Join us on November 19 for the third edition of Mila’s science popularization contest, where students will present their complex research in just three minutes before a jury.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (see more)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.
Actor-critic methods have been central to many of the recent advances in deep reinforcement learning. The most common approach is to use _sy… (see more)mmetric_ architectures, whereby both actor and critic have the same network topology and number of parameters. However, recent works have argued for the advantages of _asymmetric_ setups, specifically with the use of smaller actors. We perform broad empirical investigations and analyses to better understand the implications of this and find that, in general, smaller actors result in performance degradation and overfit critics. Our analyses suggest _poor data collection_, due to value underestimation, as one of the main causes for this behavior, and further highlight the crucial role the critic can play in alleviating this pathology. We explore techniques to mitigate the observed value underestimation, which enables further research in asymmetric actor-critic methods.