancés et professeure adjointe au Département de médecine familiale de l'Université McGill et à Mila – Institut québécois d'intelligence artificielle.

Elle est également scientifique affiliée à l'Institut Lady Davis de recherches médicales de l'Hôpital général juif, présidente élue de la Société canadienne de recherche opérationnelle et directrice d'Intelligence artificielle en médecine familiale (AIFM).

Bénéficiant de sa formation interdisciplinaire, ses travaux portent sur le développement et la mise en œuvre de technologies de santé numérique avancées, telles que les outils d'aide à la décision basés sur l'IA, dans les soins de santé primaires. Ses recherches sont consacrées à l'amélioration de la prévention et de la gestion des maladies chroniques, dont les maladies cardiovasculaires, avec un accent particulier sur les populations vulnérables.

Les travaux qu’elle a menés en tant que chercheuse principale ont été financés par le Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS), le Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie (CRSNG), Roche Canada, la Fondation Brocher (Suisse) et la Stratégie de recherche axée sur le patient (SRAP) - Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC).

Elle a reçu de nombreux prix, notamment le prix New Investigator Primary Care Research 2022 du North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG), qui récompense les contributions exceptionnelles de nouveaux chercheurs dans le domaine de la recherche sur les soins primaires.

Étudiants actuels

Doctorat - McGill University
Maîtrise recherche - McGill University
Superviseur⋅e principal⋅e :
Postdoctorat - McGill University

