Mila is hosting its first quantum computing hackathon on November 21, a unique day to explore quantum and AI prototyping, collaborate on Quandela and IBM platforms, and learn, share, and network in a stimulating environment at the heart of Quebec’s AI and quantum ecosystem.
This new initiative aims to strengthen connections between Mila’s research community, its partners, and AI experts across Quebec and Canada through in-person meetings and events focused on AI adoption in industry.
We use cookies to analyze the browsing and usage of our website and to personalize your experience. You can disable these technologies at any time, but this may limit certain functionalities of the site. Read our Privacy Policy for more information.
Setting cookies
You can enable and disable the types of cookies you wish to accept. However certain choices you make could affect the services offered on our sites (e.g. suggestions, personalised ads, etc.).
Essential cookies
These cookies are necessary for the operation of the site and cannot be deactivated. (Still active)
Analytics cookies
Do you accept the use of cookies to measure the audience of our sites?
Multimedia Player
Do you accept the use of cookies to display and allow you to watch the video content hosted by our partners (YouTube, etc.)?
Alexandre Piché
Alumni
Publications
Implicit Offline Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning
Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) via Supervised Learning is a simple and effective way to learn robotic skills from a dataset of varied b… (see more)ehaviors. It is as simple as supervised learning and Behavior Cloning (BC) but takes advantage of the return information. On BC tasks, implicit models have been shown to match or outperform explicit ones. Despite the benefits of using implicit models to learn robotic skills via BC, Offline RL via Supervised Learning algorithms have been limited to explicit models. We show how implicit models leverage return information and match or outperform explicit algorithms to acquire robotic skills from fixed datasets. Furthermore, we show how closely related our implicit methods are to other popular RL via Supervised Learning algorithms.
Reinforcement learning (RL) aims at autonomously performing complex tasks. To this end, a reward signal is used to steer the learning proces… (see more)s. While successful in many circumstances, the approach is typically data hungry, requiring large amounts of task-specific interaction between agent and environment to learn efficient behaviors. To alleviate this, unsupervised RL proposes to collect data through self-supervised interaction to accelerate task-specific adaptation. However, whether current unsupervised strategies lead to improved generalization capabilities is still unclear, more so when the input observations are high-dimensional. In this work, we advance the field by closing the performance gap in the Unsupervised RL Benchmark, a collection of tasks to be solved in a data-efficient manner, after interacting with the environment in a self-supervised way. Our approach uses unsupervised exploration for collecting experience to pre-train a world model. Then, when fine-tuning for downstream tasks, the agent leverages the learned model and a hybrid planner to efficiently adapt for the given tasks, achieving comparable results to task-specific base-lines, while using 20x less data. We extensively evaluate our work, comparing several exploration methods and improving the fine-tuning process by studying the interactions between the learned components. Furthermore, we investigate the limitations of the pre-trained agent, gaining insights into how these influence the decision process and shedding light on new research directions.
In this work we propose a principled evaluation framework for model-based optimisation to measure how well a generative model can extrapolat… (see more)e. We achieve this by interpreting the training and validation splits as draws from their respective ‘truncated’ ground truth distributions, where examples in the validation set contain scores much larger than those in the training set. Model selection is performed on the validation set for some prescribed validation metric. A major research question however is in determining what validation metric correlates best with the expected value of generated candidates with respect to the ground truth oracle; work towards answering this question can translate to large economic gains since it is expensive to evaluate the ground truth oracle in the real world. We compare various validation metrics for generative adversarial networks using our framework. We also discuss limitations with our framework with respect to existing datasets and how progress can be made to mitigate them. 1