Publications

Determinants of technology adoption and continued use among cognitively impaired older adults: a qualitative study
Samantha Dequanter
Maaike Fobelets
Iris Steenhout
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Anne Bourbonnais
Ronald Buyl
Ellen Gorus
User Experience of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Prenatal Trisomy Screening: Mixed Methods Explanatory Study
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
Chantale Pilon
Pierre Bérubé
Jean‐claude Forest
François Rousseau
Yves Giguère
France Légaré
Background Mobile health tools can support shared decision-making. We developed a computer-based decision aid (DA) to help pregnant women an… (voir plus)d their partners make informed, value-congruent decisions regarding prenatal screening for trisomy. Objective This study aims to assess the usability and usefulness of computer-based DA among pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers. Methods For this mixed methods sequential explanatory study, we planned to recruit a convenience sample of 45 pregnant women, 45 clinicians from 3 clinical sites, and 15 policy makers. Eligible women were aged >18 years and >16 weeks pregnant or had recently given birth. Eligible clinicians and policy makers were involved in prenatal care. We asked the participants to navigate a computer-based DA. We asked the women about the usefulness of the DA and their self-confidence in decision-making. We asked all participants about usability, quality, acceptability, satisfaction with the content of the DA, and collected sociodemographic data. We explored participants’ reactions to the computer-based DA and solicited suggestions. Our interview guide was based on the Mobile App Rating Scale. We performed descriptive analyses of the quantitative data and thematic deductive and inductive analyses of the qualitative data for each participant category. Results A total of 45 pregnant women, 14 clinicians, and 8 policy makers participated. Most pregnant women were aged between 25 and 34 years (34/45, 75%) and White (42/45, 94%). Most clinicians were aged between 35 and 44 years (5/14, 36%) and women (11/14, 79%), and all were White (14/14, 100%); the largest proportion of policy makers was aged between 45 and 54 years (4/8, 50%), women (5/8, 62%), and White (8/8, 100%). The mean usefulness score for preparing for decision-making for women was 80/100 (SD 13), and the mean self-efficacy score was 88/100 (SD 11). The mean usability score was 84/100 (SD 14) for pregnant women, 77/100 (SD 14) for clinicians, and 79/100 (SD 23) for policy makers. The mean global score for quality was 80/100 (SD 9) for pregnant women, 72/100 (SD 12) for clinicians, and 80/100 (SD 9) for policy makers. Regarding acceptability, participants found the amount of information just right (52/66, 79%), balanced (58/66, 88%), useful (38/66, 58%), and sufficient (50/66, 76%). The mean satisfaction score with the content was 84/100 (SD 13) for pregnant women, 73/100 (SD 16) for clinicians, and 73/100 (SD 20) for policy makers. Participants thought the DA could be more engaging (eg, more customizable) and suggested strategies for implementation, such as incorporating it into clinical guidelines. Conclusions Pregnant women, clinicians, and policy makers found the DA usable and useful. The next steps are to incorporate user suggestions for improving engagement and implementing the computer-based DA in clinical practice.
User Experience of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Prenatal Trisomy Screening: Mixed Methods Explanatory Study
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
Chantale Pilon
Pierre Bérubé
Jean-Claude Forest
François Rousseau
Yves Giguère
France Légaré
GCNFusion: An efficient graph convolutional network based model for information diffusion
Bahare Fatemi
Soheila Mehr Molaei
Shirui Pan
Application of AI in community based primary health care: Systematic review and critical appraisal
Patrick Archambault
Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
Sam Chandavong
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Sabrina M. Wong
Gauri Sharma
Lyse Langlois
Nathalie Rheault
Yves Couturier
Jean Légaré
Quantum-Inspired Interpertable AI-Empowered Decision Support System for Detection of Early-Stage Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Care Using Scarce Dataset
Mojtaba Kolahdoozi
Arka Mitra
Jose L Salmeron
Amir-Mohammad Navali
Alireza Sadeghpour
Amir Mir Mir Mohammadi
Evaluation of a prenatal screening decision aid: A mixed methods pilot study.
Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje
Mélissa Côté
Andrée-Anne Tremblay
Mariama Penda Diallo
Hélène Elidor
Alex Poulin Herron
Codjo Djignefa Djade
France Légaré
Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults
Charlene H Chu
Rune Nyrup
Kathleen Leslie
Jiamin Shi
Andria Bianchi
Alexandra Lyn
Molly McNicholl
Shehroz S Khan
Amanda Grenier
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are changing our world through their impact on sectors including health care, edu… (voir plus)cation, employment, finance, and law. AI systems are developed using data that reflect the implicit and explicit biases of society, and there are significant concerns about how the predictive models in AI systems amplify inequity, privilege, and power in society. The widespread applications of AI have led to mainstream discourse about how AI systems are perpetuating racism, sexism, and classism; yet, concerns about ageism have been largely absent in the AI bias literature. Given the globally aging population and proliferation of AI, there is a need to critically examine the presence of age-related bias in AI systems. This forum article discusses ageism in AI systems and introduces a conceptual model that outlines intersecting pathways of technology development that can produce and reinforce digital ageism in AI systems. We also describe the broader ethical and legal implications and considerations for future directions in digital ageism research to advance knowledge in the field and deepen our understanding of how ageism in AI is fostered by broader cycles of injustice.
Digital Ageism: Challenges and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence for Older Adults
Charlene H Chu
Rune Nyrup
Kathleen Leslie
Jiamin Shi
Andria Bianchi
Alexandra Lyn
Molly McNicholl
Shehroz S Khan
A. Grenier
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are changing our world through their impact on sectors including health care, edu… (voir plus)cation, employment, finance, and law. AI systems are developed using data that reflect the implicit and explicit biases of society, and there are significant concerns about how the predictive models in AI systems amplify inequity, privilege, and power in society. The widespread applications of AI have led to mainstream discourse about how AI systems are perpetuating racism, sexism, and classism; yet, concerns about ageism have been largely absent in the AI bias literature. Given the globally aging population and proliferation of AI, there is a need to critically examine the presence of age-related bias in AI systems. This forum article discusses ageism in AI systems and introduces a conceptual model that outlines intersecting pathways of technology development that can produce and reinforce digital ageism in AI systems. We also describe the broader ethical and legal implications and considerations for future directions in digital ageism research to advance knowledge in the field and deepen our understanding of how ageism in AI is fostered by broader cycles of injustice.
Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education: Considerations for Interdisciplinary Collaborations
Elif Bilgic
A. Gorgy
Meredith Young
Jason M. Harley
Arti fi cial intelligence (AI) based devices are currently being used in the delivery of surgical care in a variety of settings. 1,2 Howeve… (voir plus)r, AI-enabled systems can trigger a variety of opinions and emotions, which reveals the different lenses that shape views on AI. Nonethless, work within surgical education may necessitate a more balanced view; with an acknowledgment of the participation of AI-enhanced devices in the delivery of surgical care and education
Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education: Considerations for Interdisciplinary Collaborations
Elif Bilgic
Andrew Gorgy
Meredith Young
Jason M. Harley
Exploring the roles of artificial intelligence in surgical education: A scoping review.
Elif Bilgic
Andrew Gorgy
Alison Yang
Michelle Cwintal
Hamed Ranjbar
Kalin Kahla
Dheeksha Reddy
Kexin Li
Helin Ozturk
Eric Zimmermann
Andrea Quaiattini
Jason M. Harley